| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Sho~Bud Changer progressions ???
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Sho~Bud Changer progressions ???
Kevin Raymer


From:
Chalybeate, Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 31 Aug 2014 9:22 pm    
Reply with quote

Would someone share the progression of the Showbud changers/pullers over time ??

How long were they single raise single lower ??

When did they expand ??

What was the most advanced changer they made ??

What were the transition points.

That kinda stuff..

Someday I'd like to get another Bud, and I'd like to know a little more about them and their evolution.

Thanks in advance for sharing....

Smile
_________________
Kevin Raymer
Zum / Knaggs / Breedlove
Fractal Audio
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Richard Sinkler


From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
Post  Posted 31 Aug 2014 10:38 pm    
Reply with quote

If by saying "single raise, single lower", I assume you are talking about the rack and barrel, or 2 hole pullers. That is incorrect. They are not single raise, single lower. If the rod is long enough, you could put a barrel on every pedal and lever on one string.
_________________
Carter D10 8p/8k, Dekley S10 3p/4k C6 setup,Regal RD40 Dobro, Recording King Professional Dobro, NV400, NV112,Ibanez Gio guitar, Epiphone SG Special (open D slide guitar) . Playing for 54 years and still counting.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kevin Raymer


From:
Chalybeate, Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 5:11 am    
Reply with quote

Ok....

Well that brings up another question.

I've read where folks talk about racks and barrels.

Don't understand what that means...

Sad
_________________
Kevin Raymer
Zum / Knaggs / Breedlove
Fractal Audio
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lane Gray


From:
Topeka, KS
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 6:19 am    
Reply with quote

This guitar has rack and barrel.
http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=269962
Notice in the second picture, it doesn't have a cross shaft and bellcranks: there are two racks per pedal or lever, one for raising (nearer the deck) and one for lowering (higher off the deck).
The brass things on the rods next to the racks are barrels. To tune a change, you spin the rod, and the barrel adjusts at the rack. You can have as many changes per string as you want, and each rack can move many barrels.
_________________
2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
James Morehead


From:
Prague, Oklahoma, USA - R.I.P.
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 7:34 am    
Reply with quote

It's Shobud, not Showbud. Easy mistake Smile

Check out this sight--Much good info here: http://www.planet.eon.net/~gsimmons/shobud/models.html

Richard S. is right, that the single/single changer is virtually universal. Single/single changer is, however the right term. Single/single refers to the rods you are able to use per finger. Double/single, double/double, triple/double, etc.. As Lane says, put a barrel where there is a rod running through a rack--that's your limits---as long as you have racks(or the two-hole pullers that REPLACED the racks). The two-hole puller with barrels is the same idea, and it replaced racks to shed a little weight and make the guitar a little more mechanically quieter.

The best system Shobud invented was the barrels behind two-hole pullers with single/single changer, in many Shobud enthusiast's mind. Me included.

The first model Shobud offered were the Permanants, with a single piece finger. Then the fingertip was introduced, and were the first all-pull system in the steel guitar world. They actually came with triple raise/double lower. Then the single/single changer appeared in the next model Shobud offered--the Crossover. It lasted only about 2 years and was ditched because the undercarriage was poorly designed. In theory, was a great idea, but Baldwin's bean counters virtually tied Shobuds hands and made them strip down the concept, of course, because Baldwin wanted to "save money".

the single/single changer survived the next two models and was a very successful changer. That was the Professionals and Pro II's--both roundfront cabinets.

Late '73-early '74 the Pro II came out with double raise/single lower and dropped the brass barrels. This was the first of the nylon tuners. Another change--there was a set screw in the brass rollers(that are part of the two-hole pullers). This set screw locked the pullrod so it would not rotate like it did to screw the barrels in or out--now the adjustmet took place with the nylon tuner screwing in or out, on threads on the end of the pullrod.

Soon after/ the Pro II roundfront cabinet was replaced with a square front cabinet--enter the "Pro II Custom".

Now understand this, and you will understand alot--The Pro II and the Pro II CUSTOM are different guitars. Many get confused about this fact---those are two different models--not created equal!

Along with these changes, more and more pot metal was used in the Shobud to shave cost. By now, barrels were history--all you could get were the newer all-pull fingers, first double single/then double double, then triple/double. The Pro III came along during the later part of the Pro II custom run. The Pro III had the metal necks. Then the scaled down body of the Super Pro--loaded with pot metal.

I lose excitement with the introduction of the nylon tuner era Shobuds. But that's just me.

This is the best I know, as Shobud history is pretty mysterious. Hope this helps. Smile
_________________
"Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement"~old cowboy proverb.
shobud@windstream.net
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
James Morehead


From:
Prague, Oklahoma, USA - R.I.P.
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 7:42 am    
Reply with quote

Rack & barrel system:


Two-hole puller system:




_________________
"Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement"~old cowboy proverb.
shobud@windstream.net
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Justin Griffith


From:
Taylor, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 8:01 am    
Reply with quote

What James said!
The rack or 2 hole behind barrels are my favorite Sho~Bud design. The guitars with barrels are incredibly easy to setup, adjust and maintain too.
To me those and the permanent guitars sound the best.
_________________
Emmons/Sho~Bud/Blanton, Fender/Peavey.
Telonics pedal
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Edward Rhea

 

From:
Medford Oklahoma, USA
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 8:25 am     ShoBud
Reply with quote

Kevin Raymer says: "Someday I'd like to get another Bud, and I'd like to know a little more about them and their evolution."

Personally Kevin, I'd love to hear that you end(ed) up with a "roundfront shobud" w/single/single changer! Mine is, and it's reliable and sounds super!(the guitar, not the owner).
_________________
“TONESNOB”
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Richard Sinkler


From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 12:57 pm    
Reply with quote

My favorite Bud's were the rack and barrel. Sure, they were noisy, but you could only hear it at low volumes. I feel kind of a "romantic" feeling towards the rack and barrel Bud's. Kind of like push/pull lovers feel about their guitars. I've played a 2 hole puller guitar a few times, but never had the privilege to own one (my loss). I then owned a Super-Pro. That undercarriage was horrible. The biggest mistake I think Sh~Bud made, was not angling the LKL cross shaft as they did in the earlier models. The pot metal knee lever brackets broke easily. The only one I ever broke was the LKL. Your knee arcs from right to left, front to back, and hits the lever at an angle causing pressure on the bracket going from front to back, breaking the bracket. The guitar when I got it was 8 and 6 (levers). By the time I got fed up and sold it, it was 8 and 3 because I kept stealing brackets from other levers. And I had to take a lever from my Kline to put on the cross shaft of the Super-Pro if I wanted to have 4 levers. Luckily, the Kline and Super-Pro both had hex cross shafts.

I wish I had the money to pick up a few Bud's. Those and ZB's are the best guitars made in my opinion, except for Kline (my favorite). And with guys like James and Michael Yahl, parts are no longer a problem. The only problem with their parts are, they make the parts already in the guitar look like crap. Their parts are are like putting a Rolls Royce next to a Yugo.
_________________
Carter D10 8p/8k, Dekley S10 3p/4k C6 setup,Regal RD40 Dobro, Recording King Professional Dobro, NV400, NV112,Ibanez Gio guitar, Epiphone SG Special (open D slide guitar) . Playing for 54 years and still counting.


Last edited by Richard Sinkler on 1 Sep 2014 7:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kevin Raymer


From:
Chalybeate, Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 6:52 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks guys great info.

What I think I have a hankering for is an LDG.

Where do they fit in there ??

Are some vintages of them better than others ??

Thanks.
_________________
Kevin Raymer
Zum / Knaggs / Breedlove
Fractal Audio
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
James Morehead


From:
Prague, Oklahoma, USA - R.I.P.
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 8:02 pm    
Reply with quote

LDGs. They spanned from '73 to the '80's, and came with the changers of the times--every changer Shobud introduced from the single/single on. The best LDG year is the first year run--the '73 round front cabinet with single/single changer and barrels behind two-hole pullers. But they are very scarce. YMMV
_________________
"Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement"~old cowboy proverb.
shobud@windstream.net
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chas smith R.I.P.


From:
Encino, CA, USA
Post  Posted 1 Sep 2014 8:38 pm    
Reply with quote

'64 Permanent "under" and top. to be honest, I did some slight mods when I made the pillow blocks and remade the changer housings:





A Fingertip changer (not mine):
View user's profile Send private message
Jason Putnam


From:
Tennessee, USA
Post  Posted 2 Sep 2014 6:05 am    
Reply with quote

I don't understand why they got away from the barrels behind two hole pullers.I can understand doing away with the racks, because of all the extra weight and noise. But the two hole puller system is fantastic. Works like a charm and its very easy to work on. Was it a cost thing? Or a We have got to do this because everyone else is kind of thing?
_________________
1967 Emmons Bolt On, 1995 Mullen PRP 3x5,Nashville 112, JOYO Digital Delay, Goodrich Volume Pedal, Livesteel Strings
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Brint Hannay

 

From:
Maryland, USA
Post  Posted 2 Sep 2014 6:33 am    
Reply with quote

Another historical question I've wondered about:

How did the system using barrels originate? Were barrels used in some previously existing mechanical system, or did Shot or someone else dream them up specifically for steel?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Skip Edwards

 

From:
LA,CA
Post  Posted 2 Sep 2014 9:59 am    
Reply with quote

I think it was a case of trying to improve something that really didn't need improving. That's open for debate, though... the new system offered better timing of the pulls, splits, etc. And yeah, every other maker of steels was making changers that offered discrete multiple raises and lowers, so they were just keeping up with the market and their competition.
I agree about the 2 holers/barrel setup... it was, and still is a great system.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Billings


From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 2 Sep 2014 2:21 pm    
Reply with quote

"How did the system using barrels originate?"

I don't know, but,,,perhaps,,,, If you look at the pics of the perm that Chas posted, you can see they were using non-adjustable collars behind the pullers. Well not non-adjustable, but not easily adjustable. So maybe they came up with the barrels as easily "adjustable" collars?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tom Gorr

 

From:
Three Hills, Alberta
Post  Posted 26 Sep 2014 3:35 pm    
Reply with quote

Rebooting this thread because it was linked to by a more recent thread...

Curious to know more about the fingertip. I've heard they were difficult to keep in tune.

Some guys have said permanents and professional and two hole puller models sounded best, where do fingertips sit in the mix?

Also, what are relative valuations on good condition bversions of these different models?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
James Morehead


From:
Prague, Oklahoma, USA - R.I.P.
Post  Posted 26 Sep 2014 5:31 pm    
Reply with quote

Tom, Fingertips are no different than any other guitar--if set-up right and maintained right, they stay dead-on in tune. Neglect them, they get resentful.

You might look up Charlie Pride/Panther Hall album--Lloyd cut that live album with a fingertip called the "Lightening Bolt". That was done through a Twin Reverb with 12" D120f's.

Also note the Sweetheart of the Rodeo album with the Byrds--done on the same guitar and a Deluxe Reverb.

Wilburn Brothers Show with Hal Rugg--fingertip, sometimes a perm.

Earnest Tubb with Charleton--fingertip, sometimes a perm. So yes, fingertips are right in the middle of tone heaven. So yes, we could go on and on--Fingertips deserve MUCH respect.

the below link shows Lloyd playing the lightening Bolt. Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRYOTlA0i7U Smile
_________________
"Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement"~old cowboy proverb.
shobud@windstream.net
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mark Nix


From:
Arkansas, USA
Post  Posted 26 Sep 2014 7:23 pm    
Reply with quote

What about the screw type swivel and threaded pull rods? My pro II was built in late 73 (October I believe, I'll have to find the paper that says when) and has some slide swivels and barrels and some screw type swivels and threaded rods, they are all hex key tuning ends.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
James Morehead


From:
Prague, Oklahoma, USA - R.I.P.
Post  Posted 27 Sep 2014 3:24 am    
Reply with quote

Mark Nix wrote:
What about the screw type swivel and threaded pull rods? My pro II was built in late 73 (October I believe, I'll have to find the paper that says when) and has some slide swivels and barrels and some screw type swivels and threaded rods, they are all hex key tuning ends.


You have the best year run of the Pro II that ever was. Treasure that jewel!! Cool
_________________
"Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement"~old cowboy proverb.
shobud@windstream.net
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 27 Sep 2014 3:37 am    
Reply with quote

SHO-BUD.. as stated...

I think the best systems were the two hole puller systems with the barrels behind them. Many confuse that with single raise single lower changers. All the pull raises /lowers are done at the cross shaft with the barrels behind the pullers. The only restriction is how many peds and knee levers do you have as well as the length of the pull rod...

The LDG's cross several variations..two hole pullers all the way to the last generation of cast pullers...keep in mind, an LDG started life as a D10 with the lower neck and mechanics removed.
_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders , Eastman Mandolin ,
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Brint Hannay

 

From:
Maryland, USA
Post  Posted 27 Sep 2014 9:56 am    
Reply with quote

Mark Nix wrote:
What about the screw type swivel and threaded pull rods? My pro II was built in late 73 (October I believe, I'll have to find the paper that says when) and has some slide swivels and barrels and some screw type swivels and threaded rods, they are all hex key tuning ends.

What is meant by "screw type swivels and threaded rods"? Is this referring to the swivels that attach the pull rod by a set screw, or is there a different variant where the pull rod threads through the swivel?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mark Nix


From:
Arkansas, USA
Post  Posted 27 Sep 2014 12:57 pm    
Reply with quote




9 are like that on e9, the rest are barrels, and all barrels on c6.

Pedal 3 raises 5 with a barrel and p1 raises it with the threading



Between the two barrels on the left you can see a little nylon washer type thing on the threading. That's the p1 5string raise. It's the only one with a barrel and threaded one on the same pull. It's also the only threaded one with a nylon washer
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mark Nix


From:
Arkansas, USA
Post  Posted 27 Sep 2014 1:01 pm    
Reply with quote

James Morehead wrote:
Mark Nix wrote:
What about the screw type swivel and threaded pull rods? My pro II was built in late 73 (October I believe, I'll have to find the paper that says when) and has some slide swivels and barrels and some screw type swivels and threaded rods, they are all hex key tuning ends.


You have the best year run of the Pro II that ever was. Treasure that jewel!! Cool


She sounds as pretty as she looks. Smile can't complain about having a franklin sr custom built guitar! (for Tommy White I might add!)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron