Author |
Topic: What do you lap cats think of this tuning? |
Jim Cohen
From: Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted 11 Aug 2014 8:35 pm
|
|
Just spotted this discussion over on the jazz guitar forum and a light bulb went on in me that maybe this would be a really useful lap steel tuning. It's created just by adding a b6 to a major scale. There's an amazing variety of chords you can get in any one position: Maj, maj7, m7, dim, m7b5, aug5, dom7, and more. Plus you can get scalar lines straight across without lots of bar movement that's needed in 3rds-based tunings. Not sure there's any lap steel tuning that is this versatile, is there? Can Leavitt tuning do this much? What do you folks think?
Quote: |
One thing that is interesting to me is how much impact adding a single note (to a major scale) makes.
C D E F G Ab A B C
Cma7 / Cma7+
Dm7 / Dm7b5 / Ddim
Em7 / E7 / E7+
FmMa7 / Fma7 / Fdim / FdimMa7
G7
Abma7+ / Abdim / AbdimMa7
Am7 / AmMa7
Bdim / Bm7b5
8 note scales can be conceived of as two or more 7 note scales joining forces.
In this instance the 8 note scale houses all the harmonic content of C Major,
C Harmonic Major and A Harmonic Minor. It is more expansive than a single
7 noter and more manageable than 12 tone chromatic.
|
_________________ www.JimCohen.com
www.RonstadtRevue.com
www.BeatsWalkin.com |
|
|
|
Earnest Bovine
From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
Posted 11 Aug 2014 10:07 pm
|
|
Looks very nice, Jim. Besides counting 3-noe and 4-note chords, I think you can evaluate the practicality of a tuning by noting which intervals (2-note chords) are available. Those are more likely what you will grab in a real playing situation. And this tuning has every interval up to an octave, with one either string 1 or string 2 on top, so it's very useful.
Downsides of this tuning would be the limited range, and the arguable fact that strings higher than C sound better for melody, but you don't have any. |
|
|
|
Jean-Sebastien Gauthier
From: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted 12 Aug 2014 5:08 am
|
|
Personally I dont like this tuning. The interval are two close, like Earnest said you have a limited range.
To me its a big mistake to try to have full 4 notes or more chords in one straight position, I think the beauty of non pedal is to chase for 2 and 3 part harmony, tritone and chord substitution. Its a part of the fun and the sound to moving the bar and doing slant, in non pedal the left hand is very active and that give a feeling.
With a 13 tuning like C13 or E13 you can get all what you need. |
|
|
|
Mike Neer
From: NJ
|
Posted 12 Aug 2014 5:13 am
|
|
I don't think it's a mistake at all to have chromatically tuned strings, if that's what one needs. We all have different conceptions of how we want to play. I was very close to doing something similar to this with my Clinesmith. I studied the Alkire tuning and devised my own, eliminating or changing what I thought would work for me.
I play C13 tuning, 10 strings, and no, I can't get everything I want--I make do with what I have. I'd rather get what I want. 1/2 steps are the only element of my guitar playing that I have not been able to transfer to steel. I need that in my chords. When I play a Maj7 chord, my favorite voicing is a derivation of the 3rd inversion, so it looks like this on guitar:
C Maj7
----3---------
----1---------
----4---------
----2---------
--------------
--------------
I do agree, though, having a lot of chords available without moving the bar is not really something that interests me, but having the ability to get all the extensions and inversions is important. _________________ Links to streaming music, websites, YouTube: Links |
|
|
|
Bill Hatcher
From: Atlanta Ga. USA
|
Posted 12 Aug 2014 6:38 am
|
|
jim. tune a guitar to that and play something! all tunings are relevant!! takes an adventurous player to try a new tuning and see what happens. i have the leavitt extended out to 14 strings with some chromatics ala the alkire. i retune my two lowest string to whatever i need in the bass.
i see no sense in being constrained by standardization of tunings. |
|
|
|
Doug Beaumier
From: Northampton, MA
|
Posted 12 Aug 2014 6:56 am
|
|
Like most diatonic tunings it would offer a lot of chords and beautiful sounds, but it wouldn't be easy to play, not for beginning players IMO. There wouldn't be much strumming, but a more careful, selective picking of certain strings and omitting other strings to avoid unwanted notes. Scale based tunings have been around for a long time: JB's C diatonic, extended Leavitt, the Alkire Eharp tuning, and recent tunings devised by Forum members here. I've experimented with C diatonic a bit, and there are some beautiful and interesting sounds in it, but for me it's mostly a hobby tuning that I play at home. I don't really need it for my band work. I can see how a jazz player would like this tuning though. _________________ My Site / My YouTube Channel
25 Songs C6 Lap Steel / 25 MORE Songs C6 Lap Steel / 16 Songs, C6, A6, B11 / 60 Popular Melodies E9 Pedal Steel |
|
|
|
Ian Kerr
From: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted 12 Aug 2014 4:29 pm
|
|
Not keen on it as a tuning for my lap steel as I do see some difficulties imposed for my style of playing with regard to picking,strums,sweeps,sliding,slants.Having said that,on the pedal steel [am I allowed to say that here]it's a different story as that movement [A to Ab]on a lever works so well with pedals 5 & 6 and you get the close voicing of B and C as in Mike Neer's Cmaj7 chord for standard guitar. |
|
|
|