Author |
Topic: Noob Question: E9 History |
Carl Morris
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
Posted 9 Jun 2008 6:03 pm
|
|
I know, this looks like flame-bait, but that isn't my intention. I've searched the forum and Google and still have questions.
When I look at the C6 copedent, I can see what the inventor was going for. When I look at E9, it's a bit more confusing. Especially strings 1 and 2. I recognize that if I want to play a fast scale-like run in that range, I can do it faster with a string for every note, but is that really worth all the extra mechanicals? I'm not understanding why there isn't just a pedal or lever to drop 3,4 to the 1,2 pitches, or vice-versa. If I could get to every note without those strings, what makes them so important?
Basically I'm at the noob stage where I'd be perfectly happy with an 8-string made from a U12 minus 1,2,7,10 plus a custom pedal setting or two, and wondering why I shouldn't just buy an 8-string Lonestar set up that way and be done with it? I guess part of the issue is that my primary interests are older country, blues, and rock. I don't really listen much to newer country, so I have no idea what people are playing that makes the extra features of E9 critical?
Links to videos, constructive insults, or anything else enlightening is appreciated. _________________ Carl Morris
http://cdmorris.com/music/ |
|
|
|
Donny Hinson
From: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
|
Posted 9 Jun 2008 6:38 pm
|
|
Quote: |
I can do it faster with a string for every note, but is that really worth all the extra mechanicals? I'm not understanding why there isn't just a pedal or lever to drop 3,4 to the 1,2 pitches, or vice-versa. If I could get to every note without those strings, what makes them so important? |
Well, I'm certainly no musical whiz or famous player, but I'll take a crack at this one.
My take is that it's how the notes work together. With a steel, it's much more a question of how the notes flow and "hang". Whereas, with a straight guitar, it's usually just playing notes in succession. Sure, you could lower the 3rd and get the same note you're getting on the 1st, but the two notes ringing together, that narrow interval, is part of the E9th sound. The same can be said of the 2nd string - you can get that note by just dropping the 4th or even the 3rd, but then those notes wouldn't be available at the same time, either. Having all the notes available at the same time is different, and gives you more chordal possibilities, and many more unique sounds, than you get by just pedaling or moving the bar to get the same notes.
Having no lessons or learning material when I started playing, I changed the tuning on my first pedal steel to eliminate the chromatic notes on the 1st and 2nd strings - but I rapidly replaced them after I saw a really good player and how he used them! |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 9 Jun 2008 8:36 pm
|
|
Once you understand the system, you'll find that you can change grips faster than you can move the bar or push a pedal. The main reason for those "extra" strings is the convenience of having all of the notes of the scale available in each of 7 different fret positions, with a minimum of pedal movement.
This will enable you to pick any scale notes you want at the current fret and slide them up or down to the next position, and then grip any other scale notes you want and slide them, etc. More notes at each fret allows for smoother transitions and phrasing. _________________ -𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Chris Scruggs
From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
|
Posted 10 Jun 2008 9:21 am
|
|
Buddy Emmons was the first to put the high F# and Ed strings on E9. He did it in the early '60s, played it on "Half A Mind" by Ernest Tubb, thought of giving up on them and then noticed other players were starting to do it, too. He figured it would sure be ridiculous if his playing style was out of date thanks to his own innovation and then it became standard.
Letting those first two strings ring out with the rest of the "inside" tuning is just as integral to the sound of pedal steel guitar in the last 45 years as the pedals are.
However, as a traditional country musician, nothing gets on my nerves more than a pedal steel player who uses those "in between" notes all the time on '40s and '50s country. It just effects the timelessness for me. Take them off if you want to mess with the eight string core tuning. The high two strings were meant to add to what was an eight string tuning. So then when you put them back on it will make more sense.
Use them with taste. A lot of younger players use those first two strings as an excuse to never move their left hand. Find all the places you can to get the notes you want.
Oh, and don't underestimate the value of the 9th string! Alot of new players are dropping this string and missing out on the 7th that makes E9th a 9th!
CS
PS, keep in mind everyone's opinions are different, and this opinion is coming from a guy whose only PSG is a 1957 eight string Fender 400 (with E as the highest string, not even G#) and mostly plays nonpedal. But from how you describe yourself, it seems our musical tastes are similar. |
|
|
|
Carl Morris
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
Posted 10 Jun 2008 11:58 am
|
|
Thanks for the replies, you're all making sense in different ways. I hadn't thought about wanting to make close interval chords, pretty much all the music I play tends to stick to triads with maybe a few standard extensions at the top of the chord. I hadn't though about maybe wanting an 8 along with my 7 and/or 9 sometimes, for example, I figured the root had that covered.
Bob's response sounds the most official/textbook, but in my noobiness it's the one I understand least. I'll have to see what comes along that makes those things matter to me.
Thanks again. _________________ Carl Morris
http://cdmorris.com/music/ |
|
|
|
Jeremy Threlfall
From: now in Western Australia
|
|
|
|
Carl Morris
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
Posted 10 Jun 2008 8:15 pm
|
|
I'm getting a 404 for that, I'll try it again tomorrow. _________________ Carl Morris
http://cdmorris.com/music/ |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Threlfall
From: now in Western Australia
|
Posted 10 Jun 2008 8:33 pm
|
|
Ah - I see the error in my ways (the 'ol FORUM5 trick)
thanks, B0B
that was a great thread - I read it often for fun |
|
|
|
Carl Morris
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
Posted 10 Jun 2008 9:05 pm
|
|
Fun read, hilarious storytelling . Thanks, that was what I was looking for and didn't find in my searches. _________________ Carl Morris
http://cdmorris.com/music/ |
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
Posted 11 Jun 2008 5:57 pm
|
|
Here one for the 1st string. I know your guitar won't do this but if you put your finger out behind the bar and pull it over you can pull it a 1/2 step. with A and B or just A pedal down out pops Mooney.
http://www.gregcutshaw.com/Tab/Swinging%20Doors.pdf
A lot of magic lays in the 1,2,7 and 9th string |
|
|
|
Carl Morris
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
Posted 11 Jun 2008 8:49 pm
|
|
Hi Norris,
Thanks for the examples, I got about halfway into the first one and my wife started complaining about her computer not being able to see the network, and of course that was the end of any hope of doing anything productive the rest of the night.
I assume you were talking about the intro for the first one. I didn't see any use of the 1 or 2 strings in the turnaround. It seems to me that using the 4 string sounds fine right up until you need it for something else but you want it to keep ringing the previous note. Is that what you meant by not sounding the same?
I'll have to look at the last one tomorrow. Dick Meis showed me the pull-the-string-behind-the-bar trick when I was at his house...pretty tricky . _________________ Carl Morris
http://cdmorris.com/music/ |
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
Posted 12 Jun 2008 7:47 am
|
|
Hi Carl. Nice to hear from you. Yes it is the intro in to that song. I think in a sense thats what I'm saying. Remember to your equal temp tuning plays a part in here to.
Heres a lick that has been around I'm guessing from the 60's. Go up the the 8th fret , hit 2,3,5 then A&B down,let off A&B slide down 2 frets then end on on fret 3 4,5,6 A&B down. Or don't slide down and pull the bar off 2 slide up 2 frets to 10 4,5,6 AB down then slide back to fret 8 as you roll off the pedals. Simple and very pretty stuff.
4 things I most hated about the pedal steel when I started
String 1
string 2
string 7
string 9 |
|
|
|
Twayn Williams
From: Portland, OR
|
Posted 12 Jun 2008 12:37 pm
|
|
I usually ignore the top 2 strings. However, if you have a knee lever set up to lower the 2nd string by a 1/2 step you can play a 3rds harmonized scale in a very logical fashion. EX:
Key of C:
fret 1: Cmaj no lever
fret 3: Dmin w/lever
fret 5: Emin w/lever
fret 6: Fmaj no lever
fret 8: Gmaj no lever
fret 10: Amin w/lever
fret 12: Bmin(dim) w/lever
fret 13: Cmaj no lever
Also, if strings 6-5-4 are your major I chord, then strings 5-2-1 are your V chord. If you play a V and a I together, you have a Imaj9, ex:
C-E-G + G-B-D
Having said all this, I've removed the D(9th) from my guitar. I got sick of hitting that 7th all the time. Seems to be in a bad range for me. I figured I'd rather have a power chord on the bottom and retuned my bottom 3 strings to E-B-E. I wouldn't recommend this to start with though. _________________ Primitive Utility Steel |
|
|
|
Carl Morris
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
|
Posted 12 Jun 2008 6:39 pm
|
|
Thanks guys. This is all a bit strange to me, this whole learning licks from tab thing. I'm more used to learning my way around an instrument and then thinking in terms of what key I'm in rather than what lick I'm trying to play. Nevertheless, these things are all helping me try things I wouldn't have thought of on my own. I am really liking how that intro to Too Cold at Home works.
I'm still not sure whether I'll end up leaving the low strings alone, but I'm convinced that keeping 1 and 2 are worth the hassle now. _________________ Carl Morris
http://cdmorris.com/music/ |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 12 Jun 2008 7:27 pm
|
|
Carl Morris wrote: |
I'm still not sure whether I'll end up leaving the low strings alone, but I'm convinced that keeping 1 and 2 are worth the hassle now. |
My work here is done. |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 13 Jun 2008 5:25 am
|
|
I thought those first two strings were crazy, but with the help of b0b and others, I saw the error or my ways. I even use the D lever now! _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
|
|
|
Brian Pelky
From: Portland, OR
|
Posted 13 Jun 2008 12:19 pm City LIghts
|
|
Hi Norris, I'm checking out this link to City Lights tab. Does this tab show rythmically what's going on, or is that supposed to be assumed? _________________ Sho-Bud Super Pro D10,Tele,Strat,Martin D-28,Korg Triton Pro,Nashville 400 |
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
Posted 13 Jun 2008 12:30 pm
|
|
Brian here is the complete page. What you see and hear is what you get.
Edit a big foo foo was here
i just use TAB for a hint for playing. To many ways to write it I guess
Last edited by Norris Ashment on 13 Jun 2008 12:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
|
|
|
Norris Ashment
From: Idaho Falls Idaho, USA
|
Posted 13 Jun 2008 1:02 pm
|
|
I've had a lot of Email today about where some of these places were at with the Tab. I like to just go here and listen to the Intros and Breaks of the songs that were came out when I was a kid. Puts me right back on the farm
http://users.interlinks.net/rebel/steel/steel.html |
|
|
|