| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Emmons 13 secret’s for sound
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Emmons 13 secret’s for sound
Fred Treece


From:
California, USA
Post  Posted 27 Jun 2018 6:19 pm    
Reply with quote

Tom Wolverton wrote:
But the big problem (I think) is there is no criteria for “good tone”. The outputs from a FEM model would generate a lot of data that would leave me scratching my head saying “OK, what does all of this really tell us?”. This could be quite frustrating.

However, if you wanted to examine cabinet drop or thermal-elastic changes to the guitar’s tuning, a FEM model could do that fairly easily.

I think you are on to something there. But you would have to analyze at least two relatively similar instruments - one with generally accepted great tone and one with generally accepted bad tone - and see what the obvious differences are. You might also compare the results of two very good sounding but dissimilar steels to see what they have in common and what is different.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lonnie Portwood


From:
Jacksonville, fl. USA
Post  Posted 27 Jun 2018 6:38 pm    
Reply with quote

I personally know of four guys, Bill Ferguson, Larry Bullock, Jack Daughtery, Chet Gibson, all of whom owned or own Emmons guitars and every one sounds "Heavenly"! Now, I had a red one, which was the worst playing , sounding no good guitar I ever owned, and I've owned plenty. I once heard Ed Fulawka say that the neck of a steel guitar had nothing to do with tone, or sustain. I also owned a S 10 Emmons once which played and sounded wonderful, it had Buddy's signature underneath.

If you were to go to any major guitar mfg. company, pick thru 50 guitars hanging on the rack, built and handled by the same techs, you might find two, three, maybe four that were "special". You knew the minute you laid hands on it.

Same is true with steel guitars,people, cars, etc. No two pieces of wood are alike, even if they came from the same tree.

Harold Flynn, who worked for Shot Jackson back in the day, told me that Shot would "tune His steel bodies, and even His amps. If the piece didn't resonate, He might take a little material off, here or there, til He got it like He wanted. Just sayin! LP
_________________
Music is probably the most "spiritual of mankinds emotions, and when practised with a pure heart, can lead one into the presence of God, who invented it. Lonnie Portwood
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
George Seymour


From:
Notown, Vermont, USA
Post  Posted 29 Jun 2018 4:56 am    
Reply with quote

On this subject...what would Buddy Emmons do? From first hand recollection he would simply rake across either or both necks unamplified and would be able to tell how good the guitar would respond tone wise..like one mantra says everything matters...not every prewar flathead was magical..oh but those that were...deep in the well for old Emmons D-10. Not all are created equal..but the arrow and the Indian is also pretty applicable
_________________
Old Emmons D-10's & Wrap Resound 65, Standel amps!
Old Gibson Mastertones
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Stroud

 

From:
Texas
Post  Posted 29 Jun 2018 6:49 am    
Reply with quote

I would think Buddy Emmons knew on a deeper level what made a great sounding steel because he had to have known the confidential processes used to build Emmons guitars... Maybe not, I don't know.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erv Niehaus


From:
Litchfield, MN, USA
Post  Posted 29 Jun 2018 7:26 am    
Reply with quote

I understand that Buddy would rake the strings and then grab a leg. If he could feel the vibrations of the strings in the leg, it was a good one.
Erv
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lee Baucum


From:
McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) The Final Frontier
Post  Posted 29 Jun 2018 9:23 am    
Reply with quote

Erv Niehaus wrote:
I understand that Buddy would rake the strings and then grab a leg. If he could feel the vibrations of the strings in the leg, it was a good one.
Erv


Others claim that if you can feel the vibrations in the legs, energy is being transferred to the floor.

Confused
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 29 Jun 2018 5:04 pm    
Reply with quote

Lee Baucum wrote:
Erv Niehaus wrote:
I understand that Buddy would rake the strings and then grab a leg. If he could feel the vibrations of the strings in the leg, it was a good one.
Erv


Others claim that if you can feel the vibrations in the legs, energy is being transferred to the floor.

Confused
Not to worry … "transfer" doesn't mean "loss" in this context.

With enough energy charged in a heavy PSG body, transfer of vibrations through to the floor indicates the build-up of sub-harmonics. Build-up of strong sub-harmonics tend to cause what is known as "blooming" – kick-back from delayed sympathetic vibrations, a desirable effect that results in warmer tone and increased sustain.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Al Evans


From:
Austin, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 4:48 am    
Reply with quote

Georg Sørtun wrote:

With enough energy charged in a heavy PSG body, transfer of vibrations through to the floor indicates the build-up of sub-harmonics. Build-up of strong sub-harmonics tend to cause what is known as "blooming" – kick-back from delayed sympathetic vibrations, a desirable effect that results in warmer tone and increased sustain.


So you add a good contact pickup to the floor, and... Very Happy

--Al Evans
_________________
2018 MSA Legend, 2018 ZumSteel Encore, 2015 Mullen G2, G&L S-500, G&L ASAT, G&L LB-100, Godin A4 Fretless, Kinscherff High Noon
View user's profile Send private message
Charlie McDonald


From:
out of the blue
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 5:53 am    
Reply with quote

So does anybody know one of Emmons' secrets of sound?

Anything to do with a horseshoe ring or other conspiracies?

I would however like to hear Ross Shafer on the subject.
I hope he reveals that the neck has nothing to do with it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 7:39 am    
Reply with quote

Al Evans wrote:
So you add a good contact pickup to the floor, and... Very Happy
Laughing
… what goes down will come up again, so no need for that Very Happy

OTOH, I have had some luck with attaching contact PUs on my modified Dekley w/ floating neck. Didn't care for the mixer needed to balance the levels with the regular PU, but boy did it bloom.
That same PSG literally "thunders" through to the floor, and beats all PSGs I over the years have had the chance to compare it with when it comes to sustain.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
b0b


From:
Cloverdale, CA, USA
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 9:32 am    
Reply with quote

Where did you attach the contact PUs, Georg?
_________________
-𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 12:54 pm    
Reply with quote

b0b wrote:
Where did you attach the contact PUs, Georg?
At various points along the edge of the floating neck – mainly from fret 12 down to nut, and on the soundboard near/inside the keyhead.


Note that as bridge/changer/PU on this particular PSG is not in contact with the soundboard/body – carried entirely by the neck that floats free of the soundboard down to fret 12…



… most of how vibrations spread within it is irrelevant for traditionally designed PSGs where vibrations spread directly from the bridge to the body.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Henry Matthews


From:
Texarkana, Ark USA
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 2:18 pm    
Reply with quote

I’ve heard that everything done to the Emmons push pull was done with tone in mind. The little wire hooks keep the guitar resonating around pickup and not being dampened into the cross bars by rods. The cut out for the tone control and neck switch was done that way for a reason to make tone better.
_________________
Henry Matthews

D-10 Magnum, 8 &5, dark rose color
D-10 1974 Emmons cut tail, fat back,rosewood, 8&5
Nashville 112 amp, Fishman Loudbox Performer amp, Hilton pedal, Goodrich pedal,BJS bar, Kyser picks, Live steel Strings. No effects, doodads or stomp boxes.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Greg Lambert

 

From:
Illinois, USA
Post  Posted 30 Jun 2018 2:49 pm    
Reply with quote

I have seen Jeff Newman play different steels and they all sounded marvelous. So , the guitar plays a little in the sound quality but the player plays a greater part in this.
IMHO
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Marco Schouten


From:
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Post  Posted 1 Jul 2018 3:14 am    
Reply with quote

I think a large part has to do with the amount of aluminium in the changer fingers. They were pretty massive and solid compared to the thin scissors of the all-pull guitars.
_________________
----------------------------------
JCH SD-10 with BL XR-16 pickup, Sho-Bud Volume Pedal, Evidence Audio Lyric HG cables, Quilter Steelaire combo
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Louis Falardeau

 

From:
San Antonio, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 1 Jul 2018 5:33 am    
Reply with quote

I have always thought the changer made the biggest difference. I am sure Ron tried to keep all the other factors that affect the sound the same as much as possible when he made the La Grande. But my
La Grande was good tonewise but not as good as my push pulls. It would be interesting to hear from someone who had a push pull conversion. Also I believe pull release guitars have a better sound than all pull guitars generally due to the mass in the changer finger. All pull guitars seem to all have thin scissor fingers.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tim Herman


From:
Alberta, Canada
Post  Posted 1 Jul 2018 5:46 am    
Reply with quote

I am far from an expert, but lately, as I begin to play more in tune, I am noticing a better tone as a result. Just as an experiment, I tried tuning just a little sour, and my sustain decreased. I think that sweet harmonies want to "bloom", and dissonant sounds tend to choke.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Paul Sutherland

 

From:
Placerville, California
Post  Posted 1 Jul 2018 7:56 am    
Reply with quote

When the steel is in tune, and the band is in tune, the tone of the steel miraculously gets better. That's been my experience

When your steel just doesn't sound like it should, check your tuning first. Don't start turning knobs on the amp until you're sure the steel is in tune.

Apologies in advance for the topic drift.
_________________
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tim Herman


From:
Alberta, Canada
Post  Posted 1 Jul 2018 8:13 am    
Reply with quote

Paul, I suppose you are right about the topic drift, but at least one of the 13 secrets must be tuning.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jerry Overstreet


From:
Louisville Ky
Post  Posted 1 Jul 2018 8:16 am    
Reply with quote

I think one of the secrets is the label. I took the badge off mine one time and the tone just wasn't the same, so I screwed it back on.
View user's profile Send private message
Larry Bressington

 

From:
Nebraska
Post  Posted 6 Jul 2018 11:17 am    
Reply with quote

I think the 13 secrets might be this?
2 thumbs
8 fingers
1 guitar
1 amp
1 volume pedal
=13
_________________
A.K.A Chappy.
View user's profile Send private message
Johnie King


From:
Tennessee, USA
Post  Posted 6 Jul 2018 5:51 pm    
Reply with quote

Larry you win the door prize almost. But a Emmons dose have a sound of its own good bad or ugly. I’ll vote good!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Johnie King


From:
Tennessee, USA
Post  Posted 6 Jul 2018 6:00 pm    
Reply with quote

George how did you come up with the floating necki plus changer attached to neck only? Would love to here a sample sound.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 6 Jul 2018 6:54 pm    
Reply with quote

Johnie King wrote:
George how did you come up with the floating necki plus changer attached to neck only?

Read (almost) all about it at http://www.gunlaug.no/msc/smc-090617.html
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Gary Spaeth

 

From:
Wisconsin, USA
Post  Posted 5 Jan 2019 1:45 pm    
Reply with quote

i wonder if using wood like this with big knots running through the soundboard helps or hurts tone? soundboards are usually defect free quarter sawn boards. maybe it doesn't matter because the neck is the "soundboard."



Last edited by Gary Spaeth on 7 Jan 2019 5:23 am; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron