| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic POLL: What's the VERY BEST volume pedal?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  POLL: What's the VERY BEST volume pedal?
Bruce Terry

 

From:
Huntsville, Alabama, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:02 pm    
Reply with quote

Guys:

What's the BEST volume pedal on the market today?

I just bought a vintage EMMONS single neck on a double frame.

I want to get the best sound out of this guitar.

Also, want something that will attach to the pedal bar

Recommendations? Anyone? Anyone?

THX
BRUCE TERRY
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
basilh


From:
United Kingdom
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:03 pm    
Reply with quote

Where's the Poll ?
Irrespective, I go for Hilton.
_________________

Steelies do it without fretting

CLICK THIS to view my tone bars and buy——>
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ben Jones


From:
Seattle, Washington, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:18 pm    
Reply with quote

can i vote NOT goodrich?
the pot in mine lasted about 8 hours of playing time Mad
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lyle Bradford

 

From:
Gilbert WV USA (deceased)
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:19 pm    
Reply with quote

Simply put HILTON!!!!!!!!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Earnest Bovine


From:
Los Angeles CA USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:24 pm    
Reply with quote

I much prefer the sound of a passive pedal over the Hilton. Goodrich is my favorite.
View user's profile Send private message
Herby Wallace


From:
Sevierville, TN, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:33 pm     Volume Pedal
Reply with quote

Without a doubt the Hilton. I would never go back to a pot pedal or a photocell after using the Hilton. My personal pedal is almost 7 years old and works just like a new pedal. I would have probably gone through a dozen or more pots in that time. Also Hilton makes a great bracket that attaches to an Emmons pedal bar. I might mention that I am also a dealer and have pedals and brackets in stock, but I would still be using one even if I didn't sell them.

Herby Wallace
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Allan Thompson

 

From:
Scotland.
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:43 pm    
Reply with quote

Another vote for Hilton
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ron Brennan

 

From:
Orlando, Florida, USA; Formerly, Edison, NJ
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:49 pm     Volume Pedal
Reply with quote

Bruce,

IMHO: HILTON....HILTON....HILTON.....call Herby as soon as you can!! TX
Rgds,

Ron
_________________
JCFSGC member 2005 "Be of Good Cheer"
"55" Fender Stringmaster D8,
"83" Emmons LeGrande 77L SKH D10 8 & 5,
"67" All Original Telecaster & Original Owner
"86" Peavey Factory Modified NV 400,
"60"Fender Concert Amp 4-10"s, RV-3, Upgraded chip set GE-7 EQ, CH1 Chorus, DS-1, Hilton, BJS Bar.
View user's profile Send private message
Chris LeDrew


From:
Canada
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:56 pm    
Reply with quote

I have a Goodrich LDR potless pedal that sounds great! No problems with it at all. Plug in and go. No pesky pots to worry about. And the LDR/Hilton active pedals give your sound a nice push that adds clarity and definition.

The Hilton and the LDR seem to be top of the heap these days, although some players still like to use pot pedals. IMO, they all sound fine.......but the scratchy pot can be an issue if you have to send away for these things and change them yourself.
_________________
Jackson Steel Guitars
Web: www.chrisledrew.com


Last edited by Chris LeDrew on 26 Feb 2007 12:58 pm; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message
John Cox

 

From:
Texas, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 12:57 pm     VP
Reply with quote

As much as I like Goodrich, I'm going to have to say the Emmons volume pedal. It took on a lot of dance floor dust and still lasted almost two decades before I had to replace the pot. J.C.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Terry Wood


From:
Lebanon, MO
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 1:02 pm    
Reply with quote

My good friend and former Principal builds the best Volume pedal ever built!

He has other inventions too and was the first I ever knew to write steel guitar courses. He was marketing them as early as 1976 at the St. Louis Convention. He paid his road dues like the rest of us!

What's his name/His pedal Hilton Pedal to the metal!

GOD bless!

Terry Wood
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bruce Terry

 

From:
Huntsville, Alabama, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 1:11 pm    
Reply with quote

THANKS FOR THE INFO AND OPINIONS GUYS!!!

I guess I'll go with the HILTON. Herby, I'll be in touch shortly.

THX
BRUCE
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Shefrin

 

Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 1:17 pm    
Reply with quote

deleted

Last edited by Mike Shefrin on 21 Jun 2007 10:56 am; edited 1 time in total
Bill Hatcher

 

From:
Atlanta Ga. USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 1:28 pm    
Reply with quote

I have Goodrich and ShoBud pot pedals and the Goodrich LDR and Hilton pedals. The potless pedals will be your future as the great AB pots of yesteryear are no longer availiable and the pots from Canada are only good. I have the Goodrich LDR pedal on a sit down gig for standard guitar and have had not one problem with it.

If you are looking for potless then either the Hilton or the Goodrich LDR.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Daugherty


From:
Rolla, Missouri, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 1:29 pm    
Reply with quote

In my opinion, there should be no such thing as a "best sounding" volume pedal. I do not want a pedal that changes my tone. In my opinion, the pedal should be transparent.
The Hilton gets my vote. It passes everything my guitar gives it. I then have the total frequency range which I can EQ to my liking with my electronics.
Hilton ... It don't get no mo betta.
_________________
www.home.earthlink.net/~johnd37
www.myspace.com/johndaughertysteelguitar
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Terry Wood


From:
Lebanon, MO
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 2:07 pm    
Reply with quote

I'm in agreement with John Daughtery even though he's from Rolla! Wink

Terry
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Terry Wood


From:
Lebanon, MO
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 2:08 pm    
Reply with quote

Oops! Sorry John didn't check my spelling. Again, I think John's right about what a Volume pedal should do.

Terry
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 2:28 pm    
Reply with quote

I use and prefer a Goodrich 120 with a good pot - admittedly, that's getting to be more and more of an issue. I have tried some active pedals, and they work fine, but I still like the Goodrich.

To me, it's more or less equivalent to the difference between passive vs. active or single-coil vs. humbucking pickups. They're all fine, it's just a matter of personal preference and taste. There's no "best", except to somebody in particular. My opinion, of course.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jeremy Threlfall


From:
now in Western Australia
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 2:29 pm    
Reply with quote

Be good if someone would make a potless pedal that mimics the tone thing that pot pedals do.

It just don't sound right without that swell in brightness. Isn't that part of the classic pedal steel sound?

edit: PS - I use a Ernie Ball with a Clarostat EJ pot. Its very well built.


Last edited by Jeremy Threlfall on 26 Feb 2007 2:30 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dick Wood


From:
Springtown Texas, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 2:30 pm    
Reply with quote

HILTON
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mike Wheeler


From:
Delaware, Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 2:37 pm    
Reply with quote

I totally agree with you, Jeremy. The best part of a pot pedal is the slight tonal change. I really like it.

I'll bet Brad Sarno could design an electronic pedal that imitates a pot. I think it's worthwhile.
_________________
Best regards,
Mike
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ron Fitzgerald


From:
Port Charlotte Florida
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 3:45 pm    
Reply with quote

Im still plugging in my Goodrich and its been a wonderful workhorse for a long long time. It would be nice not to do the plug in bit. If it aint broke , I'm not gonna fix it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ben Jones


From:
Seattle, Washington, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 4:01 pm    
Reply with quote

I just cannot understand why they cannot make a durable potentiometer for these things??!! or at least one that lasts more than 8 hours. Evil or Very Mad

why is that so difficult with the current technology available? all the wonderful things and complex devices and sytems and components we are able to build...microchips, artificial hearts, rockets to the moon..and we cannot build a durable potentiometer?

..and yet that doesnt stop the manufacturers from selling you a metal casing with a defective potentiometer and a couple inches of string for $185 Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Greg Cutshaw


From:
Corry, PA, USA
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 4:02 pm    
Reply with quote

Goodrich 120 pot pedal with a Dunlop replacement pot. Totally dead quiet and easily rated to last many years with a carbon impregnated plastic pot. This pot is easily more durable than the ORIGINAL Allen Bradely pot and the orginal pot lasted me 7 years the 1st time and 10 years the second time. High quality. long lasting pots have been make for years and there's no need to avoid the simplicity (no power supply) and low cost of a pot pedal to get a reliable unit.

IF you started with a pot pedal and went with a Hilton or an LDR2, it WOULD be changing your sound and vice versa. Tone is a personal preference and I can't say one is BETTER. They are just different and judging by all the classic recordings in existence, there's been no lack of good tone or highs in pot pedals.

It certainly is possible to build a voltage controlled resistor with no amp, essentially a pedal where the pedal position controls an electronic variable resistor, not an amp with variable gain. Essentially it would look just like a 500K log taper pot to the guitar. It would required a power supply though and I think most people would prefer to have a buffer amp if they are going to spend the extra money.

I love the sound I get out of a pot pedal. You may not and that's fine! I certainly like the lower cost and not having to plug in a power supply cord. Either type of pedal can get the job done.

Greg
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Jim Walker


From:
Headland, AL
Post  Posted 26 Feb 2007 4:04 pm    
Reply with quote

Goodrich LDR..........
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron