Author |
Topic: Stroboflip sweetened tuning |
Jeremy Marcum
From: Northport, Alabama... USA
|
Posted 22 Mar 2014 9:47 pm
|
|
Hello, does anyone have the peterson stroboflip sE9 sweetened tuning wrote down?
How does the new stroboplus hd compare with the stroboflip?
Jm |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Charlie Powell
From: Kingsport, Tennessee, USA
|
Posted 23 Mar 2014 1:16 am
|
|
It is included on page 35 of the stroboflip manual.
http://www.petersontuners.com/media/pdf/StroboflipManualEnglish.pdf
I have both the flip and the stroboplus hd. I find the stroboplus to be quieter, and the display easier to read and seems to stabilize a bit better. It is also quieter if left in line.
I have a couple of my own personal offsets. If you use a computer, the stroboplus is much easier to customize with your own offsets than the stroboflip is. _________________ Charlie Powell |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Jack Stoner
From: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted 23 Mar 2014 2:13 am
|
|
I like the new StroboPlus HD over the older models.
I have the Jeff Newman (at 442.5) both opens and pedals/knee levers programmed into one program for E9th (except for the 4th string E to F#) This includes some common knee lever changes today that were non existent or not common back when Newman created his charts (e.g. the first string F# to G# and 2nd string D# to E). Same way for the C6th all except the 3rd string C to B in one program. I have a third program with the two extra changes.
You couldn't do that with the older Peterson tuners.
I've "Shared" my programs with quite a few from the forum. |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |
Jeremy Marcum
From: Northport, Alabama... USA
|
Posted 23 Mar 2014 6:53 am
|
|
Thanks for the replys Jack and Charles |
|
|
![](templates/respond/images/spacer.gif) |