| Author |
Topic: for reece anderson msa d-12 |
Paul Wade
From:
mundelein,ill
|
|
|
 |
David Kellogg
From:
Tualatin, OR
|
Posted 21 Dec 2010 7:25 am beautiful |
|
| Boy that looks like it is brand new. One thing I can tell you it is very, very heavy. |
|
|
|
Jim Smith
From:
Midlothian, TX, USA
|
Posted 21 Dec 2010 6:44 pm
|
|
| "The Universal" on the front looks original, but I've never seen, and don't know why that name would be on a double neck guitar. Hopefully Reece can explain that too. |
|
|
|
Paul Wade
From:
mundelein,ill
|
Posted 22 Dec 2010 5:22 am
|
|
| ttt |
|
|
|
Lee Baucum
From:
McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) The Final Frontier
|
Posted 22 Dec 2010 6:42 am
|
|
| Very interesting. Maybe an extended E9 on one neck and a universal tuning on the other? |
|
|
|
David Kellogg
From:
Tualatin, OR
|
Posted 22 Dec 2010 1:08 pm maybe
|
|
| I would think that this ax would be called the "Universal Universal" |
|
|
|
Rich Peterson
From:
Moorhead, MN
|
Posted 22 Dec 2010 6:09 pm
|
|
It has 2 3+3 changers, but doesn't use the extra pulls. I think its just extended Nashville and extended Texas.
Stunningly beautiful, though. Wish I had the cash. And a burly roadie to carry it. Could put a Jeff Neumann on one neck and a Zane King on the other. |
|
|
|
Reece Anderson
From:
Keller Texas USA, R.I.P.
|
Posted 23 Dec 2010 6:44 am
|
|
At this time I believe the guitar was originally made as a single 12 on a double neck body. In those days we used completed double neck endplates on guitars with a pad on the back neck and placed a "cap" over the tuning end exposed hole on the bottom neck.
It appears to me the bottom neck is a slightly different color, so possibly some one removed the neck from another guitar and placed it on the cabinet.
Were I to have the serial number, I believe I could solve the mystery. If it left the factory as a double 12, that would indeed be a one of a kind, in which case I can't imagine how that could have happened without my knowledge. |
|
|
|
