Author |
Topic: Universal E9/B6 2nd string half stop |
William Carter
From: Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA
|
Posted 15 Feb 2021 5:25 pm
|
|
When I ordered my U12, I researched a lot of different setups before finalizing the copedent. Now that I realize the struggle of lowering E's on a lever with 3 pulls, I am questioning why most of the copedents I looked at had the 2nd string whole-step lower on the same lever with the E-lowers. That makes 3 return springs I'm having to fight to play the D-lever.
Would there be any disadvantage to moving that whole step lower on the 2nd string to the same lever with the 1/2 step 2nd string lower (half stop mechanism) like what it is on my E9 guitar?
I do not know enough about the C6 side yet to understand if there was some reason universals put the E lowers with the 2nd string whole step lower. Is that the reason? _________________ _________________
ZumSteel D10, Mullen G2 SD12 Universal, Rittenberry SD10 |
|
|
|
Larry Bressington
From: Nebraska
|
Posted 15 Feb 2021 5:31 pm
|
|
Most standard is 1/2 then whole on one lever, however many people dislike half stops, so they lower the 2nd string to C# on the E's lower lever especially if you have 4 levers. I use this feature and my knee is not very tight, i'm like you i don't like a hard working loaded lever.
If your lever is stiff, there maybe adjustments you can make to the pulls for a lighter feel, but that lenghtens the pull's, however that's hard to explain over the web and it can turn into a can of worms fast, a visit to a good steel man could look at it. _________________ A.K.A Chappy. |
|
|
|
Bobby D. Jones
From: West Virginia, USA
|
Posted 15 Feb 2021 6:08 pm
|
|
Lowering the 2nd string to C# with 4&8 to D# is a standard move on Jeff Newman's Universal Tuning.
He also lowers 2nd string to C# with the 9th string back D on LKL.
By moving the Pull Rods closer to cross rod a hole or 2 on the bell crank, Will take less pressure but at the cost of a little longer lever move. |
|
|
|
Dennis Montgomery
From: Western Washington
|
|
|
|
Dave Mudgett
From: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
|
Posted 15 Feb 2021 7:18 pm
|
|
Why a new thread? You already started one on this topic here - https://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=366870
An important consideration in separating the string 2 D#=>D=>C# lever (that is frequently on standard E9 guitars) into two separate levers is that on the std E9 setup, the half-stop to D is frequently fixed by timing the string 9 D=>C# lower so that it starts exactly when the string 2 lower hits D, creating a feel stop. On E9/B6 universal, the most typical change to get the equivalent of that string 9 is to raise string 9 from B to D, which is a long change that generally needs to start early. So in that case, it is more difficult to get that feel stop. With that setup, the string 9 D to C# lower is obtained with the A-pedal down and releasing the B=>D raise.
So on universal, it is pretty common to separate the D#=>D and D#=>C# lowers to different levers. At that point, the question becomes, "What is the lever that will tolerate that extra lower with the least problems?". I definitely would not put it on the E=>F raise because it interferes with many uses for that lever. Similarly with the B=>Bb lower, if present. Other typical levers frequently have string 1 F#=>G#, string 2 D#=>E and either string 6 G#=>F# or string 7 F#=>G#, so that's out. This leaves the E=>Eb lower, unless you have an extra lever, which would typically mean >5 levers. Great if ya' got 'em, but there are also other competing uses for them if ya' do.
The other thing is that, looking at this from the B6 perspective on the universal E9/B6 tuning, the D#=>C# gives the equivalent of the D note on C6. So that makes it even more logical to put D#=>C# the E=>Eb lower, since that C# (9th tone) note is now available whenever operating in the so-called "B6 mode". I imagine a lot of dominantly E9 players don't think about it like this, but it's true.
So now the question is how to make this slightly porked-out E-lever easier to use. As Bobby says, one answer is to change the leverages around to accept a slightly longer pull in exchange for less torque required to activate that lever. But I'll say that my Zums handle this extra pull with zero problem at all, stock as they come from Bruce. My primary Zum U12 is totally stock and I can't tell any difference from a standard E=>Eb lever. I have a Mullen G2, but it's an SD-10 with the standard half-stop on string 2 and doesn't have that change on the E=>Eb lever. But I don't think I would have any difficulty adding that lower - the tension on the E=>Eb lever is not heavy at all with just the E lowers. Again, if it's an issue, change the leverages around to require less torque.
But yet another solution is to use a plunger type half-stop lower on string 2 to create a strong half-stop without necessarily timing it with the string 9 raise. My Franklin has one, and I think a number of builders use these. And Mullen sells one too - https://mullenguitars.com/shop/ols/products/half-stop-mechanism - as well as WBS guitars in Germany - https://wbssteelguitars.com/index.php?page=realstop. |
|
|
|
Dennis Detweiler
From: Solon, Iowa, US
|
Posted 15 Feb 2021 9:02 pm
|
|
There are too many uses for the 2nd string moving independently from the Eb lever when playing E9th and B6th. It's defeating itself when moving D# to C# with the Eb lever.
Why not tune it open to C# (Hal Rugg) and raise it to D/C# with the same lever that raises string nine B to D? If Mullen makes a good half stop, it would be a worthwhile purchase. Then you'll have only two pulls on each of those levers. _________________ 1976 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics 427 pickup, 1975 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics X-12 pickup, Revelation preamp, Carbon Copy Delay and Hall Of Fame Reverb, Crown XLS 1002, 2- 15" Eminence Wheelhouse speakers, ShoBud Pedal, Effects Pedals. 1949 Epiphone D-8. |
|
|
|
William Carter
From: Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA
|
Posted 16 Feb 2021 5:38 am
|
|
Dave Mudgett wrote: |
Zums handle this extra pull with zero problem at all, stock as they come from Bruce. |
I would love to know what the stock setup on a Zum looks like. On the Mullen, string 2 is in bell crank hole 5 (outermost), string 4 hole 5, and string 8 hole 4. I don't know how many holes a Zum has, or what the arrangement on the E-lower lever is, but I want to compare it to what I have. _________________ _________________
ZumSteel D10, Mullen G2 SD12 Universal, Rittenberry SD10 |
|
|
|
Dave Mudgett
From: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
|
Posted 16 Feb 2021 11:10 am
|
|
Quote: |
On the Mullen, string 2 is in bell crank hole 5 (outermost), string 4 hole 5, and string 8 hole 4. I don't know how many holes a Zum has, or what the arrangement on the E-lower lever is, but I want to compare it to what I have. |
Understand that the mechanics of the Zum vs. Mullen may be somewhat different. A number of things affect the mechanical leverages and torque required to execute a change, including B/C position, changer hole, changer design, return springs, the position of your knee on the lever relative to the pull rod, and so on. I haven't studied the differences in my Zums vs. my G2 in detail.
With that said, on the ZumSteel I mentioned above, the E=>Eb lever (which I call the E-lever) bellcranks have 6 slots. Numbering the B/C slots the same as yours, 1 being closest to the changer, and also adding the changer hole, I have:
Code: |
String B/C Slot Changer Hole
8 3 Top
4 5 Middle
2 6 Top |
So your Mullen B/C slot choices are in a similar proportion to each other as those on my Zum.
Note that you shouldn't expect the torque required for your E=>Eb lever to be as light as, let's say, your E=>F lever with just two half-tone pulls on it. My E-lever is definitely heavier than my F-lever. But it is very manageable. The guitar has a lock which I almost never use. I suppose if I was going to use the guitar for a whole night or a whole set in B6, it might come in handy. But that would be very rare.
The lever that is a bit heavy on my Mullen is the RKR D-lever, which has not only the regular string 2 D#=>D=>C# and string 9 D=>C#, but also a string 7 F#=>G (or sometimes G# if I feel like it) raise. One of these days I'm going to get in there and see if I can lighten it up a bit. But I don't want to go crazy - that extra string 7 raise is set so it helps firm up the string 2 half-stop.
One other thing, may not be an issue, but is it possible that your lower return springs are cranked too tight on those strings? They should definitely be tight enough to firmly return the strings to pitch when disengaging the lower, but not more than that.
Finally - have you talked to the folks at Mullen? I'm fairly confident they could help you out on this.
Quote: |
There are too many uses for the 2nd string moving independently from the Eb lever when playing E9th and B6th. It's defeating itself when moving D# to C# with the Eb lever. |
I deal with that by sometimes disengaging/re-engaging the string 2 lower. It takes about 10 seconds in either direction, it's not real tight. But there are times I really like having that lower there. If it ain't there, I definitely can't use it. |
|
|
|
William Carter
From: Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA
|
Posted 16 Feb 2021 11:43 am
|
|
I did talk to Mike at Mullen. He said changing the bell crank holes or the return springs either one is an option. I just need to pick out the best option, and I'm a little gun shy about return springs after what I had read on the forum. However, it is very possible that they set it up from the factory with the return springs in overkill mode just to eliminate the possibility of tuning issues. I'll have to research a little more before I am comfortable adjusting those after hearing too many people say not to touch them. _________________ _________________
ZumSteel D10, Mullen G2 SD12 Universal, Rittenberry SD10 |
|
|
|
Larry Bressington
From: Nebraska
|
Posted 16 Feb 2021 5:49 pm
|
|
Will, on the return springs...
* work one string at a time!!! E's lower strings 8,4,2
1)Unscrew the return spring adjusting screw maybe a half turn and then activate lever.
2)continue adjusting anti-clockwise and then activating lever until the string no longer returns to proper pitch, meaning it returns flat.
3)Then tighten clockwise one full turn.
That will get you very close and have the most relaxed tension on the return side of things, just make sure when you slowly activate the lever the string returns back to pitch, if it don't then tighten another half turn or so.... then you can go for the rod pulls, that's where pre taking photo's are best for reference and can get testy quick. _________________ A.K.A Chappy. |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 28 Jul 2021 11:37 pm
|
|
I have recently obtained my new (used) steel and changed around the assignments of the levers.
I come from a U-12, although I never got on with the B6 side of things, so my new steel is an extended E9th with the 9th string raised to a D with the D lever.
I have intuitively set up the D lever to drop string #2 to D resp. C# as I was used to, but since I am (yet) playing arrangements that come from a very basic (E9) setup with E,F,D levers, I have not yet run into a situation where I would have needed the C# on top.
I now dawns on me that this might have come from the C6 side of things (as Dave stated above), in which case the C# change makes more sense on the E lever (E to Eb), or remove it entirely.
I fail to see the purpose of a repeated c# there(the A pedal has one there anyways).
I would like to hear from your expertise on those changes, folks.
If the C# is of more use on the B6 side, then it is clearly on the wrong lever, since on many universals those changes are on opposing sides of the right knee.
I have devised a subjectively better method of a feel stop (which I may write about shortly...), that is less burdening, but if you want a well defined "sensation" that indicates your half stop position it ought to be pronounced, or it will be useless.
This lever is already pretty stiff since there was no way around using "stiffer" bell crank and lever hole assignments in order to achieve the displacement needed for the B to D change on string #9.
So it does introduce some friction which gets up my nose. I need this lever very often, so if the C# is relatively useless I remove it alongside with the half stop contraption.
Thanks,
Helmut _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Ian Rae
From: Redditch, England
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 5:08 am
|
|
I play B6/E9 universal. I tune the 2nd string to C# and raise it to D and D# on the same lever that raises 9 to D. _________________ Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs |
|
|
|
Dennis Detweiler
From: Solon, Iowa, US
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 5:53 am
|
|
I do as Ian does. I custom built my own half stop to tune an accurate half and no extra resistance of the traditional spring loaded half stop. _________________ 1976 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics 427 pickup, 1975 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics X-12 pickup, Revelation preamp, Carbon Copy Delay and Hall Of Fame Reverb, Crown XLS 1002, 2- 15" Eminence Wheelhouse speakers, ShoBud Pedal, Effects Pedals. 1949 Epiphone D-8. |
|
|
|
Ian Worley
From: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 8:38 am
|
|
Helmut Gragger wrote: |
...I fail to see the purpose of a repeated c# there(the A pedal has one there anyways)... |
Jeff Newman lowered 2 to C# along with lowering the Es to give the re-entrant diatonic 9th tone with the open B6 chord, same as the the open D note on top on a typical modern C6 neck. The open D# is obviously redundant with Es lowered. _________________ All lies and jest, still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest - Paul Simon |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 8:40 am
|
|
Ah yes, this is reverse engineered. Interesting.
May I express my primary question differently: does anybody use the second string C# and in what situation?
Edit: Ian, you were faster. It defies my logic why this change is on the D lever then on all universals... _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Ian Worley
From: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 9:17 am
|
|
Helmut Gragger wrote: |
...It defies my logic why this change is on the D lever then on all universals... |
There are lots of situations where redundant notes and redundant changes are useful, many situations where the motion created by a change is more important than just the note it produces. A good early example of a beautiful change produced using the C# lower on 2 is the intro to Touch My Heart by Ray Price, Buddy Emmons on steel, he strikes and releases the C# (G actually at the 6th fret) on strings 2 and 5 simultaneously creating a beautiful contrary motion leading into the V: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJYFzEjrOuw. C# is the 6th tone of the open E chord, very useful there too along with the open B on 5. _________________ All lies and jest, still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest - Paul Simon |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 12:20 pm
|
|
What a song.
That´s mastership. What shall I say.
Thanks for the great explanation. I can hear what you say. _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Dennis Detweiler
From: Solon, Iowa, US
|
Posted 29 Jul 2021 2:20 pm
|
|
Another example:
You can also duplicate the Franklin 1st string F# to G# pedal pull (open E chord). Matching the two G# notes of the 1st and 3rd strings.
With the 2nd string tuned to C# and raised a full tone with a knee lever:
At the 5th fret with B pedal and Eb lever engaged (E7th position). Now raise the 2nd string a full tone F# to G# to match the G# on the 4th string. In this case it's a disadvantage to have the second string pull connected to the Eb lever. _________________ 1976 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics 427 pickup, 1975 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics X-12 pickup, Revelation preamp, Carbon Copy Delay and Hall Of Fame Reverb, Crown XLS 1002, 2- 15" Eminence Wheelhouse speakers, ShoBud Pedal, Effects Pedals. 1949 Epiphone D-8. |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 30 Jul 2021 4:34 am
|
|
Pro‘s and con‘s. Maybe It is wise to leave it as it is, and indeed concentrate on having fun playing. Thanks for your viewpoints. _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
J D Sauser
From: Wellington, Florida
|
Posted 30 Jul 2021 7:43 am Re: Universal E9/B6 2nd string half stop
|
|
William Carter wrote: |
When I ordered my U12, I researched a lot of different setups before finalizing the copedent. Now that I realize the struggle of lowering E's on a lever with 3 pulls, I am questioning why most of the copedents I looked at had the 2nd string whole-step lower on the same lever with the E-lowers. That makes 3 return springs I'm having to fight to play the D-lever.
Would there be any disadvantage to moving that whole step lower on the 2nd string to the same lever with the 1/2 step 2nd string lower (half stop mechanism) like what it is on my E9 guitar?
I do not know enough about the C6 side yet to understand if there was some reason universals put the E lowers with the 2nd string whole step lower. Is that the reason? |
I SPLIT both change onto different levers:
E9th Uni. has to re-create the "lost" 9th string D... so I put the 1/2 drop to D on the second string on THAT change. The thinking is the same... E7th
Likewise I put the full note drop on the E-to-Eb drop... because it is used as the C6th "D"... in B6th Db.
No more half stop. If you make the changes opposed or on different legs you can even create the staggered drop sound up and down.
... J-D. _________________ __________________________________________________________
Was it JFK who said: Ask Not What TAB Can Do For You - Rather Ask Yourself "What Would B.B. King Do?"
A Little Mental Health Warning:
Tablature KILLS SKILLS.
The uses of Tablature is addictive and has been linked to reduced musical fertility.
Those who produce Tablature did never use it.
I say it humorously, but I mean it. |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 3 Aug 2021 1:12 pm
|
|
Makes lot of sense - I might try that. _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Jim Pitman
From: Waterbury Ctr. VT 05677 USA
|
Posted 4 Aug 2021 4:07 am
|
|
I've dispensed with my second string half stop. It is now a half step lower only. I tend to use that descension quite often in a fast pace tune and I found I would overshoot and wind up somewhere between a half and full lower. I could make it work fine in slower material. Perhaps I'll go back to it but rig up an over-ride mechanism that stops at the half firmly. In this manner I could use it in both 1/8 note and longer note execution passages.
I've owned three PSGs with it and have always come to the same conclusion. |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 6 Aug 2021 9:46 am
|
|
If I understand you right, you basically talk about a dedicated half stop mechanism. I made up such a thing, and it stops precisely at the desired half stop position, but if you want it to be a pronounced stop that you do not easily overshoot, it ought to be firm, which inevitably adds some friction you have to overcome if you proceed to the end. I did it in a way that it does not add spring pressure like many of the spring based mechanism, but it has to add some tactile "detent" with some "friction" or it will be futile.
This will always be some kind of irritation. _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|