| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Any tone difference between mica or wood?
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Any tone difference between mica or wood?
Albert Svenddal


From:
Minneapolis, MN
Post  Posted 20 Jan 2007 8:41 pm    
Reply with quote

I am just curious as to know if there is any tone difference between a wood body guitar and a mica finish. It seems to me that the wood finished guitars might have a more mellow sound to them than a mica finish. Also, would there be any sustain difference? Thanks for any input. Albert
_________________
Williams D-12 9x7, Emmons PP D-10, 8X5, Quilter SteeAire amp.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jim Bob Sedgwick

 

From:
Clinton, Missouri USA
Post  Posted 20 Jan 2007 9:07 pm    
Reply with quote

Albert, How are you doing? I have owned both lacquer and mica finished guitars. My preference is for the lacquer. To my ears, there is a small, nasally sounding ping with the mica that I don't care for. Some other opinions will differ, I'm sure. My Lacquer Williams will peel paint off the walls if you are worried about having enough highs. ( The metal necks are brighter than a wood neck ), but are also stronger. I can tweak mine to about any tone a person would want. Hope this helps you somewhat. ( The advantage that mica has over the wood is what I call dink defense. Mica is hard to dink (dent). If you dink a lacquer, it will probably be with the guitar until its demise. (Gives it CHARACTER Laughing
View user's profile Send private message
Billy Carr

 

From:
Seminary, Mississippi, USA (deceased)
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 3:10 am     wood vs mica
Reply with quote

Opinions on this vary greatly from what I've read in the past. It's my belief that there's several different factors that figure into it. A good changer that's mounted properly, along with factors like the way the body is put together, a good pick up and of course, a good set of hands along with good wood can make a great sounding lacquer or mica guitar. Personally, I prefer a mica body because of the durable mica. I've had both. The only material I hadn't had a chance to try is the carbon fiber that MSA uses. (I believe the carbon fiber body is correct here) Also, to me, each guitar is a little different, even from two that are just alike.
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Kelchen

 

From:
Cedar Rapids, Iowa USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 3:55 am     Mica vs. Wood
Reply with quote

Albert, Contact Dennis Detweiler. He has first hand experience with this re: his Zum U-12 and his MSA U-12. He would gladly share his findings.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Delvin Morgan


From:
Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 5:10 am    
Reply with quote

Albert,
How are you doing? My Williams 12 string ( the one you did so well on at Duluth) is is maple with maple neck, and least you can sure make it sound great. I also have a mica Emmons, and the Willy sounds mellower.
You can't beat maple and laquer.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Charlie McDonald


From:
out of the blue
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 8:14 am    
Reply with quote

My limited experience with a mica MSA and a lacquer one was that the solid maple one has the better tone.
The only other non-expert in the house is my wife, and she noticed the difference instantly.
_________________
Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 8:56 am    
Reply with quote

are the MICA Guitars not Solid Maple ?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Art Beard

 

From:
Once upon a time out west (deceased)
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 9:29 am    
Reply with quote

how much difference is there between a metal neck on wood body and a wood neck?? New to steels and looking for my first. thanks Art
View user's profile Send private message
Jim Bob Sedgwick

 

From:
Clinton, Missouri USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 11:07 am    
Reply with quote

JMO... The metal neck is slightly brighter than a wood neck. But, how you set your amp also has a great bearing on the overall tone. Both sound great to me.
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Douchette


From:
Gallatin, TN (deceased)
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 11:13 am    
Reply with quote

Nah.. there's no difference in sound in an Emmons and a Sho-Bud... zero...

Shocked
_________________
Mikey D... H.S.P.
Music hath the charm to soothe a savage beast, but I'd try a 10mm first.

http://www.steelharp.com
http://www.thesessionplayers.com/douchette.html

(other things you can ask about here)
http://s117.photobucket.com/albums/o54/Steelharp/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jay Ganz


From:
Out Behind The Barn
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 11:15 am    
Reply with quote

I'm not sure if you're looking to buy one or the other, but the
lacquer ones are quite a bit more expensive. Wood necks adds
even more bucks. Rolling Eyes
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jim Sliff


From:
Lawndale California, USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 11:43 am    
Reply with quote

Quote:
are the MICA Guitars not Solid Maple ?


I don't know about other makers, but my GFI is both - a composite wood plank at the top covered in formica, and metal frame also covered in formica. But I believe my old MSA Classic was all metal and formica, although others use wood with formica.

In other words, I'm pretty sure there are all different combinations.
_________________
No chops, but great tone
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jon Light


From:
Saugerties, NY
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 11:58 am    
Reply with quote

This is really not an answerable question unless you compare identical guitars made around the same time from the same lumber, differing only in the mica vs. lacquer body. With so many variables that contribute to the sonic signature of any steel guitar, for me to compare my lacquer Carter to my mica Fessenden and conclude that lacquer guitars sound like this, mica guitars sound like that would be none too swift. And I would hesitate to attribute all differences in sound between my Carter and a mica Carter to the finish, considering all the other elements involved. This is not to say that I don't think there is a difference. I expect there is. Just hard to generalize or quantify.

And btw, mica Carters have maple bodies as does my Fess, and, I believe, my p/p, the only guitars I'm qualified to comment on.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ronnie Green

 

From:
Des Moines, New Mexico, USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 11:59 am    
Reply with quote

Art. If you play outside alot, you have to remember temperature. Metal moves, thus you will have tuning nightmares if you don't have experience in this situation.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rick Kornacker


From:
Dixon Springs, Tennessee, USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 12:16 pm     lacquer vs. mica
Reply with quote

Hey Albert!
a little more input...your comment that a lacquer guitar being more "mellow" than mica is a notion that is probably true about Sho-Bud guitars...might even go so far as saying that this idea was perpetuated by Lloyd's(Green) undeniable mellow tone.(Compare his "Bud" tone to that of the JCH tone on the "Reflections" album. And, since there were virtually no mica "Sho-Buds" a comparison is not readily available. My current guitar is a Williams lacquer finish guitar with a metal neck...when I ordered it from Bill I was expecting it to strongly resemble a "Bud" in it's tonal characteristics, but I really didn't have my heart set on that sound.Turns out to sound as much like a mica guitar as the real thing...bright, clear, great separation, and great sustain. Bill told me that a wood neck would mellow it a bit. Honestly, I bought the guitar as much for cosmetic reasons as any, wanting that nostalgic "look".I got more in this one package than all of my previous guitars put together! For general purposes it would probably be best to consider a particular make of steel..then compare it's wood and mica counterpart. Regards, RK
_________________
"think MORE...play LESS"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stu Schulman


From:
Ulster Park New Yawk (deceased)
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 12:19 pm    
Reply with quote

I agree with that kid from Brooklyn.
_________________
Steeltronics Z-pickup,Desert Rose S-10 4+5,Desert Rose Keyless S-10 3+5... Mullen G2 S-10 3+5,Telonics 206 pickups,Telonics volume pedal.,Blanton SD -10,Emmons GS_10...Zirctone bar,Bill Groner Bar...any amp that isn't broken.Steel Seat.Com seats...Licking paint chips off of Chinese Toys since 1952.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Art Beard

 

From:
Once upon a time out west (deceased)
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 12:47 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks for the info. Art
View user's profile Send private message
Bob Hoffnar


From:
Austin, Tx
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 1:46 pm    
Reply with quote

When I have compared two Franklin's (one mica, one wood, both metal necks, same pickups, same amp) they do have a slightly different sound. The mica was a bit more focused and solid sounding than the wood. The wood had a bit more of that warm, sweet Franklin signature sound. For my purposes I prefered the mica.

If you are talking to a builder about wood or mica I would trust there experience and suggestions about the differences in sound in there particular steels.
_________________
Bob
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Tommy Young

 

From:
Ethelsville Alabama
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2007 4:27 pm    
Reply with quote

i do work on a good many steels and for the most part the lacquer or wood guitars have a much sweeter tone but as most plp know they are much easier to ding and scratch-up than formica so the choice is yours tommy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Gordon Sharp

 

From:
Kingston, Tennessee
Post  Posted 22 Jan 2007 1:40 pm     Tone difference between mica and wood
Reply with quote

Albert after hearing and playing with you at Greenville last spring,I do not think it would matter what the guitar was made of.You would make it sound great.Thats a fact: Gordon Sharp Kingston Tenn.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Albert Svenddal


From:
Minneapolis, MN
Post  Posted 23 Jan 2007 10:59 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks for all the comments. I agreee that that wood guitars will not be as durable as a mica finish, and that the neck choice (aluminum or wood) will make a difference in tone. I grew up with Lloyd as my hero and loved his tone. It's mostly in the hands. I hope to see everyone at the next Jam in Greenville. Blessings, Albert
_________________
Williams D-12 9x7, Emmons PP D-10, 8X5, Quilter SteeAire amp.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron