Author |
Topic: Parallax and string height |
George Biner
From: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted 27 Mar 2020 5:51 pm
|
|
I'm newish to the pedal steel -- been thinking, why are the strings so high off the fretboard? I've had 1/2 a mind to shim up the fretboard to like 1/4" below the strings -- that would improve the sightlines and reduce the parallax between the steel and the fret line, while not impacting the playability. I know, not necessary, people been playing like this for years, suck it up, etc. Still, why the dang strings so high? _________________ Guacamole Mafia - acoustic harmony duo
Electrical engineer / amp tech in West Los Angeles -- I fix Peaveys
"Now there is a snappy sounding instrument. That f****r really sings." - Jerry Garcia |
|
|
|
Jon Voth
From: Virginia, USA
|
Posted 27 Mar 2020 8:55 pm
|
|
Also newish, and I'll add to this question.
I'm doing OK, and can't change the tradition of things.
But seems like a small adjustment can make an even smaller improvement in technique.
But still we're using our ears as the main guide (and we can't squish the strings down enough to touch anything anyways). |
|
|
|
Ian Rae
From: Redditch, England
|
Posted 28 Mar 2020 12:31 am
|
|
I'm thinking that there will always be some parallax however slight the height.
I play fretless bass on some numbers, and on the lower-numbered frets even though there is no clearance at all the ears are still more accurate than the eyes! _________________ Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs |
|
|
|
Erv Niehaus
From: Litchfield, MN, USA
|
Posted 28 Mar 2020 7:21 am
|
|
I think originally the strings were rather high off the fretboard so if you hammered down on the strings with your bar you wouldn't bang on the fretboard.
Hammer on's were used quite often by the old non-pedal steelers.
Erv |
|
|
|
Pete Burak
From: Portland, OR USA
|
Posted 28 Mar 2020 7:28 am
|
|
The Sierra Crown Model had a very high neck that curved downward near the picking area so your finger-picks wouldn't click on the neck. Buddy Emmons played one for a while.
I liked it better than the later Session Series necks, which were flat from end to end.
If you watch Paul Franklin play, he really keeps his head/eyes right over the bar, more than most any other players I've seen. |
|
|
|
Pat Chong
From: New Mexico, USA
|
Posted 28 Mar 2020 7:38 am
|
|
Hi George,
I have seen some guitars with what seem pretty high strings. But after a while of playing, I realised it is all relative. Jon is right, it's in the ear, when you hear it is out of tune, you adjust your position, anyway. Try playing Clint Blacks "Nobody's home" on YouTube. You have to play in the middle of the frets to be in tune.......Pat. |
|
|
|
Larry Bressington
From: Nebraska
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 9:44 am
|
|
On the other side of the coin, if you go lower strings to fretboard ratio, you wont have enough clearance to see the fret marks as you slide up and down like you do a regular guitar, because your hand is operating in the opposite direction.
Currently if you play at fret one, you can see the fret mark, if you lower down too much your hand will be blocking and shadowing that view, however in saying that ive played an acoustic guitar set up as dobro without strings being raised and did not give me any problems, so my theory might not be valid, maybe it's because of the changer height required. |
|
|
|
Rick Barnhart
From: Arizona, USA
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 10:58 am
|
|
If you ever play a steel with the action too low, I think you’ll understand, then. _________________ Clinesmith consoles D-8/6 5 pedal, D-8 3 pedal & A25 Frypan, Pettingill Teardrop, & P8 Deluxe. |
|
|
|
Donny Hinson
From: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 11:12 am Re: Parallax and string height
|
|
George Biner wrote: |
I'm newish to the pedal steel -- been thinking, why are the strings so high off the fretboard? I've had 1/2 a mind to shim up the fretboard to like 1/4" below the strings -- that would improve the sightlines and reduce the parallax between the steel and the fret line, while not impacting the playability. |
Adapting to a minor problem can be more practical and useful than trying to fix that problem. (It's easier to lean into the wind than it is to try and stop it. ) |
|
|
|
Curt Trisko
From: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 11:23 am
|
|
Pete Burak wrote: |
The Sierra Crown Model had a very high neck that curved downward near the picking area so your finger-picks wouldn't click on the neck. |
I have no idea what the answer to the question is, but this makes a ton of sense to me. It would be really obnoxious to have my picks constantly hitting the neck. My fretboard has small scratches beneath the first string the way it is from me overreaching to pick that string.
There are so many other quirks about the steel guitar where it seems the answer to "why?" is because no one thought it was a big enough issue to change it. |
|
|
|
Erv Niehaus
From: Litchfield, MN, USA
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 11:30 am
|
|
No need to re-invent the wheel.
Erv |
|
|
|
Georg Sørtun
From: Mandal, Agder, Norway
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 12:02 pm
|
|
Will mention that when I replaced the neck on my Dekley, I ended up cutting the distance between strings and fretboard to about half – about 1/3in now (see picture).
The reduction caused by the thicker neck was by choice for other reasons. But what matters here is that the altered distance doesn't affect my intonation any compared to playing my unaltered PSGs. |
|
|
|
Jack Hanson
From: San Luis Valley, USA
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 12:44 pm
|
|
In my experience, the parallax effect is very real. The old student-model instruments from the Emmons Company were originally constructed with strings very high above the fretboard. The subsequent "Black Rock" models solved the problem buy installing a "neck" (for lack of a better term) to raise the fretboard closer to the strings. Installing a Black Rock-style neck on a student model greatly reduces the parallax, and imporoves its playability in my opinion.
Emmons #278 GS with Black Rock neck (Clem Schmitz photo). |
|
|
|
Jerry Jones
From: Franklin, Tenn.
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 1:51 pm
|
|
Neck thickness aside, some of the string height is necessary for proper down-bearing for strings 5 and 6. _________________ Jerry Jones |
|
|
|
Glenn Suchan
From: Austin, Texas
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 1:53 pm
|
|
The fret 'lines' on the neck of a PSG are visual references. I've found if you develop the habit of sitting in the same spot in relation to your fret board, i.e. the tenth fret, you'll be able to develop a sense of the parallax view which indicates that your bar is correctly positioned. Note: The parallax deviation increases the farther to the left or right of your seated position. To accomplish correct bar positioning with a parallax view you first need to develop your ears to hear correct pitch, and rely on your parallax view second.
Keep on pickin'!
Glenn _________________ Steelin' for Jesus |
|
|
|
Bobby D. Jones
From: West Virginia, USA
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 7:52 pm
|
|
If you start at the key head, The height of the body of the keys themselves is about 3/4" so the key heads are about 1" tall so the keys will fit proper. Then the Nut Rollers need to be tall enough so the strings pull down on the Nut Rollers so there is no weird sounds from the strings.
Next Pickup, Many old steel pickups are made with about 1" long magnets to get 17,500 to 20,000 ohms of resistance in the pickups. You must have space for padding or springs between the body and the pickup. If not the pickup will pick up and amplify noise from the Pedals, Rods and Changer.
Then the Changer, Because of the wood that must be removed from the body, So the changer fingers will extend down to the Pull Rods, A metal frame is needed to spread the pressure on the body over a larger area.
The high strings puts more tension on the body and neck for better sound and sustain. |
|
|
|
Dave Mudgett
From: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
|
Posted 3 Apr 2020 9:13 pm
|
|
I have a non-pedal steel whose strings are pretty close to the fretboard - I mean around 1/4-5/16" instead of the usual 1/2-5/8" on my other steels, both non-pedal and pedal. It drives me crazy - when I tilt the bar, it's hard to keep it from hitting the fretboard. And forget about slamming the bar. I'm going to put on heavier strings to try to keep that from happening. But I think it's still gonna take some time to get used to, and I suspect it's gonna continue to annoy me.
As far as additional design rationale for higher strings - I think the acoustic tone, volume, and sustain suffers with lower strings - keeping the nut low would change the break angle and there may be other issues. I guess that could be dealt with by keeping the nut high and padding the fretboard, but I still don't think strings close to the fretboard is a good idea. I guess I think it creates more long-term problems than the short-term issues it makes easier.
I think parallax is an issue steel players just have to learn to deal with. Whether it's 1/4" or 1/2" or more, it's very different than standard guitar or even slide guitar. I play slide a lot, and I would never have strings anything like even 1/4" above the frets. Compensating for parallax is a learned skill. And, as was stated in earlier replies, fret markers are guides to bar positioning. Playing in tune requires using well-developed ears to rapidly detect pitch discrepancies and then highly-developed and autonomic motor skills to make accurate corrections on the fly. I don't think there's any easy way out |
|
|
|
Dave Hepworth
From: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted 4 Apr 2020 6:49 am
|
|
Seat height is another factor.Higher you sit less the parrallax! |
|
|
|