Marlin Smoot
From:
Kansas
|
Posted 16 Apr 2007 1:37 pm |
|
Judges Uphold Increased Internet Radio Royalty Rates
Victory
None of the moving parties have made a sufficient showing of new evidence or clear error or manifest injustice that would warrant rehearing. To the contrary ... most of the parties' arguments in support of a rehearing or reconsideration merely restat
The COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD (CRB) today upheld its earlier decision on fair royalty rates to be paid to musical artists and record labels for the use of their work on Internet radio. The three-judge panel denied motions by Internet radio operators for a rehearing of the board's MARCH 1 decision setting performance royalty rates for Internet radio from 2006 to 2010.
The CRB wrote in its decision, "None of the moving parties have made a sufficient showing of new evidence or clear error or manifest injustice that would warrant rehearing. To the contrary ... most of the parties' arguments in support of a rehearing or reconsideration merely restate arguments that were made or evidence that was presented during the proceeding."
SOUNDEXCHANGE Exec. Director JOHN SIMSON declared that this is a victory for performing artists and record labels who work long and hard to produce music for all to enjoy. "Our artists and labels look forward to working with the Internet radio industry -- large and small, commercial and non-commercial -- so that together we can ensure it succeeds as a place where great music is available to music lovers of all genres," he said.
"AFTRA recording artists applaud the Copyright Royalty Board for upholding their decision on Internet radio," said AFTRA National Exec. Director KIM ROBERTS HEDGPETH. "They deserve to be paid fairly for the use of the creativity, talent, and hard work they put into making music. Internet radio is growing and successful because fans want to listen to the music created by artists. The CRB's decision recognizes that, as these businesses grow, both featured and non-featured artists should be compensated at fair market rates for their contributions to the growth of these companies."
The CRB also wrote, "It appears that all evidence discussed in the motions had either been discovered during the proceeding or could have been discovered during the proceeding, with reasonable diligence." Additionally, the CRB found, "In the absence of an adequate showing of new evidence, the parties' arguments in their respective motions amount to nothing more than a rehash of the arguments that the Judges considered in the Initial Determination."
Additionally, the CRB denied the request of webcasters to stay implementation of the new royalty rates (2006-2010) until all legal appeals had been exhausted. In doing so, the CRB pointed to specific language established by Congress in the Copyright Act. The CRB wrote, "Congress, not the Judges, determined the effective dates for the royalty rates." The CRB went on, "Moreover, Congress determined that these rates would go into effect, notwithstanding any pending motions for rehearing."
The CRB also made two points of clarification regarding its initial decision. First, at the request of the webcasters, the CRB will allow them to use estimated ATH (Aggregate Tuning Hours) measures to determine audience listening for 2006 and 2007. However, the CRB said this is only for a transitional period, during which webcasters who have not yet implemented systems to track the music that they play will have the chance to do so.
Also, in response to SOUNDEXCHANGE's request for clarification regarding whether the initial decision covers webcasting services delivered over cellular networks, the CRB indicated it did. |
|
