| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic NV112 vs NV400
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  NV112 vs NV400
Harry C Clark

 

From:
Kingston Springs, Tennessee, USA
Post  Posted 28 Apr 2007 7:17 am    
Reply with quote

I've been considering trading my NV 400 for an NV112. My number one priority is tone. Weight is not a factor. I plan to try it out, of course, but would welcome input from players familiar with both amps. Can I expect better tone from the 112, (recognizing, of course, the subjective components involved in tone evaluation)?

Harry Clark
Kingston Springs, TN

Mullen HWP D-10, NV400, Hilton pedal
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jack Stoner


From:
Kansas City, MO
Post  Posted 28 Apr 2007 9:27 am    
Reply with quote

I had a NV400 that I used for about 8 years. I've been using a NV112 for a little over 2 years. I never really cared for the NV400 tone (and it had the factory tone mod), but outside of the old Session 500 I would rate the NV112 as great tone.

But, tone is very subjective and what one considers "great tone" someone else may not care for it.

You're not that far from Bobbe Seymour's shop. Take your guitar and NV400 with you and try out the 112 at Bobbe's with your guitar and compare it to your NV400.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Harry C Clark

 

From:
Kingston Springs, Tennessee, USA
Post  Posted 28 Apr 2007 12:36 pm     NV112 vs NV400
Reply with quote

Good plan and thanks.

Harry Clark
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bo Borland


From:
South Jersey -
Post  Posted 28 Apr 2007 4:43 pm    
Reply with quote

Harry, I used a 1st year Session 400/JBL since it was new, & still have it, but in the interest of saving my back, I bought a NV-112 from Bobbe.
While I still love the warmer tone of the S400, bottom line is.. I get a great sound from the NV112, and the difference is not worth the 35 lbs.
I agree with Jack , go try one out at Bobbe's
_________________
Bo Borland
Rittenberry SD10 , Derby D-10, Quilter TT12, Peavey Session 400 w/ JBL, NV112, Fender Blues Jr. , 1974 Dobro 60N squareneck, Rickenbacher NS lapsteel, 1973 Telecaster Thinline, 1979 blonde/black Frankenstrat
Currently picking with
Mason Dixon Band masondixonband.net
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Stan Paxton


From:
1/2 & 1/2 Florida and Tenn, USA (old Missouri boy gone South)
Post  Posted 28 Apr 2007 7:05 pm    
Reply with quote

Harry, I traded a N-400 for the N-112. The 400 had the factory mod, but my 112 gets closer to the tone of my vintage LTD400 that has the Ken Fox mod. Just according to my ears; others may have a different take on it... Cool
_________________
Mullen Lacquer SD 10, 3 & 5; Mullen Mica S 10 1/2 pad, 3 & 5; BJS Bars; LTD400, Nashville 112, DD-3, RV-3, Hilton VP . -- Gold Tone PBS sq neck; Wechter Scheerhorn sq neck. -- "Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone." -anon.-
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Brown

 

From:
Meridian, Mississippi USA
Post  Posted 30 Apr 2007 6:18 am     Peavey
Reply with quote

Thanks for using Peavey products.
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Mossburg


From:
AZ,
Post  Posted 30 Apr 2007 2:39 pm    
Reply with quote

I just returned from the show in Washington Pa. Great show and lineup of players. Tone is subjective but IMHO There was a local guy there that played an Emmons through 2 400's. In my opinion, it was the best tone in the show and there were some power players there. Clean, punchy, warm, defined,etc etc.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Larry Behm


From:
Mt Angel, Or 97362
Post  Posted 1 May 2007 4:15 am    
Reply with quote

Keep the 400, put in the Ken Fox mod and sit back.

Larry Behm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ken Metcalf


From:
San Antonio Texas USA
Post  Posted 1 May 2007 4:38 am    
Reply with quote

1-12 is good but a NV,400 has cleaner bottem end.
Old Session 400s are a hair better yet.

Ken
_________________
MSA 12 String E9th/B6th Universal.
Little Walter PF-89.
Bunch of stomp boxes
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Gary Preston


From:
Columbus, Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 3 May 2007 5:27 pm    
Reply with quote

Smile I have two of the Nashville 400 amps and i get great tone with both . I am considering getting a ''112'' just because of the weight . My buddie has two of the ''112's'' and he gets a good sound from those ! I do agree with Larry ''keep the 400's '' ! G.P.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Travis Toy


From:
Nashville, TN, USA
Post  Posted 3 May 2007 6:04 pm    
Reply with quote

Well...for me it depends on the situation. If I was playing a live club gig, and I was depending on my amp to carry the whole room (no P.A., mic, etc.) I would stick with the 400. In about any other situation I would go with the 112. The 112 is all I've been using in the studio for the past 2 1/2 years. I love it. I have actually been using a 1000 on the road with Rascal Flatts, but I think I'm gonna switch it out with a 112. I don't like the high end on the 1000. The digital power amp in those things is a little thin. I've just been too lazy to switch it out. Lol. Can you tell I'm a hard worker?

-t

An example of my Nashville 112 on the last Rascal Flatts record. There's a split fiddle and steel solo about half way through the song.
http://www.travistoyfiles.com/travis/downloads/Backwards.mp3
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Roger Crawford


From:
Griffin, GA USA
Post  Posted 6 May 2007 9:11 am    
Reply with quote

Larry's right, as usual. Ken's mod is amazing. I have, and love, a 112, but we do play some outdoor gigs and the 400 just has more power to punch. One of each is an awesome combination.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jeff Hogsten

 

From:
Flatwoods Ky USA
Post  Posted 7 May 2007 5:56 am    
Reply with quote

do you think two 112's would handle a road situation if they both have a mic on them
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Brown

 

From:
Meridian, Mississippi USA
Post  Posted 7 May 2007 11:10 am     Nashville 112
Reply with quote

When the "112" was first introduced, our recommendation was for this model to be used as a "rehearsal/in bedroom" type of amplifier. But, as always our customers know best as they are in the "real world" weekend situations and by all indications, two will work fine for live roadwork.

Travis Toy performs in the "real world" in major arenas, so I have no doubt that the "112" will work as long as they are mic'd.
View user's profile Send private message
KENNY KRUPNICK

 

From:
Columbus, Ohio
Post  Posted 7 May 2007 5:53 pm    
Reply with quote

2 Nashville 112's are GREAAAAAAT!!!!!! Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jerry Hayes


From:
Virginia Beach, Va.
Post  Posted 8 May 2007 5:53 am    
Reply with quote

I used a NV 400 for about 10 or 12 years until I bought two NV 112's from Bobbe Seymore. I've since just started using one of them as I've found no venue where it wouldn't work. If we're outdoors in a large setting I just plug an XLR mike cord in the back and run it through the PA set and it sounds wondeful. I think this if finally the almost "perfect" steel amp. I've had an offer to trade a NV 1000 straight across for my 112 and refused the deal.......JH in Va.
_________________
Don't matter who's in Austin (or anywhere else) Ralph Mooney is still the king!!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Travis Toy


From:
Nashville, TN, USA
Post  Posted 11 May 2007 8:23 am    
Reply with quote

They don't so well in an arena without a mic. Very Happy
_________________
www.travistoy.com
www.travistoytutorials.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Peewee Charles

 

From:
Waterloo,Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 16 May 2007 9:51 am     Peavey Nashville 112
Reply with quote

I have used Peavey amps from the get go for over 30 years & never had a problem touring worldwide with Gordon Lightfoot....now using 2-112's & they truly are remarkable amps & love the tone....just ordered another from Mike as backup & for studio only....Love these amps & the great service that goes along with them...thanks Mike Brown.....Ed
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ernest Cawby


From:
Lake City, Florida, USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 16 May 2007 6:44 pm     If Weight is not a problem
Reply with quote

If weight is not a problem go wuth Ken's mod, it turns a 400 in to a sound monster, just ask Randy Beavers he loves his, after Ken did his majic on it.

ernie
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John Bechtel


From:
Nashville, Tennessee, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 16 May 2007 7:55 pm    
Reply with quote

Harry; Hi! Since 1982, this latest ‘Pair’ of Peavey Amps. is pair #9, so; I've had many of their models and I must say I like these N–112's (either one or two) as much, if not more than any of the models I've owned! I've owned pairs of: Vintage~Classic-212, Renown-15”, N–400-15”, Vegas-400-15”, Studio 50-12”, Stereo~Chorus-212, Session-400 Limited-15”, N–1000-15” & ‘N–112’! All very good amps. with no problems!
_________________
<marquee> Go~Daddy~Go, (No), Go, It's your Break Time</marquee> L8R, jb
My T-10 Remington Steelmaster
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron