| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Neck truss rods?
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Neck truss rods?
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 21 Feb 2003 12:56 pm    
Reply with quote

When did the guitar builders start using truss rods in the neck of their guitars?
There has been quite a bit of discussion on the Forum about the possible damage to the round neck of a guitar by installing a raised nut to facilitate playing with a bar. (Remember, I said playing with a bar not in a bar!)
I would think that installing a raised nut wouldn't make that much of a difference on a guitar with a truss rod in the neck. Incidently this is what I am planning to do on a recently acquired round neck tricone, (with a trussed neck).
Erv
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ron Randall

 

From:
Dallas, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 21 Feb 2003 7:59 pm    
Reply with quote

Martin just woke up to the idea a few years ago. Duh!

Fender Strats have been like that since 1962 at least.

Taylor acoustics since the git-go in 1974.

I raised the nut on a Gibson Dobro roundneck a few months ago, and it pulled the neck a noticeable amount. The truss rod did compensate. I would not get too rowdy with the string gauges.

Hope this helps.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tom Olson

 

From:
Spokane, WA
Post  Posted 21 Feb 2003 9:53 pm    
Reply with quote

I'm not a guitar expert -- but, I think the main purpose of the truss-rod is to provide for compensation in the event of a warped neck. That is, I don't think the truss rod actually adds that much strength to the neck, it just provides you with a way to tweek the neck a bit if you have to.

Like Ron said, I think the main problem is when you try to put a raised nut on WITH medium or heavy strings. The added tension of the heavier strings plus the extra leverage provided by the raised nut is sometimes a little bit much for a round neck.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Herb Steiner

 

From:
Spicewood TX 78669
Post  Posted 21 Feb 2003 10:19 pm    
Reply with quote

Gibson began using truss rods in the necks of mandolins and guitars in 1922.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 22 Feb 2003 8:59 am    
Reply with quote

What gauge strings would your recommend? I plan on putting an A high bass tuning on the tricone. From high to low: E C# A E C# A.
Thanks,
Erv
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
R. L. Jones

 

From:
Lake Charles, Louisiana, USA
Post  Posted 23 Feb 2003 7:40 am    
Reply with quote

Amem to the posts about heavy syrings, theres much more to concider here. I would use the raised nut,on a round neck only if you already have a round neck guitar,. I have a great Penco, round neck, dreadnaught made in Japan. Idone just that and the bridge began to come loose. Had to have it repaired.

If you are going to use a raised nut on a round neck, Install a tail piece to hold the strings. That way theres no strain on the bridge

R. L.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
oj hicks


From:
Springville, AL
Post  Posted 23 Feb 2003 9:32 pm    
Reply with quote

I haven't personally read the threads on the Forum where they discuss their concerns about raising the strings. But those with engineering background will conceed that what is occurring is the increase of a moment arm from the centroid of the neck. Look at it like having a lever pulling on something. The farther away from the centroid axis of the neck you get to impose the pull of the strings the greater is the bending moment imparted to the neck. Just the thoughts of a retired engineer. And just my speculation of the previously voiced concern.

oj hicks
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Gambrell

 

From:
Over there
Post  Posted 24 Feb 2003 11:20 am    
Reply with quote

Herb, you're right as usual. Gibson is credited with the adjustable truss rod(although Ivan Guernsey has a 30's Gibson, without a truss rod of any kind, that eats Weissenborns alive), but Martin was reinforcing the necks, too. Ron, they went to the adjustable truss rod in the late 70's/early 80's. Prior to that, they epoxied a piece of carbon steel square tubing in the neck, for reinforcement. The only time they didn't, was during WWII, when all the metal was going to the war effort, so Martin used a piece of ebony instead. They only switched to the adjustable rod to cut down on the number of non-adjustable guitars, with their lifetime warranties, being sent in for neck resets.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 24 Feb 2003 12:43 pm    
Reply with quote

Any help with the string gauges?
Uff-Da!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jody Carver


From:
KNIGHT OF FENDER TWEED
Post  Posted 24 Feb 2003 4:22 pm    
Reply with quote

Herb
Is that the year you bought your Gibson??
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
R. L. Jones

 

From:
Lake Charles, Louisiana, USA
Post  Posted 24 Feb 2003 7:25 pm    
Reply with quote

oj hicks , well said, well put thats something i`ve been trying to relate to . Just dont have the treminology to make it understood. Any to say the least, its better to get a square neck to to play Dobro style.

Just an opinion

R.L.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 25 Feb 2003 7:57 am    
Reply with quote

String gauges?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Gambrell

 

From:
Over there
Post  Posted 25 Feb 2003 9:05 am    
Reply with quote

What kind of tuning you plan on using, Erv?
Uff-Da, y'all
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 25 Feb 2003 10:10 am    
Reply with quote

A high bass. From high to low: E C# A E C# A
Erv
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Gambrell

 

From:
Over there
Post  Posted 25 Feb 2003 6:48 pm    
Reply with quote

Erv, try this:
.013
.017
.026
.035
.038 to .040
.045 to .046
You might want to experiment a little with the C# and A (5th and 6th)b ut that should be in the ballpark.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2003 8:45 am    
Reply with quote

Stephen:
Thank you so much for the string gauges. I want enough meat there to activate the cones but not enough to do damage to the neck.
Thanks again,
Erv
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron