| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic My Turn To Rant !
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  My Turn To Rant !
John P. Phillips


From:
Folkston, Ga. U.S.A., R.I.P.
Post  Posted 5 Jan 2009 7:26 pm    
Reply with quote

I gotta get this off my chest.
I hear a lot and see a lot of threads that blame the D.J's
among the crowd that is blamed for the course that music has followed.
As a former radio employee ans sometimes executive,
I must state that the Disc Jockey is not to blame for this.
The music playlist and even the rotation process is decided at most
stations by the higher ups, the main decision makers. Some stations even subscribe to
companys that tell you what to what and when to play songs.
The D.J's in most cases have very little if anything to say
about the music they play at any given time.
Some of you ex-jocks need to chime in with your experiences in this area.
I was a big proponent of inserting good music by local talent that
I thought was worthy of airplay but was seldom allowed to do so.
When I became a program director, I did this as often as I could
but was often called on the carpet for doing so.
This was a very frustrating situation to be in, and I just had to get this
off my chest.
Your comments, pro or con, are appreciated.
_________________
Just remember,
You don�t stop playing cause you get older,
You get older cause you stop playing ! http://www.myspace.com/johnpphillips
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jody Sanders

 

From:
Magnolia,Texas, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 5 Jan 2009 8:11 pm    
Reply with quote

Well said, John. Jody.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Leslie Ehrlich


From:
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Post  Posted 5 Jan 2009 9:45 pm    
Reply with quote

The managers are the villains. Seems like it's that way with a lot of businesses these days.
_________________
Sho-Bud Pro III + Marshall JMP 2204 half stack = good grind!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
LJ Eiffert

 

From:
California, USA
Post  Posted 5 Jan 2009 10:49 pm    
Reply with quote

Hello John P.Phillips,as you know it's a hand full of Organizations who are all in bed with this Topic.Now,if you was to name the heads of each Organization in control of the combination sweetheart deal that it takes to get airplay you would have to be in the Union of each who pay each other off in what they say is business. The atmosphere of this Topic you ask for one's opinion can't stay as such because it's to diminish. That's why you don't and won't hear great songs or records by indie Artist on major radio stations.Only them little ones on college campus. This is a great start for the ones who are looking in on what we write about this Topic.Let's get deep into this one. Thanks John,sincerely in music,Leo J.Eiffert,Jr.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Perlowin


From:
Los Angeles CA
Post  Posted 5 Jan 2009 11:50 pm    
Reply with quote

Once upon a time it wasn't like that. In 1967 I worked briefly at an "underground rock" radio station where the DJs were given a 100% free hand to play whatever they wanted. Obscure album cuts, unknown bands, whatever, No restrictions on the music whatsoever.

Too bad it didn't last.
_________________
Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
David Doggett


From:
Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 7:15 am    
Reply with quote

Yes, I remember that the first FM album rock stations in the '60s had DJs who listened to the promo albums as they came in, and picked their favorites to play on the air. AM was all top 40 management picks. The new rock FM stations were where rock fans heard all the new groups. I think this is one of major factors in all the new music of the late '60s and early '70s. And I believe to some extend it carried all the way into New Wave music of the '80s. But gradually all the FM rock stations came under management top 40 control. Now there are two places to hear some new music: college stations and new internet stations.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Barry Blackwood


Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 8:52 am    
Reply with quote

The D.J.'s I usually blame for our musical ills, are the self-appointed, so-called D.J.'s that spin the CD's on the breaks at your local bars. Together with the line dancers, they have pretty much obliterated what's left of the clubs that once hired bands. My 2¢ of course. Oh Well
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Marlin Smoot


From:
Kansas
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 9:44 am     Aor - Top 40
Reply with quote

FM stations in the 1960's had much more freedom simply because stations owners really didn't know what to do with them - most people didn't have FM radios at home, GM; Ford; etc... didn't install them into cars until much later in the 1970's and more so into the 1980's. FM radio stations in the 1960's are much like HD radios now - hardly anyone has one and currently not mass produced into cars.

Today, ratings are sold to agencys and local clients (more so in major markets) and it's important for stations to play the most researched hits. It's why people listen to the radio. They want to hear the hits and they want to hear them a lot.

Ratings points are worth a lot of money and when a station isn't playing the right music the ratings can have a huge impact on revenue if they lose ratings. The same can be true for TV in your local market.

There won't be many people on this forum that will agree with that - I understand.

There is so much music that is sent to radio stations every year (about 600 singles) from major labels that any 'indy' artist is going to have a tough time getting any airplay. Look at the top 10 songs on Billboard and you'll find they are for the most part major labels - they have the promotional power to 'work' the records up the chart - leaving the indys in the dust... However, sometimes a great song can get into the top - exception, not the rule

There's a lot more to this topic than I'm writing here and I'm not the expert... but I do know this when it comes to getting airplay... The bottom line is: it all comes down to money.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Leslie Ehrlich


From:
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 6:04 pm     Re: Aor - Top 40
Reply with quote

Marlin Smoot wrote:
Today, ratings are sold to agencys and local clients (more so in major markets) and it's important for stations to play the most researched hits. It's why people listen to the radio. They want to hear the hits and they want to hear them a lot.


And like that old saying goes: 'Familiarity breeds contempt'.

Marlin Smoot wrote:
Ratings points are worth a lot of money and when a station isn't playing the right music the ratings can have a huge impact on revenue if they lose ratings. The same can be true for TV in your local market.


So that's why I see so much crappy American programming on Canadian TV.


Marlin Smoot wrote:
There is so much music that is sent to radio stations every year (about 600 singles) from major labels that any 'indy' artist is going to have a tough time getting any airplay. Look at the top 10 songs on Billboard and you'll find they are for the most part major labels - they have the promotional power to 'work' the records up the chart - leaving the indys in the dust... However, sometimes a great song can get into the top - exception, not the rule.


And again, the managers are the villains. They think only about the money and not the quality of the music.
_________________
Sho-Bud Pro III + Marshall JMP 2204 half stack = good grind!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ken Lang


From:
Simi Valley, Ca
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 7:34 pm    
Reply with quote

You want to know whose responsible for country music evolving?
Look in the mirror.
You evolved to pedal steel. You tossed the upright bass for an electric. You added drums. You added a sound system. You wrote a song with the odd chord. You played a song upbeat and interesting instead of the same old drab way. Etc..... I'm an old geezer but I like songs with some fun in them and a little life. The old 3 chord Hank songs are cool, but their still old.

Now look at your kids-and grandkids. They are not really into old, old stuff. They are young, they want young things, young music.

We are all to blame for the evolution to one degree or another. I say we better learn to tolerate it, just like our parents tolerated us, even though we were going to hell in a hand basket. Come on man, bend that 3rd a little flat now and then.
_________________
heavily medicated for your safety
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 7:34 pm    
Reply with quote

I feel your pain, John. The problem isn't radio DJs, nor is it really the management - they're just doing what they will do when allowed to run unfettered by any standards or regulations - do whatever it takes to make the maximum amount of money.

IMO, the problem is the FCC, the Congress, and many administrations, who have allowed unprecedented concentration of ownership of broadcast media into what amounts to an oligopoly. Until this cartel is broken and smaller (and especially local) players are allowed to enter into this business, there's no chance for any type of real programming diversity. The fallacy in the current approach is the notion that these companies, or the FCC and Congress, "own" the bandwidth. The people of the United States own the bandwidth - it is supposed to be managed in OUR interest - everybody's - and that hasn't been happening for a long time now.

The incoming administration has stated that it wants to do things to create more diversity. We'll see. A bunch of interesting links on this subject are here: http://www.benton.org/node/8000

Note the wide diversity of political views that agree with this, going from people like Trent Lott (R-MS) to Diane Feinstein (D-CA) to Obama. I am actually hopeful.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Leslie Ehrlich


From:
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 8:00 pm    
Reply with quote

Dave Mudgett wrote:
...unprecedented concentration of ownership of broadcast media into what amounts to an oligopoly.


Is this not a management philosophy? Bigger is better? Increasing their share of the market? Taking over or squeezing out smaller competitors?

The media corporations wanted the rules changed so they could gain greater control of the industry.
_________________
Sho-Bud Pro III + Marshall JMP 2204 half stack = good grind!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 8:39 pm    
Reply with quote

Quote:
The media corporations wanted the rules changed so they could gain greater control of the industry.

Of course they wanted the rules relaxed. But blaming them is like blaming the fox for taking away the guard dog and the fence around the chicken house. Foxes will be foxes, that's why we need guard dogs and chicken wire. Smile
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jeff Hyman


From:
West Virginia, USA
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 9:15 pm    
Reply with quote

Dave... I thought Chicken wire was to keep the Chickens in the pen, not keep the fox out of the pen. :-)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 6 Jan 2009 10:18 pm    
Reply with quote

Well, I think it does some of both. The rules are the chicken wire, the FCC is supposed to be the guard dawg. But I think that dawg has been takin' a long nap after bein' fed some nice, juicy dawg bones by the foxes.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Gordy Hall


From:
Fairfax, CA.
Post  Posted 7 Jan 2009 10:18 am    
Reply with quote

When I was in high school I got interested in becoming a DJ, and at the time FM had just begun to play rock and folk kind of things. I took classes, had a late-night shift, and had a lot of fun.

Then I met the #1 AM disc jockey at the time in the area (SoCal) and he introduced me to the hard realities of the job...including kissing the butt of the program directors & management that had little knowledge of music or the audience, but lots of interest in selling ads as the main focus. He got suddenly fired and replaced by a tape deck, and I decided that as a 'career' being a DJ was not worth it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bo Borland


From:
South Jersey -
Post  Posted 7 Jan 2009 2:54 pm    
Reply with quote

I spent quite a few years as on air talent in radio. It started to be a job when the FCC deregulated radio and big fish ate the small fish. They hired consultants and took the music away from the people who knew and understood it and started compiling play lists based on what a small but very vocal number of people wanted. These people were mostly stay at home housewives who listened all day and called in all the time. That was what started the Kenny ROgers, Crystal Gayle, Lee Greenwood years or bad country radio. Nashville didn't help much with the synthesizer replacing everything and little or no steel, fiddle , etc..

I don't listen to very much local radio anymore prefer to spend most of my time at Willies Place and the other Sirius channels and spend my morning drive with Howard Stern.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Billy Tonnesen

 

From:
R.I.P., Buena Park, California
Post  Posted 7 Jan 2009 3:30 pm    
Reply with quote

In Southern California in the 50's and 60's the DJ's pretty much had control over what they played on the Country Stations. (Charlie Williams, Joe Allison, Biff Collie, etc.} If any local bands cut a decent record with a small record company, or a demo record, they could take it up to the Radio Station and be on the air for an interview and get their record played. KFOX, KXLA, etc. The DJ's even became guest stars at the clubs and dances.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LJ Eiffert

 

From:
California, USA
Post  Posted 7 Jan 2009 3:47 pm    
Reply with quote

Right on Billy, them Jockies were Larry Scott,Chuck Sullivan,Bill Patterson,Lee Ross,Don Hillman,Harry Newman,Paul Bowman,Skip Gray,Chuck Wilder,Cliffie Stone and many others. Leo
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Gambrell

 

From:
Over there
Post  Posted 8 Jan 2009 12:06 am    
Reply with quote

Ken Lang wrote:
You want to know whose responsible for country music evolving?
Look in the mirror.
You evolved to pedal steel. You tossed the upright bass for an electric. You added drums. You added a sound system. You wrote a song with the odd chord. You played a song upbeat and interesting instead of the same old drab way. Etc..... I'm an old geezer but I like songs with some fun in them and a little life. The old 3 chord Hank songs are cool, but their still old.

Now look at your kids-and grandkids. They are not really into old, old stuff. They are young, they want young things, young music.

We are all to blame for the evolution to one degree or another. I say we better learn to tolerate it, just like our parents tolerated us, even though we were going to hell in a hand basket. Come on man, bend that 3rd a little flat now and then.


100% CORRECT, KEN! When country stations started making fun of bluegrass music, when TV shows started showing "Cousin" Roy Clark as a musical savant, "Hee Haw's" animated chickens, Chet Atkins' and Owen Bradley adding strings, sweetening, and that infernal Wurlitzer electric piano---People fell for it. Don't blame Clear Channel, or the promo folks.
Steve Gambrell, former college radio DJ.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Perlowin


From:
Los Angeles CA
Post  Posted 8 Jan 2009 12:33 am    
Reply with quote

Stephen Gambrell wrote:
When country stations started making fun of bluegrass music, when TV shows started showing "Cousin" Roy Clark as a musical savant, "Hee Haw's" animated chickens,.....


I wonder if the images on TV depicting people from the South or Appalachia as stupid, toothless, cousin-marrying Neanderthal idiots on such programs as The Beverly Hillbillies, and even Hee Haw were a factor in this.
_________________
Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 8 Jan 2009 1:10 am    
Reply with quote

Quote:
We are all to blame for the evolution to one degree or another. I say we better learn to tolerate it, just like our parents tolerated us, even though we were going to hell in a hand basket. Come on man, bend that 3rd a little flat now and then.

Quote:
When country stations started making fun of bluegrass music, when TV shows started showing "Cousin" Roy Clark as a musical savant, "Hee Haw's" animated chickens, Chet Atkins' and Owen Bradley adding strings, sweetening, and that infernal Wurlitzer electric piano---People fell for it.

Hey, I love to bend my thirds flat, and I fully expect evolution. I don't expect to go back to Hee Haw, Lawrence Welk, or schmaltzy string-backed pop-country that kids make fun of. Bluegrass is a big part of country music's future, and I always chided mainstream country for their attitude towards it. Bluegrass is something that many, many young people can relate to because it's real. Don't think all or even most young people are as superficial as they are reputed to be.

So I'm sorry, but I disagree that this is about tolerating our kids' music. I'm fine with my own kid's music, and she listens to mine plenty. The last 10 years, I'm always the oldest guy in the band, and the last band I was in before I reverted back to my old Americana band are all under 30 and two of the guys are the sons of friends my age. I don't think this is a generation gap. Most of my college students listen to their ipods, not the pathetic radio.

Penn State has a student radio station, and for the most part, it's pretty good - certainly the best thing on the air around here, by far. Except for the official university NPR station, which plays mostly the standard generic classical, jazz, and folk shows you hear on NPR, everything else here is strictly corporate-run crap that repeat the same short playlists many times a day and beamed like a laser to a very small number of specific demographic groups. This is not media run in the public interest - these media companies do not own the airwaves, but are leasing them and we can take away the lease any time we want if we just have the balls to do it. I couldn't care less about the "media industry". They don't have a right to make money on our backs without performing a service to the public.

I wouldn't expect satellite radio to fill the gap either. As was discussed on another thread, that is turning the corner also. This is about oligopoly control of the media sources. We need to see major changes that bring back a lot more local control and diversity, and a breakup of the oligopoly. This reaches far past the media, but goes right back 100 years to Teddy Roosevelt and the robber barons, but that would take us too far afield.

I, personally, will be fine with whatever happens if people can just take the airwaves back and it evolves whatever way it wants to. If what people really want to hear is dreck, so be it. But I don't believe it for a minute. If a certain percentage of the bandwidth was reserved for local control, I think there would be major changes, and plenty of people would tune in. I guess I'm not as cynical as many of you.

My opinions, of course.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Cleat Wooley

 

From:
Louisiana, USA * R.I.P.
Post  Posted 8 Jan 2009 8:51 am    
Reply with quote

IT's ALL about BIG BUiSNEST., 'MONEY' .The signs of the time. Rolling Eyes
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
W. C. Edgar


From:
Iowa City Iowa, Madison CT, Nashville, Austin, Phoenix
Post  Posted 8 Jan 2009 8:53 am    
Reply with quote

No it's not the DJ's fault but it is the managements fault. It's a little word called payola which means
Quote:
pay for play
. Anything can be made "popular", thats why they call it
Quote:
"programming"
its the same as
Quote:
brainwashing
. There used to be a day when an independent artist could drop his record off at any station and they'd "give it a spin". Today there are about 5 large conglomerate's that own eighty percent of all the radio stations in the US. Of the above mentioned are Jones Satellite, Comcast, Clear Channel and more. It's not about music and having a good song or a good voice anymore. It's all about how much money can you make me because any artist is just a marketable comodity. Example:when Shania Twains label needed a hit they sent the new single to radio with 1.6 million dollars and it was to be played for 12-16 weeks 40 times in each 24 hour period. If you think this isn't the way things are done you are sadly mistaken but this is the kind of corporate crap we are up against. When we worked the Music Row & Billboard Charts with my first release the radio promotion folks wanted to know what else we could "chip in". What they meant was could we give away a free vacation or a free trip somewhere for them playing the record? Still, I write several songs a week own all my publishing and record with the best players in the world "Mike Johnson" and hope that someday I'll slip through the cracks and be the one in a million that beat the system.
Quote:
I don't want all the pie, just a little slice.

WC Edgar

www.wcedgar.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 8 Jan 2009 9:28 am    
Reply with quote

Yup, WC - I agree with all that. But I think the only solution is to take the oligopoly control of these small number of broadcast giants away. In a large corporation, management's duty to themselves and shareholders is to make the maximum profit possible. In this case, their goals are not in line with the public's. This is not a normal business - they are supposed to operate in the public interest with licenses to use the bandwidth owned by the American people - the FCC is supposed to be an honest broker for our interests.

Solution: Radically broaden the base of people and companies in that business so their goals and the peoples' goals can be aligned. Again - anybody in this business operates on a license to use the bandwidth owned by the American people. This needs to happen generally across American industry, but the broadcast industry is one of the most glaring examples of abuse, IMHO. I agree that brainwashing is the operational term here.

A trailer for the DVD "Before the Music Dies" came up on another thread - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwIiYvLVyZU

And yes - I and many others are calling for a revolt. It has to start somewhere, and the grassroots is the only place it can start. It isn't just about country music - it's any music. IMHO.

WC - I certainly hope you are able to break through. Your music kicks ass.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron