| Author |
Topic: setting up wireless sytem using 2 amps |
John Parlee
From:
Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 3:23 am |
|
| Anyone come up with a system of using wireless device, im using 2amps a boss stereo delay. Trying to cut down the cable mess. |
|
|
 |
Scott Duckworth
From:
Etowah, TN Western Foothills of the Smokies
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 3:52 am
|
|
You would need everything before the stereo split connected to a single transmitter, and two receivers on the same channel connected to the amps. You still would have a mono signal feeding two mono systems.
I.E. you need two wireless units on the same frequency, use both receivers, but only one transmitter.
_________________
Amateur Radio Operator NA4IT (Extra)
http://www.qsl.net/na4it
I may, in fact, be nuts. However, I am screwed onto the right bolt... Jesus! |
|
|
|
John Parlee
From:
Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 5:17 am wirelless system
|
|
| thanks for the answer kind of what i suspected, guess ill neaten up the cables lol |
|
|
|
Scott Duckworth
From:
Etowah, TN Western Foothills of the Smokies
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 5:41 am
|
|
A weird thing I have found out about wireless systems, that if the TX and RX are in close proximity to each other, they can act squirrelly. Also, I haven't found a wireless unit yet that a well placed cell phone won't interfere with.
_________________
Amateur Radio Operator NA4IT (Extra)
http://www.qsl.net/na4it
I may, in fact, be nuts. However, I am screwed onto the right bolt... Jesus! |
|
|
|
Richard Sinkler
From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 9:40 am
|
|
Wouldn't you get true stereo if you came out of the stereo effects unit, with each output going to a transmitter and having 2 receiver's set at different frequencies at each amp. The transmitters could be mounted to a pedalboard next to the player. That would eliminate the cords to the amps, and cord clutter at the guitar.
Unless the cords are a real problem, like tripping people, I just see the whole wireless thing as a waste of money. Just more things to go wrong.
_________________
Carter D10 8p/8k, Dekley S10 3p/4k C6 setup,Regal RD40 Dobro, Recording King Professional Dobro, NV400, NV112,Ibanez Gio guitar, Epiphone SG Special (open D slide guitar) . Playing for 54 years and still counting. |
|
|
|
John Parlee
From:
Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 12:07 pm
|
|
| I agree just got to set things a little neater its a lot cheaper as well thanks for the reply though john |
|
|
|
Scott Duckworth
From:
Etowah, TN Western Foothills of the Smokies
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 2:39 pm
|
|
The most you can get trying to convert mono to stereo is two mono tracks. If the source is mono, it will still be mono coming out, just amplified twice.
_________________
Amateur Radio Operator NA4IT (Extra)
http://www.qsl.net/na4it
I may, in fact, be nuts. However, I am screwed onto the right bolt... Jesus! |
|
|
|
Richard Sinkler
From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 5:05 pm
|
|
Except for patches where one channel is dry and the other delayed. Granted, the guitar is not stereo, but the signal becomes stereo upon exiting a stereo out device, like delay pedals. Stereo IS 2 mono channels combined. It's just the mono channels can be carrying different stuff.
_________________
Carter D10 8p/8k, Dekley S10 3p/4k C6 setup,Regal RD40 Dobro, Recording King Professional Dobro, NV400, NV112,Ibanez Gio guitar, Epiphone SG Special (open D slide guitar) . Playing for 54 years and still counting. |
|
|
|
Stephen Cowell
From:
Round Rock, Texas, USA
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 6:04 pm
|
|
You can also have things like the mono signal coming out both channels in phase, but the delayed/reverbed sound out of phase... really gives the wide effect.
_________________
New FB Page: Lap Steel Licks And Stuff: https://www.facebook.com/groups/195394851800329 |
|
|
|
Craig Baker
From:
Eatonton, Georgia, USA - R.I.P.
|
Posted 14 Feb 2015 6:19 pm
|
|
Years ago, at an FM station in Delaware, we ceossed the reverb circuits. Sampled the left channel, ran it through a spring reverb circuit and added a small amount of the reverb's output to the right channel. We did the same thing in reverse, adding the right channel reverb signal back into the left channel. The result ws a very big sound on the air.
Craig
_________________
"Make America Great Again". . . The Only Country With Dream After Its Name. |
|
|
|
Peter Harris
From:
South Australia, Australia
|
Posted 15 Feb 2015 2:32 am
|
|
| Craig Baker wrote: |
Years ago, at an FM station in Delaware, we ceossed the reverb circuits. Sampled the left channel, ran it through a spring reverb circuit and added a small amount of the reverb's output to the right channel. We did the same thing in reverse, adding the right channel reverb signal back into the left channel. The result ws a very big sound on the air.
Craig |
Dangit Craig.. that's interesting!!
I can feel some experimenting coming on with my Roland synth stuff... 
Just when I thought I had an easy week..
Cheers from 36C Oz
Peter
_________________
If my wife is reading this, I don't have much stuff....really! |
|
|
|
Craig Baker
From:
Eatonton, Georgia, USA - R.I.P.
|
Posted 15 Feb 2015 4:11 am
|
|
Peter,
It was back during the "loudness wars" that radio stations were having. We originated an adult standards format, Nat King Cole, Carpenters, etc. With those artists, we didn't need to be in a loudness war, but we still wanted the sound to get noticed. We purchased two Fisher Space Expanders and modified them for low impedance inputs and outputs. If I remember correctly, we rolled off some of the low end of the reverb signals. Everybody thought the station sounded great and nobody could figure out why.
All the best Peter.
Craig
_________________
"Make America Great Again". . . The Only Country With Dream After Its Name. |
|
|
|
