| Author |
Topic: Is It True About String Changing |
Greg Sullivan
From:
Poughqaug New York
|
Posted 30 Oct 2005 11:10 am |
|
Since I am not a steel player per say, I am
a trombonist and trumpet player. I have a question.
Many players change strings often, others I have heard dont. their reason is that the sound is mellow and sweeter than trying to break in a new set prior to playing. New strings have that metallic tone which is undertstandable. My strings on my Dual Pro are over 3 years old and still have that bite and sweet tone, can anyone give me the pro or con's on this. I am aware that on pedal steel where the strings are constantly being stretched it is necessary and that may be best to change strings often, but on a non pedal guitar is this necessary. I understand that the great Tom Morell seldom changes his strings. Can anyone offer a suggestion? I am aware that certain chemicals from the body and excessive perspiring cause strings to deteriate. Any commets are welcome and will be appreciated.
Greg Sullivan[This message was edited by Greg Sullivan on 30 October 2005 at 11:19 AM.] |
|
|
 |
John Dahms
From:
Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted 30 Oct 2005 11:28 am
|
|
| I can see both sides of this debate. There is one absolute, that eventually the wear or corrosion on a string will effect its ability to produce an "in tune" vibration and it becomes useless on an instrument. Having said that, there is a valid argument for those who prefer the sound of broken in strings. I let the instrument tell me. I have some guitars that without a doubt sound their best with fresh strings. Then again I have some that I cringe when I have to get past the new string break in period. Your playing style, expectation of the tone and preference for type of string of course play some roll in this, I'm sure. In music and art there is no right or wrong, just what is right or wrong for you. |
|
|
|
Greg Sullivan
From:
Poughqaug New York
|
Posted 30 Oct 2005 11:31 am
|
|
Thank you
Much appreciated |
|
|
|
AJ Azure
From:
Massachusetts, USA * R.I.P.
|
|
|
|
Gene Jones
From:
Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
|
Posted 30 Oct 2005 2:27 pm
|
|
| * [This message was edited by Gene Jones on 13 November 2005 at 11:51 AM.] |
|
|
|
Joey Ace
From:
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted 30 Oct 2005 5:45 pm
|
|
It's also relative to your body chemistry.
Some people kill strings fast by their hand oils.
Others don't. |
|
|
|
David Doggett
From:
Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
|
Posted 30 Oct 2005 8:50 pm
|
|
| I think everyone agrees that acoustic guitars sound better with new strings. With electric guitars it not as important. Some people don't care for the brassy sound of fresh strings on an electric. But there is a limit to how long strings will sound good and play in tune. After a month or two, they begin to get a little dull and erratic. Some of the new polymer coated strings sound pretty good a very long time, even on acoustics; but I haven't tried them on steel. |
|
|
|
Michael Whitley
From:
Oxford, Mississippi, USA
|
Posted 31 Oct 2005 5:46 pm
|
|
| What Joey said. We have a guitarist who sits in sometimes. When he does, every guitar he touches needs re-stringing the next day. Me, I don't give off whatever he does, and I don't play paying gigs much, so I don't change strings much. I am more guided by a string's smoothness than its lack of crispness - I don't dislike the mellow tone, but I do mind the feel of old, rusty strings. Takes the fun out. |
|
|
|
Jody Carver
From:
KNIGHT OF FENDER TWEED
|
Posted 31 Oct 2005 9:14 pm
|
|
Hey Guys
This is what I have done for years. I change a set of strings and the tune the string about 1/2 tone high than 440 and let it sit for a day or two while I play it. then I bring it down to 440 and vice versa, It works for me because the tensions helps keep the strings in tune and you dont have that metallic sound which I dont like.
My quad has strings on it that are orginals from 57 and it still sounds and plays great
I play it about 2 hours for about two days a week. Try it it really works |
|
|
|
Dan Sawyer
From:
Studio City, California, USA
|
Posted 1 Nov 2005 8:39 am
|
|
| I change the unwound strings much more often than the wound ones. |
|
|
|
Rick Garrett
From:
Tyler, Texas
|
Posted 1 Nov 2005 9:16 am
|
|
I let the strings tell me when its time to change. When they get difficult to tune its time. I also wipe my guitar and strings down after I play it every time even if I only played a few minutes.
Rick |
|
|
|
John Bechtel
From:
Nashville, Tennessee, R.I.P.
|
Posted 4 Nov 2005 10:43 pm
|
|
It's kinda easy to tell when it's getting close to string~changing time on a PSG, because; the Nylon~Tuner adjustments begin to need more tweaking than usual! On the non-pedal steel they'll last for a long, long time, however; it always seems so refreshing to me, to replace all the strings within about (2)± months! (I personally prefer the brighter new sound!) Old dull strings sound like cardboard to me especially on the lower wound strings!
------------------
“Big John” Bechtel
’04 SD–10 Black Derby w/3 & 5 & Pad
’65 Re-Issue Fender Twin–Reverb Custom™ 15” Eminence
web site
|
|
|
|
