Author |
Topic: Mr. Jody Carver, it's me again! |
Rick Collins
From: Claremont , CA USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 11:22 am
|
|
Jody (and other Fender gurus and historians), my 26" Fender triple-neck Stringmaster is dated under the inside neck keyhead as 7/54. There is also (#2) penciled in, right after the date (???) It's serial number is 0314; which is stamped on the chrome plate on which the volume and tone controls are located.
Jody, do you know what the meaning of (#2) is?
Another oddity (to me) is that the nut on the outside neck has the wider groves, that were made to accept all bass strings. Jody, were some of the production triple-necks made with these kind of nuts on the outside neck?
Clearly, this guitar is not a broken-up four-neck; because all necks are correct thickness for a triple-neck guitar, with no misplaced holes showing. And the original Fender decal is still on the front of the outside neck. I've seen four-neck Stringmasters (up close) with the thicker outside neck set up for bass strings; but never a triple-neck.
...at you convenience,
Many thanks, Rick |
|
|
|
Erv Niehaus
From: Litchfield, MN, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 11:36 am
|
|
I have a 1955 T-8 Stringmaster with the deeper grooves cut for bass strings. In fact, I used to put bass strings on the bottom 4 strings on my A tuning neck and play these strings like a bass.
Erv |
|
|
|
Karl Oberlander
From: Austin, Texas, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 11:40 am
|
|
MY '57 T-8 Stringmaster has the deeper grooves and the larger tuner holes for bass strings on the outside neck as well. I think that was the established norm for the T-8.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande
Stringmaster T-8
Fender Super Reverb
|
|
|
|
Rick Collins
From: Claremont , CA USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 11:58 am
|
|
Erv and Karl many thanks.
In your opinion is there any need to get a new nut turned with the smaller groves for that neck, if I install strings to be tuned to a conventional tuning like C6th there. I plan to tune the three necks, outside to inside:
C-6th
B-11th
E-13th
Rick |
|
|
|
Karl Oberlander
From: Austin, Texas, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 12:07 pm
|
|
Rick,
Why don't you move the nut and tuning pan with the larger string grooves/holes to the neck you want to use for B-11? B-11 usually uses a lot larger guage strings than the others. In fact when I got my T-8 it was done that way with the large hole tuner pan in the middle. They didn't move the nut with the large grooves over but I'd do that if I were you. Right now I have mine set up as follows from outter to inner:
B-11 (.014 - .068) John Ely
E-13 (.010 - .036) Scotty's
C-6 (.012 - .042) John Ely
Be careful taking the nut off. It has small phillips head screws and you need to lube them to loosen them so that you don't strip the screw head.
Kobe
------------------
Gibson D-8 Console Grande
Stringmaster T-8. Alkire D-10
Fender Super Reverb
|
|
|
|
Tim Whitlock
From: Colorado, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 12:26 pm
|
|
My '56 T8 also has the wide groove nut on the outside neck. Here's a thought: Maybe Fender put this on the fat neck to minimize any warpage that might occur with the heavy guage strings. I experienced a bit of warpage when I was experimenting with tunings on the middle neck and tightened some of the bass strings a bit too much. The fretboard bowed up a bit as a result. I would not move the wide grooved nut to the other necks if you're going to use the heavy strings.
Tim
------------------
Tim Whitlock
'58 Fender 1000, '56 Fender Stringmaster, '65 Twin Reissue
|
|
|
|
Erv Niehaus
From: Litchfield, MN, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 1:44 pm
|
|
Rick,
I never had any problem using regular gauge strings on the neck with the deeper string grooves. It's all relative.
Erv |
|
|
|
Chris Scruggs
From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 2:40 pm
|
|
Is the #2 under the middle neck? I believe they are all labeled #1, #2, #3, but I'm not sure. I belive Stringmasters have the date written under all the necks, too.
Chris |
|
|
|
Rick Collins
From: Claremont , CA USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 3:28 pm
|
|
Thanks to all for the valuable information.
Chris, that's the perplexing part; #2 is penciled on the inside neck. Two of the necks are dated 7/54, and one (center neck) is dated 6/54.
Of course, this doesn't matter. No parts are missing.
This is an amazing instrument. A master piece of design.
Rick |
|
|
|
Ron Whitfield
From: Kaaawa, Hawaii, USA
|
Posted 28 Aug 2003 5:46 pm
|
|
On my recent thread concerning sustain, I meant to ask about this large grooved nut which is likewise on my friends '55 T8. Glad to hear it get some press. I'll assume it is indeed at least semi standard, and for a bass set up. Thus, what tuning/s would have been suggested from the factory? |
|
|
|
Ian Finlay
From: Kenton, UK
|
Posted 29 Aug 2003 7:24 am
|
|
Someone told me once it was a G6 tuning. My T-8 came with bass strings on the outside neck tuned this way.
Ian |
|
|
|
Chris Scruggs
From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
|
Posted 29 Aug 2003 12:37 pm
|
|
A frind of mine uses an E6 bass tuning. It is the same "shape" as A6, but tuned down to E. He uses all wound strings, too. I believe the gauges are something like .020w to .070w.
1.B
2.G#
3.E
4.C#
5.B
6.G#
7.E
8.C#
I have also been thinking about trying a bass A6 tuning out on my 3rd neck. I would prefer this more than the above mentioned E tuning, because the root for A is much lower. I think this would be low enough, since most country upright bass players rarely go lower than a bass A anyways(there E string is more of a thumb rest).
1.A .022p
2.E .030w
3.C# .036w
4.A .042w
5.F# .054w
6.E .058w
7.C# .064w
8.A .068w
|
|
|
|
Jody Carver
From: KNIGHT OF FENDER TWEED
|
|
|
|
Rick Collins
From: Claremont , CA USA
|
Posted 2 Sep 2003 6:18 am
|
|
Jody, (or anyone else) who were the players that used tunings of all bass strings? I've never heard anyone play in such a tuning.
Rick |
|
|
|