| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic restored 1963 Fender 400 Steel Guitar
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  restored 1963 Fender 400 Steel Guitar
Nick Anderson

 

From:
IL
Post  Posted 18 Aug 2013 1:21 pm    
Reply with quote

Here is my restored Fender 400 steel. It was labeled under the body as a 1963. I got it with no pedals, pedalboard or under carriage hardware.



I stripped the lacquer, had the chrome re-plated and had the metal frame powdercoated.



The pics in the bright sun show it to be more red, but it is more of a red walnut color.



I made the pedal board and adapted the "stamped" pedals, instead of the "cast" pedals the steel would have come with.



I have the guitar tuned to C6(A-C-E-G-A-C-E-G) with pedals 1-3 being P5, P6 and P7 from the 10-string tuning. Pedal 4 lowers string 4, which helps to do away with a bar slant I've been using. I figure if Buddy Emmons and John Hughey had that lower, so can I. LOL Hope you enjoy!

Thanks,
Nick Anderson
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Richard Sinkler


From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
Post  Posted 18 Aug 2013 1:42 pm    
Reply with quote

Nice job.
_________________
Carter D10 8p/8k, Dekley S10 3p/4k C6 setup,Regal RD40 Dobro, Recording King Professional Dobro, NV400, NV112,Ibanez Gio guitar, Epiphone SG Special (open D slide guitar) . Playing for 54 years and still counting.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Micky Byrne


From:
United Kingdom (deceased)
Post  Posted 19 Aug 2013 1:55 am    
Reply with quote

Well done Nick....looks classy Smile


Micky "scars" Byrne U.K.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Russell


From:
Virginia, USA
Post  Posted 19 Aug 2013 4:32 am    
Reply with quote

Beautifully done! Congrats and happy pickin'.
_________________
Lots of stringy things, many of them slidey.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bob Russell


From:
Virginia, USA
Post  Posted 19 Aug 2013 5:06 am     more Fender porn?
Reply with quote

How about some shots of the undercarriage? Smile
_________________
Lots of stringy things, many of them slidey.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fred Glave


From:
McHenry, Illinois, USA
Post  Posted 19 Aug 2013 9:57 am    
Reply with quote

Looks gorgeous.
_________________
Zum Encore, Zum Stage One, Fender 2000, Harlan Bros., Multi-Kord,
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jean-Sebastien Gauthier


From:
Quebec, Canada
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 4:04 am    
Reply with quote

Great job!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Gene Jones

 

From:
Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 9:15 am    
Reply with quote

I owned a Fender 1000 early in my career, but I also owned an original 1949 Fender three-neck, one of the first of that era.

Any of those early guitars that can be restored is a worthy endeavor, however, there is no
financial gain in doing it. Historical value is the only incentive for saving these artifacts from the past.
_________________
"FROM THEN TIL' NOW"
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jean-Sebastien Gauthier


From:
Quebec, Canada
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 9:29 am    
Reply with quote

Gene Jones wrote:
Historical value is the only incentive for saving these artifacts from the past.


Tone can be another incentive!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alan Brookes


From:
Brummy living in Southern California
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 9:33 am    
Reply with quote

Attractive job, well done. Cool

I've restored three over the years; I even covered one with vinyl; but I've never managed to get the cable mechanism working the way I would have liked. Particularly on the double-necked D10 the cables keep getting tangled. Embarassed
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Nick Anderson

 

From:
IL
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 4:27 pm    
Reply with quote

Here is the undercarriage . . .



It was primed, sprayed with drywall texture, then painted black with an ordinary interior latex.

The foam quiets the cables.

I agree with the point of view that I will not get much on resale, it's vintage, but not era correct. If I'm correct, a '63 would have come with cast pedals instead of stamped. I prefer the stamped pedals. I restored it to be what it is . . . to be played. And to see if I could do it.

Thanks to everyone for the kind words!

Nick Anderson
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Michael Maddex


From:
Northern New Mexico, USA
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 5:18 pm    
Reply with quote

Nick, it looks very sharp. I have a ~1964 short scale 400 like yours that came from the factory with six stamped chrome pedals, so you are not period incorrect there. You can catch a glimpse of it in my avatar. There was a period in the early sixties where Fender shipped the new short scale bodies with the old pedal boards. I have seen some photos of a couple of others. The stories of Leo using up the old stock before starting in on the new seem to be endless.

Enjoy! Cool
_________________
"For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert." -- Arthur C. Clarke
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Chris Lucker

 

From:
Los Angeles, California USA
Post  Posted 20 Aug 2013 5:25 pm    
Reply with quote

I had a 1963 that had cast pedals that looked just like the stamped pedals. Here is what they looked like. They had a plated steel tip on the toe:



_________________
Chris Lucker
Red Bellies, Bigsbys and a lot of other guitars.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron