| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Replacement Reverb Tanks
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Replacement Reverb Tanks
Dan Beller-McKenna


From:
Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Post  Posted 4 May 2012 2:04 am    
Reply with quote

One of my Twins' reverb tanks has gone bad; makes a dull ticking sound (okay, honestly, it's more of a farting sound) when jiggled, rather than the usual "boing." Nothing is visibly amiss inside, and I'm not going to spend the time to try and fix it since they are relatively cheap.

I always find the Fender Twin reverb a tad boingy for steel (I never play six string any more), and thought a three-spring reverb might smooth the sound out a little. I notice, however, that the impedances on the 9 spring pans don't match those on the two-spring spring pans used in the twin (10 vs 8 for input; 2575 vs. 2250 for output). Is this a no-go, or is there a little impedance flexibility here?

Also, does anyone have any experience with the MOD brand tanks? They claim to make transducers closer to vintage accutronics specs, among other things.

Thanks.

Dan
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bill A. Moore


From:
Silver City, New Mexico, USA
Post  Posted 4 May 2012 6:55 am    
Reply with quote

I'm using a 3 spring (9 series) tank in my "Twin" clone. The reverb starts about 1 1/2 and is too much by 3! Tried a "Mod", 2 spring (4 series) tanks, and a "Belton" 3 spring tank, but I couldn't tell the difference.
The slight difference in impedance is not a problem.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Grafe


From:
Hudson River Valley NY
Post  Posted 4 May 2012 8:11 am    
Reply with quote

http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=181671&highlight=reverb+tank

Note that the "long-decay" tanks have a longer pre-delay, helping to separate the intial attack fromt eh reverb field a bit. I have both Type 9 and Type 4 long-decay tanks in verious amps and both sound fine, the Type 9 being a bit more dense (less choppy). Either way, I have recorded with them both and they both sound great.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Tim Marcus


From:
San Francisco, CA
Post  Posted 4 May 2012 10:08 am    
Reply with quote

Bill A. Moore wrote:
I'm using a 3 spring (9 series) tank in my "Twin" clone. The reverb starts about 1 1/2 and is too much by 3! Tried a "Mod", 2 spring (4 series) tanks, and a "Belton" 3 spring tank, but I couldn't tell the difference.
The slight difference in impedance is not a problem.


rip out the (unexciting in my opinion) LDR vibrato circuit and use the panel holes for dwell and tone controls - then you'll have the best reverb possible for steel guitar and I bet you don't use the tremolo much with steel anyway Very Happy
_________________
Milkmansound.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dan Beller-McKenna


From:
Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Post  Posted 4 May 2012 11:09 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks for all the comments, guys.

Interesting idea Tim, I might just try that! I haven;t used the tremolo on a twin since 1978, and then just for one song.

Dan
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bill A. Moore


From:
Silver City, New Mexico, USA
Post  Posted 4 May 2012 11:42 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks, Tim, when I do open it up again, I have a switched pot to take the "vibrato" out of the circuit.
I haven't decided to add a "dwell" control yet though.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron