| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Excel vs. Emmons string spacing
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Excel vs. Emmons string spacing
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 7:58 am    
Reply with quote

Jerry Jones wrote:
While tapered string width may well be a holdover from Spanish guitar, an equal string spacing would require wider decking to accommodate 10th key to 1st key spacing as well as preventing D10 key interference.

Yep, it would require a wider deck, which would definitely be my preference anyway, especially on an S10 or S12. I'm too tall to deal with a narrow single-neck guitar. Of course, this issue could be rendered moot with a keyless design.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lynn Kasdorf


From:
Waterford Virginia, USA
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 7:59 am    
Reply with quote

I measured a few lap steels and pedal steel I have and they all taper towards the nut. I truly do not understand why this became a standard thing to do as steel guitars developed.

Maybe it was just one of those things like "this is hw it has always been done". But there must be more to it.

I wonder if there has ever been a lap or pedal steel that had the same spacing at the nut as the bridge?

My best guess is this: it is easier to pick individual strings when they are a bit farther apart, so wider at the bridge is good. But this extra width at the other end would require a bit more vertical bar movement or longer bar. The ergonomics of this are pretty fascinating.
_________________
"You call that thing a guitar?"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ian Rae


From:
Redditch, England
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 8:37 am    
Reply with quote

Somebody at some point must have built a pedal steel with parallel spacing if only out of curiosity.
It clearly didn't catch on or we'd all be playing them.
But we still lack a theoretical explanation.
Anyone else care to try? Smile
_________________
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pete McAvity

 

From:
St. Louis, Missouri USA
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 8:48 am    
Reply with quote

My main guitar is a Superb D10. I sat at one of Steve Hitsman’s Legrandes recently and it felt like playing gut string flamenco after being accustomed to a tele. Doesn’t look much different to the naked eye, but the differences can account for a lot of clonks until your brain, eyes & hands adjust.
_________________
Excel Superb D10, Sarno Black Box or Freeloader, Goodrich L120, Boss DD5, Baby Bloomer, 1965 Super Reverb chopped to a head, feeding a mystery PA cab w/ a K130.

They say "thats how it goes". I say "that ain't the way it stays!"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tucker Jackson

 

From:
Portland, Oregon, USA
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 8:55 am    
Reply with quote

Ian Rae wrote:
But we still lack a theoretical explanation.

Speculation: It's about the keyhead. If the string spacing was as wide at the nut as it is at the bridge, the 1st and 10th strings would have to cut over at a really strong angle on the way to the tuning post in the keyhead. Hysteresis City.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lynn Kasdorf


From:
Waterford Virginia, USA
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 9:31 am    
Reply with quote

Tucker Jackson wrote:
Ian Rae wrote:
But we still lack a theoretical explanation.

Speculation: It's about the keyhead. If the string spacing was as wide at the nut as it is at the bridge, the 1st and 10th strings would have to cut over at a really strong angle on the way to the tuning post in the keyhead. Hysteresis City.


True- with traditional keyhead design. But not with a keyless.
_________________
"You call that thing a guitar?"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 9:43 am    
Reply with quote

Tucker Jackson wrote:
Ian Rae wrote:
But we still lack a theoretical explanation.

Speculation: It's about the keyhead. If the string spacing was as wide at the nut as it is at the bridge, the 1st and 10th strings would have to cut over at a really strong angle on the way to the tuning post in the keyhead. Hysteresis City.

Not sure I see that. On a properly designed keyhead, the tuning key post will move over commensurately with the roller nut position. But with any keyhead, I always have to put enough winds on the post to bring the string takeoff point reasonably in line with the nut roller. That is required regardless of the width of the nut, keyhead, or anything else.

Example - my Zum U12. I could clearly use an extra wind or two on the bottom strings, I was probably in a rush. And string 5 was just a real sloppy fast change after a string broke right before we started playing last week - it's time for new strings! But it is possible to line them up by simply putting the right number of windings on the post. It's a good idea to put several windings on anyway, from a string breakage point of view. Definitely don't want the string to break off close to the tuning post hole.



And definitely - this is all moot with a keyless design.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Steve Knight

 

From:
NC
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 10:58 am    
Reply with quote

It would be nice to have a little more room between the tuning pegs on strings 5 & 6.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
b0b


From:
Cloverdale, CA, USA
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 11:09 am    
Reply with quote

My first Williams, a D-10, had a traditional keyhead and the string spacing was too narrow for my liking. I requested 11/32" spacing on my 2nd Williams, a D-12, and Bill Rudolph said no problem as long as it's keyless. He built it that way and I was quite happy with it.
_________________
-𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chris Templeton


From:
The Green Mountain State
Post  Posted 26 Aug 2021 12:50 pm    
Reply with quote

Buddy had been playing keyless Sierras and probably had three or four, but his last Sierra, he had it with keys because he said that is what people were used to seeing.
I'm guessing the need for three hands when changing a string might have had something to do with it too.
I'm not sure if he had Danny Shields pickups in the Sierras, but he loved the sound of the C6th neck.
_________________
Excel 3/4 Pedal With An 8 String Hawaiian Neck, Sierra Tapper (10 string with a raised fretboard to fret with fingers), Single neck Fessenden 3/5
"The Tapper" : https://christophertempleton.bandcamp.com/album/the-tapper
Soundcloud Playlist: https://soundcloud.com/bluespruce8:
View user's profile Send private message

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron