Author |
Topic: E9 2nd String "D" Tuning |
Jon Light (deceased)
From: Saugerties, NY
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 11:26 am
|
|
What are some of the compromises (or non-compromises) folks have tried for the D? Although I tune my 2nd string open to D, the question applies, whether it's an open D or on a lower.
Against a B-pedaled 3rd string A I have a real ugly 4th interval if I want to have a usable open dom7th. Plus the thirds w/ string 1 and/or 5 get squirrely. I've gotten by with a very sharp D up until now but I'm obsessing over the best compromises on a slow Sunday. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Bobby Lee
From: Cloverdale, California, USA
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 11:55 am
|
|
Consider the positions in the chord scale, and what you need to get a scale tone from the 2nd string in those positions. Here it is in E:
fret 2nd_string
0 D#
2 D
3 D#
5 D#
7 D
8 D#
10 D# I played with the 2nd string tuned to D for 20 years. I switched after doing this analysis, and I'm glad I did. It makes it easier to play most positions.
If you lower your G#'s to G, you might use frets 4 and 9 which would require the D instead of D#. That skews the equation, especially if you don't use your F lever very much (frets 3, 8 and 10).
As for fine tuning, I match the D to the A. I tune the D# 10 cents flat of the B.
------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog
[This message was edited by Bobby Lee on 29 October 2006 at 12:00 PM.] |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Jon Light (deceased)
From: Saugerties, NY
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 12:13 pm
|
|
Yeah, Bobby---I've noted your studies on the D vs. D# 2nd string. But I've opted to keep the D. It's the intonation thing that's bugging me. I think my #1 priority is a nice third with the 1st string F#. Today I added an an A pedal compensator on the 1st string to match the one I've got on the 7th and this has really complicated matters re: the relationship between strings 1 & 2 and the different intonations w/ A pedal down or not. In fact, I think the compensator on 1 has to go.
This whole area of thinking (altered ET with the various intervalic compromises in different inversions & scale positions) is just not one of my mental strengths and it's tying my brain up in knots. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Earnest Bovine
From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 12:20 pm
|
|
Do you have the same problems tuning your other D string?
Meantone tuning works for me, to get all those intervals sounding good. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Twayn Williams
From: Portland, OR
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 12:26 pm
|
|
Quote: |
Against a B-pedaled 3rd string A I have a real ugly 4th interval if I want to have a usable open dom7th. |
I recommend giving precedence to 4ths and 5ths being pure and let the thirds fall where they may, at least in ensemble situations. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Bobby Lee
From: Cloverdale, California, USA
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 12:35 pm
|
|
I tune like this:
1 F# 0
2 D# -5 D +5
3 G# -5 A +5
4 E +5 F# -5
5 B +5 C# -5 [This message was edited by Bobby Lee on 29 October 2006 at 12:39 PM.] |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Jon Light (deceased)
From: Saugerties, NY
|
Posted 29 Oct 2006 12:38 pm
|
|
I'm trying to analyze this and what I'm finding is that it's about how I use this. The low D on my modified U-12 is on the 8th string lower. I tend to use this primarily as a Dom7 and I can get away with the sharp D for the most part. The high D gets used a lot more in ringing harmonized thirds. This actually makes the thirds more critical, for me, than the fourth. I think. I've got to keep working this out. It's interesting to me to discover that the answer may well not be a universal one but, rather, "how do you use it". Even if that means that there are objective limitations to the solution.
I have to admit that even though I am familiar with the term "mean temperment", I just don't know what it means. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Twayn Williams
From: Portland, OR
|
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Tony Prior
From: Charlotte NC
|
Posted 30 Oct 2006 6:30 am
|
|
so if you detune the D# and bring it to the natural D..
may I ask?
the conventional tuning gives us a Raise to E, and a double lower, D and C#. 4 notes on the 2nd string...4 very NICE notes...
those that are using the natural D on the 2nd string..
how are you getting the E..and the D# and the C# ?
curious minds want to know...
|
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Jon Light (deceased)
From: Saugerties, NY
|
Posted 30 Oct 2006 12:44 pm
|
|
Tony--I raise the D to D# on RKR#1 (and also on the F lever), I lower the D to C# on RKL (the E lower lever) (and also on LKR#2, my 8th string E>D lever which is essentially the B6 P6 on my E9/B6. And for the first time, on this new guitar (Fess), something I never had on the Carter but I think I'll put it on soon, I raise the D to E with the 1st string F#>G# raise and the 6th string G#>F# lower on LKR#1. This all works really well. That move with string 1 & 2 together is a new one for me. I can raise them and bring them down with string 2 coming to D# or D, depending on my use of the RKR.
The guitar is 8 + 8. The coped isn't flawless but I've developed it over the last 7 years and it works for me pretty ok.
Anyway, there's the answer to your q, I think.
Hey Twayn--thanks for the link. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |