| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Standard Sacred Steeler copedent?
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Standard Sacred Steeler copedent?
David Doggett


From:
Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
Post  Posted 30 Jul 2003 10:46 am    
Reply with quote

I am converting a neck on a Carter D12 to a Sacred Steeler setup (the other neck is a universal). For the SS neck I have 12 strings, 3 or 4 pedals, and about 3 knee levers (LKL, LKV, LKR), maybe more if I hook up the right knee levers to both necks. I want to get as close to Robert Randolph's setup as I can get.

The trouble is that RR's setup posted at the Carter web site has 8 pedals and 5 knees. Which ones do I really need, and which ones can I forget about? Chuck Cambell also has a 12-string 8&5 setup posted there. He has the same pedals as RR, but almost completely different knees. Chuck's lower 2 strings are different, and I prefer RR's strings, I think, although I know he now plays a 13-string, probably with a low B.

Last year I watched RR play from directly overhead (there was a balcony over the stage). I got an eyeful of his hand-work, and could see his feet. He has lightening fast fingers and bar, but almost never used any pedals. So maybe it's no biggie which ones I have. I couldn't see his knees, but I have a feeling he used them as little as the pedals. Still, I'd like to have the most important ones. Does anyone on the Forum have a clue which ones they would be? Anyone actually tried any of these tunings?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jon Light (deceased)


From:
Saugerties, NY
Post  Posted 30 Jul 2003 11:30 am    
Reply with quote

I can't help much but I can share this tidbit--I saw RR, I forget, two or three years ago, and chatted very briefly with him. One tip he passed on after I commented on his rhythm playing--the choppin' chords thing he does--is the importance of the double E's in the low-middle of his tuning and the importance of not having the F# getting in the way. Well I'm not interested in losing my F# and it's far too important to me to put on a lever so I did it in reverse--I lower my F# to E on a lever. Although there are some uses for this as a change, the main intent was to be able to get it out of the way of a flanging, slamming thumb chop.
But the full truth is that I haven't explored that direction of playing much at all and it's sort of a back burner thing for me.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bobby Lee


From:
Cloverdale, California, USA
Post  Posted 30 Jul 2003 7:09 pm    
Reply with quote

Maybe this page will help you understand it better. Here are the "essential" changes on 8 strings.



If you can set up 4 pedals and 3 knee levers, you'll have everything you need. You can add strings above and below to fill out your 12 string, but the essense of it is in those 8 strings.

The double-E tuning idea is great for rhythm playing. I've been using it for a few years now. It's a lot of fun to be able to strum majors, minors and seventh chords when someone else is taking the lead.

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9),
Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax

[This message was edited by Bobby Lee on 30 July 2003 at 08:23 PM.]

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
David Doggett


From:
Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
Post  Posted 31 Jul 2003 7:46 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks, b0b. I was hoping you'd chime in. I know you have played around with this and I've been looking at your stuff about it in the Forum Tunings section. In the 10-string version you said you ended up with, you have a couple of changes I'm curious about. Your p1 lowers the 2nd string to G and raises the 6th string to A. Why did you need those when you already had p3 raising both 2 and 6 to an A, and p5 lowering both 2 and 6 to a G? Likewise, your RKR gives you a C# on string 4 and an A on string 9, when you already have both of those on other pedals or knees. Could you explain how those are useful?

Thanks, and I hope others have some opinions. I know Dan Tyack has looked into this stuff.

[This message was edited by David Doggett on 31 July 2003 at 08:50 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bobby Lee


From:
Cloverdale, California, USA
Post  Posted 31 Jul 2003 10:05 am    
Reply with quote

That p1 change was something I had been experimenting with on E9th for a while. It's not as useful as I had hoped, and I've since removed it.

Lowering string 9 to A is very useful for rhythm if you don't have a low G# string. It gives me a full A or A7 chord with a proper root tone for strumming.

FWIW, my current 10 string copedent isn't what is shown in the article. It's still evolving, and I haven't published my most recent changes online.

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9),
Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chas smith R.I.P.


From:
Encino, CA, USA
Post  Posted 31 Jul 2003 10:33 am    
Reply with quote

From a review of the Blasters at Dingwalls in London, where RR opened, printed in The Guardian:

For starters, there was a pulverising set by Robert Randolph and the Family Band, in London on their way to the Cambridge folk festival. Randolph sat centre stage behind his 13-stringed pedal steel guitar, but we could forget any notions of country music. He used the instrument to play crunching blues and howling quasi-metal, most spectacularly on a version of Jimi Hendrix's Voodoo Chile that might have had its author stroking his chin and wondering how he did it. Randolph has a new album called Unclassified, which describes his music perfectly.
View user's profile Send private message
David Doggett


From:
Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
Post  Posted 1 Aug 2003 9:44 am    
Reply with quote

Chuck Cambell has a new CD for sale on the Carter web site, and you can sample the MP3 version on a couple of cuts. He is so smooth and precise it sounds exactly like a lead guitar in places, not like a steel or slide guitar at all. That's interesting and challenging, but not really what I'm after. I like the steel and slide sound.

Thanks for the comments on copedents. I'll report back when I try this for awhile.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron