| Author |
Topic: crackling/"bacon sizzling" noise |
Rick Vizzi
From:
New Jersey, USA
|
Posted 4 Jun 2005 6:37 pm |
|
| I'm very happy to report that Sam Marshall diagnosed the noise problem of my new 65 Twin Reverb 15 correctly as the reverb recovery tube. I replaced that 12AX7 and now she sounds like a dream. Beautiful tone. |
|
|
 |
John Bechtel
From:
Nashville, Tennessee, R.I.P.
|
Posted 4 Jun 2005 9:04 pm
|
|
I'll go along with that! The ’65 Re-Issue is a dream to play through! Both PSG and Non-Pedal! I even use about the same settings for both!
------------------
“Big John” Bechtel
’04 SD–10 Black Derby w/3 & 5 & Pad
’49-’50 Fender T–8 Custom
’65 Re-Issue Fender Twin–Reverb Custom™ 15” Eminence
web site |
|
|
|
Mark Herrick
From:
Bakersfield, CA
|
Posted 4 Jun 2005 9:33 pm
|
|
Woo Hoo!
I love it when the solution is simple!
Cheers!
------------------
|
|
|
|
Jack Stoner
From:
Kansas City, MO
|
Posted 5 Jun 2005 3:09 am
|
|
"reverb recovery tube"
That's a new term. Having worked on amps for many years (back when the "old" Fenders were new) that term was never used or even invented. |
|
|
|
Klaus Caprani
From:
Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Posted 5 Jun 2005 3:11 am
|
|
I was wondering about that too. Wouldn't a more correct description be "reverb buffer" or "reverb return tube"?
------------------
Klaus Caprani
MCI RangeXpander S-10 3x4
www.klauscaprani.com
|
|
|
|
Blake Hawkins
From:
Florida
|
Posted 5 Jun 2005 3:19 am
|
|
"Reverb Receive Tube", "Reverb Post Amplifier Tube", "Reverb Grabber Tube"
"Reverb Decoder Tube" "Reverb Detector Tube",
 |
|
|
|
John Daugherty
From:
Rolla, Missouri, USA
|
Posted 5 Jun 2005 3:23 am
|
|
| "A rose by any name is a rose"......WS |
|
|
|
