Author |
Topic: Over or under tuning pegs? |
Tom Gorr
From: Three Hills, Alberta
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 9:17 am
|
|
In the quest to cover off every nuance..trivia...and minutia related to the instrument... does anyone out there wrap their strings under the tuning peg to increase the string angle bearing on the keyhead...particularly on the long stretches past the nut to the tuner.
Also...how does your wrap approach improve things?
Last edited by Tom Gorr on 28 Feb 2015 2:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
Rich Peterson
From: Moorhead, MN
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 10:18 am
|
|
I think the machines are designed to bear the tension with the string going under. So the tuners might last longer that way. |
|
|
|
James Jacoby
From: Ohio, USA
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 10:47 am
|
|
I always thought it was supposed to improve the sustain. -Jake- |
|
|
|
Tom Gorr
From: Three Hills, Alberta
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 11:09 am
|
|
As it turns out... Im glad to have asked. Every guitar Ive owned..all used...came with overslung strings so just thought it was just an optional practise. |
|
|
|
Jim Smith
From: Midlothian, TX, USA
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 12:49 pm
|
|
I've never seen anyone that winds their strings under the tuning pegs (on purpose)! As for the wrap, I put one wind towards the tip of the peg, then cross over to help lock it into place, and wind the rest on the inside towards the base. |
|
|
|
John Bresler R.I.P.
From: Thornton, Colorado
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 12:55 pm
|
|
I agree with Jim and have never seen a steel with strings wrapped under the peg. They always go over the top.
|
|
|
|
Darrell Birtcher
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 1:07 pm
|
|
This is right place for minutiae! I might have to try that next time I restring. Some guitars have an annoying string resonance up there, especially the 5th and 6th strings. Shortening the string in the keyhead area may change that and might help. Might make it worse. We'll see. |
|
|
|
John Scanlon
From: Jackson, Mississippi, USA
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 1:32 pm
|
|
I have never seen that, either. I think I'd have a hard time getting used to turning the tuning pegs the opposite way for a while. Also, since the nuts are rolling nuts, indicating string movement is normal, I would think that increasing friction / tension via string angle would be undesirable. Of course, the difference in angle would be tiny and may not make a huge difference. Just hazarding a guess. _________________ Click here for the Index to Mickey Adams's YouTube video lessons
Insert impressive gear list here. |
|
|
|
Bob Knight
From: Bowling Green KY
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 2:10 pm Nope
|
|
I have seen 2 guitars strung like that in 50+ years, they were strung by beginning players. There may be an advantage to it, but there are a lot of pros that play and build these beasts and I believe they would have been onto this a long time before now.
Bob _________________ <b>Rick Johnson Cabinets<b>
<b>Brand X Custom Fiber Cases</b>
<b> John Pearse Thumb Picks, Bars and Strings</b>
"Thankfully, persistence is a great substitute for talent."
— Steve Martin |
|
|
|
Jerry Overstreet
From: Louisville Ky
|
|
|
|
chris ivey
From: california (deceased)
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 4:57 pm
|
|
having to wind your tuners backward would be a deal breaker for me. that and everybody laughing at me. |
|
|
|
Jon Light
From: Saugerties, NY
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 5:22 pm
|
|
I have a 10 string guitar that has 6th string rattle at the nut due to inadequate down-pressure (with a plain string--I've never tried a wound string on it. String 7 is fine). Going under the post on this one string fixes the problem. I totally hate that this one string tunes backwards. If I played this guitar more I'd look for a better fix.
I certainly don't want a steeper break on strings 1, 2, 9, 10 by going under the post on all strings. |
|
|
|
John Booth
From: Columbus Ohio, USA
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 5:40 pm
|
|
I don't know much about winding them under, but I always wind them in spring fashion from the tip to the inside.
I feel that the peg is stronger on the inside and takes less torque that way. _________________ Jb in Ohio
..................................
GFI S10 Ultra, Telecaster, a Hound Dog, and an Annoyed Wife
.................................. |
|
|
|
Ernie Renn
From: Brainerd, Minnesota USA
|
Posted 28 Feb 2015 9:44 pm
|
|
When turning the tuning peg and string tension I went with the "righty tighty-lefty loosy" thing... Righty being clockwise and loosy being counterclockwise. If you run the string under the shaft it would be backwards... _________________ My best,
Ernie
www.BuddyEmmons.com |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 1 Mar 2015 5:06 am
|
|
I would sure try a wound 6th string.
The mass will change the vibration, probably toward more slowly.
Having one different could change things while tuning in a loud or confusing place.
John Scanlon's guess sounds right to me:
Quote: |
since the nuts are rolling nuts, indicating string movement is normal, I would think that increasing friction / tension via string angle would be undesirable.
Of course, the difference in angle would be tiny and may not make a huge difference. |
The stresses on the singing length of string and the non-singing length behind the nut should and will equalize.
Having the string under the post may inhibit that; also just a guess. |
|
|
|
Wayne Quinn
From: Cape Breton.NovaScotia
|
Posted 1 Mar 2015 5:36 am agree
|
|
For what its worth, I think I have to agree with John Scanlon . I think under your going to change string tone . as well as extra down pressure on the rollers. my 2 cents worth. _________________ D10 Carter, SD10 Mullen .Nashville 400,. peavey 112 Boss DD3., RV5, |
|
|
|
Donny Hinson
From: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
|
Posted 2 Mar 2015 4:02 pm
|
|
I'm with Chris and Ernie, winding the tuners backwards to tighten the strings would drive me bonkers! Not as bonkers as the acoustic players who don't cut off their strings, but make big coils at the tuning head, but bonkers nevertheless. |
|
|
|
Tom Gorr
From: Three Hills, Alberta
|
Posted 2 Mar 2015 5:09 pm
|
|
You guys kill me...play the most difficult musical contraption imaginable and a backwards tuner has ya worried. Most give up when they figure out what LKR means.
|
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 3 Mar 2015 3:36 am
|
|
LKR? You mean LNR?
When you can't play 'Behind The Bridge' on your guitar, you have to play behind the nut.
Fine pianos have cloth woven through the non-singing lengths of strings to keep them quiet.
Other pianos, it appears more for show, keeping up with the Steinways.
The down-bearing of piano strings can't be changed. Where there is the possibility of change,
people will mess with things.
You say LKR, I say L>.
See? it even looks like a knee.
You say alphanumerical, I say graphic.
Weave that into your strings.
The question is, will it change your tune? _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Lane Gray
From: Topeka, KS
|
Posted 3 Mar 2015 4:07 am
|
|
If I had to wind them under (such as inadequate pressure on the roller), I'd swap 5 and 6 (on a ten, 6 and 7 on a 12), so that I'd still turn the key clockwise for tighter, and anticlockwise for looser. _________________ 2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects |
|
|
|
John Billings
From: Ohio, USA
|
Posted 3 Mar 2015 1:15 pm
|
|
Seems like the string angle to the roller would be really drastic on strings 1 and 10, And not much fun to change. _________________ Dr. Z Surgical Steel amp, amazing!
"74 Bud S-10 3&6
'73 Bud S-10 3&5(under construction)
'63 Fingertip S-10, at James awaiting 6 knees
'57 Strat, LP Blue
'91 Tele with 60's Maple neck
Dozen more guitars!
Dozens of amps, but SF Quad reverb, Rick Johnson cabs. JBL 15, '64 Vibroverb for at home.
'52 and '56 Pro Amps |
|
|
|
Fred Thompson
From: Zephyrhills, FL
|
Posted 3 Mar 2015 4:49 pm
|
|
Like toilet paper, they should be over the top... _________________ The difference between a musician and a savings bond is eventually the bond will mature and earn money. |
|
|
|
John Billings
From: Ohio, USA
|
Posted 3 Mar 2015 4:54 pm
|
|
"Like toilet paper, they should be over the top... "
Unless you're a womyn with cats! _________________ Dr. Z Surgical Steel amp, amazing!
"74 Bud S-10 3&6
'73 Bud S-10 3&5(under construction)
'63 Fingertip S-10, at James awaiting 6 knees
'57 Strat, LP Blue
'91 Tele with 60's Maple neck
Dozen more guitars!
Dozens of amps, but SF Quad reverb, Rick Johnson cabs. JBL 15, '64 Vibroverb for at home.
'52 and '56 Pro Amps |
|
|
|
Don Griffiths
From: Steelville, MO
|
Posted 3 Mar 2015 5:08 pm
|
|
Was just going to ask this myself after re-stringing a few days ago. I wound them over. Was also going to ask the minimum number of wraps around the tuner per string. I'll start another thread for this. _________________ Shobud Pro1,BMI U12, Santa Cruz F, PRS Standard, Fender Twin Reverb, ‘53 000-28 |
|
|
|