| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Baffle&Sounposts vs. Soundwell
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Baffle&Sounposts vs. Soundwell
Bob Stone


From:
Gainesville, FL, USA
Post  Posted 19 Mar 2002 8:07 am    
Reply with quote

It seems there are two main schools of thought in resophonic guitar making these days: traditional soundwell with a body made of laminated or solid wood and the baffle&soundpost design with a solid wood body.

In addition to my own 1990 60DS Dobro fitted with a Quarterman cone, bone nut and maple/ebony bridge saddle I have played three other resos recently: a Tennessee (Taylor) walnut (soundwell) and a DeNeve maple (soundwell) and a Gibson Jerry Douglas mahogany (baffle/soundposts).

Based on my limited experience it sure seemed like the baffle/sounpost Dobro ha a lot more "open" sound, especially on the bass. But if the baffle/soundpost design is best, why are so many builders still making instruments with soundwells?

I'd be very interested in hearing comments on and comparisons of instruments of these two designs.

By the way (based solely on the the info on their website and my limited knowledge), Clinesmith resos seem to be the most reasonably priced instruments of the baffle/soundpost design. And if the lead time is only two months or so, they sure beat Scheerhorn in that regard.

Please post your comments and comparisons.

Thanks,

Bob
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike D

 

From:
Phx, Az
Post  Posted 19 Mar 2002 4:23 pm    
Reply with quote

I've not been building spider cone guitars but on my wood single and tricones I leave the back entirely 'free' it's braced like an acoustic. I support the well with a brace that goes from head to tail. IMO this really opens up the tone and gives a great bass response.
I've talked to Paul Beard about soundwell vs posts and he basically said he likes the more vintage tone. Randy Allen builds using soundposts but doesn't use baffles. His guitars are highly rated too.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Stone


From:
Gainesville, FL, USA
Post  Posted 21 Mar 2002 5:51 am    
Reply with quote

Gee, I expected more action on this. Maybe some people were diverted to the Clinesmith thread.

I'll stick my neck out a little. To me it seems a baffle/soundpost reso sounds a little more like a guitar (i.e. more "open," especially on the bass) and a little less like a banjo when compared to a reso with a soundwell. That should stir things up!

Let's hear those comparisons.

Bob

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Scott Camara

 

From:
Connecticut
Post  Posted 21 Mar 2002 7:29 am    
Reply with quote

I have a McKenna with the soundwell and a Wolfe without. I was told that the Wolfe was designed just like an RQ Jones inside. I opened it up and its pretty crazy with the baffles, etc. I agree with your opinion that the baffle guitars sound more "open", its hard to describe. Its really just like a speaker box if you think about it, a speaker is really just moving air. By changing the size of the speaker enclosure, you get a different sound. The cone on a reso is really like a speaker, so I think that without the soundwell its like having a bigger box. Also, you get more of the "guitar" sound because the soundwell really keeps the top from vibrating. Different size/shape holes in the soundwell will also change the sound.

Which is better? I like em both.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Howard Parker


From:
Maryland
Post  Posted 22 Mar 2002 2:22 pm    
Reply with quote

Paul Beard has made and sold several arch back, square neck guitars. No internals except for the resonator/spider resting on a traditional shelf.

Amazing sounding box and very unique. I believe that Phil Leadbetter plays one now.
hp


------------------
Howard Parker
poobah@resoguit.com
www.resoguit.com
ListOwner RESOGUIT

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Andy Volk


From:
Boston, MA
Post  Posted 22 Mar 2002 6:45 pm    
Reply with quote

My Benoit with koa body & spruce top has a traditional soundwell albiet with special heavy duty construction. I always thought it sounded more guitar like than other resophonics I've heard. I've played a cherry veneer Beard, a mahagony Gibson Jerry Douglas model, an upgraded Regal and a few vintage squarenecks at Gruhn Guitars. None sounded outright bad. The plywood models sound more metalic, more "Dobro-like" for want of a better phrase - likely due to more damping of the body than with a solid wood instrument. The JD Gibson is the only one I've played with the soundpost design. It had a warm, open sound. Tim Sheerhorn told me his design philosophy was to create a guitar that could go head-to-head with a banjo in terms of volume. Rob Icks sounds great playing a Rosewood/Spruce model. I always dug the more mellow tone Mike Aldridge gets on record. I'm very happy with the warmth & projection of the Benoit. My 2 cents.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron