| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic stringmaster w/o legs?
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  stringmaster w/o legs?
Ron Victoria

 

From:
New Jersey, USA
Post  Posted 18 Oct 2007 2:55 am    
Reply with quote

The seller said this didn't have any leg sockets. Did Fender make them without legs?

Auction on eBay.

ron
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Michael Johnstone


From:
Sylmar,Ca. USA
Post  Posted 18 Oct 2007 3:36 am     Hack Job
Reply with quote

That's a neck off of a multi neck-Stringmaster.If it has no leg sockets,it's the middle neck of a triple or quad.If it's off a double,it'll have 2 sockets unless the sockets have been removed and the holes filled.The body shape,scale length and chrome diamonds are a dead givaway(they hide the bolts that connect the bodies of a multi-neck together and are un-necessary on a factory single)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 18 Oct 2007 7:12 am    
Reply with quote

This is a guitar I made from a section of a multi-neck Stringmaster. It had two leg sockets and I routed it out for a 3rd, center leg. The guitar is more set together now than when the picture was taken.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bill Leff


From:
Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Post  Posted 18 Oct 2007 7:23 am    
Reply with quote

I like your taste in carpets Erv!

Very Happy Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 18 Oct 2007 7:27 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks, Bill! Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jon Light


From:
Saugerties, NY
Post  Posted 28 Oct 2007 7:53 am    
Reply with quote

Well--this went for a startling $711.00. As an orphan Stringmaster neck, I expected a lot lower final price. I'd have loved to have it for a project but......
The buyer's Ebay activity indicates that he's not a novice so maybe he's got a better idea of the market than I do.
Unfortunately for him, a desperate bidder really jacked the final price at the end---I hate when that happens. (I'm not complaining. But it's so tantalizing when you think you've got a nice price and then someone bids and bids and bids in the last minute and still doesn't outbid you, resulting in nothing but a higher price---which always leads to the unsubstantiated suspicion that there's shill bidding involved.)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Alan Brookes


From:
Brummy living in Southern California
Post  Posted 28 Oct 2007 9:59 am    
Reply with quote

I don't think it's a Stringmaster, though it may be part of one. Confused Stringmasters were only made in 2, 3 or 4 neck configurations. The single neck models were known as the Deluxe-6 and Deluxe-8. You can usually distinguish between a Deluxe-8, and a Stringmaster which has been separated, by the control panel, which is rounded at the bottom on a Deluxe.

Compare this picture of the one sold to the conversion above.

I'm not familiar with every version of the Triple-neck Stringmaster, but it seems to me that this is a Deluxe-8.

...but Deluxe-8s usually had three legs.... Confused

Michael Johnstone wrote:
That's a neck off of a multi neck-Stringmaster.If it has no leg sockets,it's the middle neck of a triple or quad.If it's off a double, it'll have 2 sockets unless the sockets have been removed and the holes filled.The body shape,scale length and chrome diamonds are a dead givaway(they hide the bolts that connect the bodies of a multi-neck together and are un-necessary on a factory single)

I see your point about the legs, and the triangles would be unnecessary on a Deluxe. I would like to find out what the body depth is. On Stringmasters, as you know, the bodies of the necks had different depths so that the playing position was higher with each successive neck.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alan Brookes


From:
Brummy living in Southern California
Post  Posted 28 Oct 2007 4:14 pm    
Reply with quote

Alan F. Brookes wrote:
...You can usually distinguish between a Deluxe-8, and a Stringmaster which has been separated, by the control panel, which is rounded at the bottom on a Deluxe...

Since I wrote this I've been looking at the Stringmaster I'm working on. The control panels for a Stringmaster and a Deluxe-8 ARE different, but not in the way I mentioned. Embarassed
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alan Brookes


From:
Brummy living in Southern California
Post  Posted 28 Oct 2007 10:03 pm    
Reply with quote

Alan F. Brookes wrote:
The control panels for a Stringmaster and a Deluxe-8 ARE different, but not in the way I mentioned. Embarassed

I take back what I said originally. I've been doing some research. Here is what the control panel of a Deluxe-8 looks like...

(from an auction currently on eBay.)

Michael was right first time. It's the middle neck off a 3-Necked Stringmaster. Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 29 Oct 2007 6:33 am    
Reply with quote

I was looking at this guitar and would have liked to have had it. But not at anywheres close to the price it went for. I would have put legs on it and that would have meant buying and installing three leg brackets and legs, which would have driven the total investment up even more. Also the bridge cover is missing and finding one of those is like looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alan Brookes


From:
Brummy living in Southern California
Post  Posted 29 Oct 2007 4:57 pm    
Reply with quote

This conversion raises another question....

The diamonds are only found on the outside necks. If this is the center neck and has the diamonds on, then there must be two necks around with missing diamonds.

Erv Niehaus wrote:
... Also the bridge cover is missing and finding one of those is like looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack.

They're almost always missing for some reason. Maybe someone should make a batch for sale to collectors.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 6:43 am    
Reply with quote

Alan,
There has been some discussion about making bridge covers in the past. I think the cost is prohibitive for the tooling required to make them.

On the early Stringmasters, the covers were screwed down to the body of the guitar and were hardly ever removed.

On the later models, the cover was just attached to the ends of the bridge rod (so they could pivot to allow access to the blending knob) and were easily removed, for what reason I don't know.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Brad Bechtel


From:
San Francisco, CA
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 7:45 am    
Reply with quote

I would guess the bridge covers were made removable at the request of those players who liked picking close to the bridge, or who found that the bridge covers interefered with their normal hand position.
_________________
Brad’s Page of Steel
A web site devoted to acoustic & electric lap steel guitars
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 8:28 am    
Reply with quote

It is my guess that most of them were removed and used as ash trays. Laughing
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Dahms

 

From:
Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 9:11 am    
Reply with quote

They sometimes vibrate and buzz (the bridge covers). If you have multiple necks it can be frustrating.
_________________
Time flies like an eagle
Fruit flies like a banana.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pat Keiner

 

From:
Chicago, Illinois
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 6:41 pm    
Reply with quote

Jon,
Just wanted to let you know that I was the 'desperate bidder' and was trying to purchase it for my husband and was outbid at the last minute by the winner (who was also 'swooping' in at the last second). So, no shill bidding going on there - although my husband was shocked at how much it did go for (and glad I didn't go any higher). Whoa!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alan Brookes


From:
Brummy living in Southern California
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 6:51 pm    
Reply with quote

Brad Bechtel wrote:
I would guess the bridge covers were made removable at the request of those players who liked picking close to the bridge, or who found that the bridge covers interefered with their normal hand position.

I think you're right, Brad.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bill Creller

 

From:
Saginaw, Michigan, USA (deceased)
Post  Posted 30 Oct 2007 7:16 pm    
Reply with quote

The Hawaiian players, like Feet Rogers,Gabby Pahinui, Bobby Ingano etc, like some muted playing, so they remove the covers. But most likely, others just took them off for whatever reason and lost them.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron