| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic I Think I'm Ready For A Volume Pedal, But Which One?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  I Think I'm Ready For A Volume Pedal, But Which One?
Doug Burling

 

From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 10 Apr 2012 1:21 pm    
Reply with quote

I'm using a Sierra S8 through a Fender Princeton Reverb, but I'm considering a Nashville 112. Which volume pedal do you recommend?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Neer


From:
NJ
Post  Posted 10 Apr 2012 1:45 pm    
Reply with quote

I think the Goodrich pedal (120) is real nice, but the one I have needed a replacement pot not long after I bought it, which put it on my sh*t list. I did eventually replace the pot with one from Tom Bradshaw and it is very reliable and quiet now. I don't know if Goodrich ever straightened that issue out.
_________________
Links to streaming music, websites, YouTube: Links
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Brian Hunter


From:
Indianapolis
Post  Posted 10 Apr 2012 3:38 pm    
Reply with quote

Just dropped an envelope to Mr. Bradshaw into the mail myself today. My Goodrich was great. Bought it used too but the pot went. The new one should do the trick. I'd like to try a Hilton some day when I can afford it.
_________________
Brian
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dom Franco


From:
Beaverton, OR, 97007
Post  Posted 10 Apr 2012 4:19 pm    
Reply with quote

I have had many volume pedals over the years, all have worked ok.
My suggestion is to get the lowest profile pedal you can find/afford.

This is especially important if you will be standing. It is very hard to balance yourself with a tall pedal.

If playin with a lap steel, it can be tricky because your steel will be at an angle with one foot on a pedal...

I use a stand with my steel, so the pedal height is not too big a problem.

I used to use a morley (high profile) and when I wore my cowboy boots my leg wouldn't fit under my pedal steel!

Dom
_________________
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYG9cvwCPKuXpGofziPNieA/feed?activity_view=3
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fred Justice


From:
Mesa, Arizona
Post  Posted 10 Apr 2012 4:44 pm    
Reply with quote

Hilton / Free Shipping Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
_________________
Email: azpedalman@gmail.com
Phone: 480-235-8797
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ron Whitfield

 

From:
Kaaawa, Hawaii, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 2:44 am    
Reply with quote

Or, you could go the cheaper pinkie route and use the non-pedal volume knob...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mark Mansueto


From:
Michigan, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 2:56 am    
Reply with quote

I've never used a Goodrich so I'm wondering what makes this pedal better than others?
_________________
https://markmansueto.bandcamp.com/
https://open.spotify.com/artist/65dQ3EyZC2RaqawA8gPlRy?si=dOdqc5zxSKeJI9cISVVx_A
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Doug Burling

 

From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 4:43 am    
Reply with quote

Mike Neer wrote:
I think the Goodrich pedal (120) is real nice, but the one I have needed a replacement pot not long after I bought it, which put it on my sh*t list. I did eventually replace the pot with one from Tom Bradshaw and it is very reliable and quiet now. I don't know if Goodrich ever straightened that issue out.


Mike, Thanks for the recommendation. But if I've got this right, would I need to replace the original pot with one from Tom Bradshaw because the original pot is not quiet? Explain ""quiet". Is the original pot noisy?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Peter Darling

 

From:
United Kingdom
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 4:54 am     Goodrich swell pedals
Reply with quote

I think that that is a very fair question.
I used a Jim Dunlop high gain pedal without any problems. Now and again I experienced some weird noises from it and later discovered that I had not plugged in the jack lead properly. My fault! Anyway I was advised that Goodrich was the thing to have so I bought a very little used 120. I needed to manipulate this one more so than the Dunlop and found that the degree of movement needed was indeed adjustable.
They have had problems in the past with pot failure but if fitted with the new one million cycle pot then you should be OK.
They are built like an Abrams Tank and have a nice feel to them. By that I mean it's a big pedal and it's like the accelerator to a JCB or in American terms the biggest damned monster truck you can think of.
About the only thing that can go wrong with them IS the pot unless you accidentally run over it with your steam roller.
Conclusion????? In my opinion....A good well made pedal which is very strong structurally and works well but nothing to really write home to mum about. Rolling Eyes
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Doug Burling

 

From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 6:11 am    
Reply with quote

Ok! Now I'm really confused. I've been reading post/reviews here in the forum history. I'm reading about "Tone Sucking" of the passive volume pedals like the Goodrich. Then I read others saying they like the Goodrich passive pedals because of the tone. On the other hand I read how transparent and clean the Hilton sounds, but others say it sounds sterile. I understand that we all hear things differently. What I can say is the last thing I want is "Tone Sucking". "Transparent" sounds good to me. That is unless someone can explain why "Transparent" is not Good.

The other issue that kept coming up is the fact that the passive pedals use a long lasting battery instead of a power supply that needs to be plugged in. Who wouldn't want the battery over the power supply for convenience. That said, I certainly wouldn't sacrifice tone for convenience.

Can anyone give me the straight poop on all this? Maybe those who have had experience with the Goodrich and Hilton would give their Pros and Cons of each.

Thanks, Doug
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Brad Bechtel


From:
San Francisco, CA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 6:52 am    
Reply with quote

This belongs in Electronics, not Steel Without Pedals.

I own a Goodrich L10K volume pedal that I got when I bought my pedal steel. It worked really well, then started becoming scratchy about a year ago. I set it aside and went back to using my old Ernie Ball volume pedal.

When I went to the Texas Steel Guitar Jamboree, I stopped by the Goodrich booth and bought a new potentiometer. I asked plenty of questions and they showed me how easy it was to replace the old pot. When I got home I did just that. It took me less than a half hour all together once I found the proper sized Allen wrench.

I now use the Goodrich instead of the Ernie Ball. I find them both very usable, but the Goodrich seems smoother (in the sense of having the contrast between no volume and full volume).
_________________
Brad’s Page of Steel
A web site devoted to acoustic & electric lap steel guitars
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Tony Glassman


From:
The Great Northwest
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 6:54 am    
Reply with quote

If you want a pedal that does not color tone (cut highs) then they're only two answers. Neither is cheap nor do they use volume pots.

- Hilton

- Telonics
View user's profile Send private message
Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 7:07 am    
Reply with quote

Doug Burling wrote:
Ok! Now I'm really confused. I've been reading post/reviews here in the forum history. I'm reading about "Tone Sucking" of the passive volume pedals like the Goodrich. Then I read others saying they like the Goodrich passive pedals because of the tone. On the other hand I read how transparent and clean the Hilton sounds, but others say it sounds sterile. I understand that we all hear things differently. What I can say is the last thing I want is "Tone Sucking". "Transparent" sounds good to me. That is unless someone can explain why "Transparent" is not Good.

See http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=1924998#1924998 and other posts in that thread.

From listening to how steelers explain their experiences with passive VPs, I think many get the loading of the PU via VP to AMP badly balanced and thereby get unnecessary "tone suck". With the right balance of loads, "tone suck" caused by passive volume pedals is minimal.

Basically. Low-impedance PUs through high-ohm volume pedal into high-impedance amp-input, affect tone very little if at all. High-impedance (hot) PUs are much more sensitive to load-changes, so when a high-impedance PU is going through high-ohm volume pedals into low-impedance amp-input, high frequency tone gets affected as the player vary the load on the PU with/through the pot. With a low-ohm VP loading a high-impedance PU the "tone suck" is constantly too high.


Any form for high-impedance-input / low-impedance-out buffer-amp or "active" volume pedal (VP with built-in buffer-amp), make the load on the PU a constant high impedance and keep a low-impedance towards the amp-input, so tone doesn't change as the VP is operated. Also doesn't matter much what input-impedance an amp has, when there's a buffer or active volume pedal between it and the PU.

Whether one calls the sound from a constantly-high-impedance loaded (buffered) PickUp "transparent" or "sterile", depends mainly on where one comes from. I prefer "transparent" Smile


Doug Burling wrote:
The other issue that kept coming up is the fact that the passive pedals use a long lasting battery instead of a power supply that needs to be plugged in. Who wouldn't want the battery over the power supply for convenience. That said, I certainly wouldn't sacrifice tone for convenience.

Passive volume pedals do not use batteries or any form of power supply. "Passive" means it is "just" a volume potentiometer in a pedal.
The potentiometer must be replaced from time to time because it gets worn down by pedal-pushing or damaged by air-pollution - making it produce "scratch-noises" or uneven volume changes when operated.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Peter Darling

 

From:
United Kingdom
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 7:11 am     Volume pedals
Reply with quote

Yeah Brad I agree with you mate.
It is an electronic problem because the only thing that can make any difference to "tone sucking" etcetera IS the potentiometer . Personally I have had no problems with "tone suck" both with my Goodrich 120 or the Jim Dunlop. I have not experienced "tone suck" from either forms. I think we are able to proceed quite normally without having the horror of "tone suck" as a threat!
Stop worrying so much!
Pete
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lane Gray


From:
Topeka, KS
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 7:48 am    
Reply with quote

The thing that makes Goodrich better/more popular than the other passive pedals is the heavy-duty housing. I suspect it would survive anything the late Mr. Swayze did to a Timex.

As to Tone Suck, it's usually minimal, but noticeable. For lap steel, I would imagine that the on-board volume pot, being the same circuit, "pre-sucks" the tone, so a passive pedal would have minimal effect (conclusion based not on technical knowledge, just filtered through what I call my common sense, since the pickup already saw a load).

For pedal steel, like others said, there are lots of buffers out there that preserve the tone. My two favorites are the Lil Izzy and the EHX Holy Grail (only acts as a buffer when on).

Or you can avoid the phenomenon with the Hilton or Telonics.
_________________
2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Doug Burling

 

From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 7:49 am    
Reply with quote

Georg Sørtun wrote:
Doug Burling wrote:
Ok! Now I'm really confused. I've been reading post/reviews here in the forum history. I'm reading about "Tone Sucking" of the passive volume pedals like the Goodrich. Then I read others saying they like the Goodrich passive pedals because of the tone. On the other hand I read how transparent and clean the Hilton sounds, but others say it sounds sterile. I understand that we all hear things differently. What I can say is the last thing I want is "Tone Sucking". "Transparent" sounds good to me. That is unless someone can explain why "Transparent" is not Good.

See http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=1924998#1924998 and other posts in that thread.

From listening to how steelers explain their experiences with passive VPs, I think many get the loading of the PU via VP to AMP badly balanced and thereby get unnecessary "tone suck". With the right balance of loads, "tone suck" caused by passive volume pedals is minimal.

Basically. Low-impedance PUs through high-ohm volume pedal into high-impedance amp-input, affect tone very little if at all. High-impedance (hot) PUs are much more sensitive to load-changes, so when a high-impedance PU is going through high-ohm volume pedals into low-impedance amp-input, high frequency tone gets affected as the player vary the load on the PU with/through the pot. With a low-ohm VP loading a high-impedance PU the "tone suck" is constantly too high.


Any form for high-impedance-input / low-impedance-out buffer-amp or "active" volume pedal (VP with built-in buffer-amp), make the load on the PU a constant high impedance and keep a low-impedance towards the amp-input, so tone doesn't change as the VP is operated. Also doesn't matter much what input-impedance an amp has, when there's a buffer or active volume pedal between it and the PU.

Whether one calls the sound from a constantly-high-impedance loaded (buffered) PickUp "transparent" or "sterile", depends mainly on where one comes from. I prefer "transparent" Smile


Doug Burling wrote:
The other issue that kept coming up is the fact that the passive pedals use a long lasting battery instead of a power supply that needs to be plugged in. Who wouldn't want the battery over the power supply for convenience. That said, I certainly wouldn't sacrifice tone for convenience.

Passive volume pedals do not use batteries or any form of power supply. "Passive" means it is "just" a volume potentiometer in a pedal.
The potentiometer must be replaced from time to time because it gets worn down by pedal-pushing or damaged by air-pollution - making it produce "scratch-noises" or uneven volume changes when operated.


Georg, thank's for the information. Now that I've read it, I'm not sure I understand most of it. I'll be the first to admit I'm challenged in this area. Ohms, low impedance, high impedance etc is way over my head. My Sierra S8 has the George L10 and I'm going through a Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue. Do you think I'd be ok with this setup with the Goodrich or would I experience what some call "Tone Sucking"? I'm thinking about trying out a Peavey Nashville 112. Would the Nashville 112 work better?

Thanks, Doug
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Neer


From:
NJ
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 8:01 am    
Reply with quote

You will be just fine with the Goodrich.
_________________
Links to streaming music, websites, YouTube: Links
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Lane Gray


From:
Topeka, KS
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 8:05 am    
Reply with quote

Doug, the "Tone suck" is an interaction between pickup and volume pedal, the choice of amp won't affect it. Tone Suck is a slight rolloff of the highs and a certain change in the mids.
Rather than avoiding it, many choose to twist the knobs to find a tone they like.
Or buffers are out there that range from fifty bucks on up. I like my Lil' Izzy buffer, but I can play without it and get a real good tone.
_________________
2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
James Hartman

 

From:
Pennsylvania, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 8:40 am    
Reply with quote

Lane Gray wrote:
Doug, the "Tone suck" is an interaction between pickup and volume pedal, the choice of amp won't affect it. Tone Suck is a slight rolloff of the highs and a certain change in the mids.
Rather than avoiding it, many choose to twist the knobs to find a tone they like.
Or buffers are out there that range from fifty bucks on up. I like my Lil' Izzy buffer, but I can play without it and get a real good tone.


Here's some common sense. Concern about "tone suck" can easily get exaggerated beyond reason.

Some folks like buffered pedals, some don't - a subjective choice. Have to experiment and decide for yourself.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lane Gray


From:
Topeka, KS
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 8:55 am    
Reply with quote

Agreed. Tone Suck didn't bother all the lap steel stuff from the 30s on up, nor all the pedal steel recorded before the early 80s.
I suspect, rather than being an ACTUAL bother, Tone Suck is something on which folks dissatisfied with their tone can place the blame. But once the new wears off of the buffer or that Hilton pedal, or that Black Box, you still got your hands.
_________________
2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Georg Sørtun


From:
Mandal, Agder, Norway
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 9:20 am    
Reply with quote

Doug Burling wrote:
Now that I've read it, I'm not sure I understand most of it. I'll be the first to admit I'm challenged in this area.

Not too worry, most people are Smile
One problem with being professional (40+ years) in this area is that knowledge doesn't make it any easier to explain in "common language" to non-professionals ... sorry.

Doug Burling wrote:
Ohms, low impedance, high impedance etc is way over my head. My Sierra S8 has the George L10 and I'm going through a Fender Princeton Reverb Reissue. Do you think I'd be ok with this setup with the Goodrich or would I experience what some call "Tone Sucking"? I'm thinking about trying out a Peavey Nashville 112. Would the Nashville 112 work better?


You'll probably be fine with the Goodrich VP and the amp you got. The "high impedance" input on a NV-112 is actually not especially high-impedance, so it probably won't do much, if any, better when it comes to loading the PickUp through a Goodrich VP than the amplifier you have now.

"Tone-sucking" is not a very good description for what happens when we add variable load - a passive VP followed by amp-input load - in the sound-chain. As we vary the load of the PU-coil(s) we modify all the coil(s) characteristics, so "tone-sucking" in the higher frequencies is what people hear the most - not what actually happens.

My advice is to ignore the entire "tone sucking" issue, and adjust tone-controls to taste with the passive VP (Goodrich) in the sound-chain. For most players that will turn out to work/sound just fine - even if the PickUp doesn't get "mathematically ideally loaded".
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Doug Burling

 

From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 9:54 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks for all your input. The people on this forum are extremely helpful. I think "Tone Sucking" really got my attention and I maid it into more than it is. This really doesn't make any sense since so many people use and love the the Goodrich. Since I do most of my playing sitting, should I go with the L120 or the standard 120? Or maybe it really doesn't make any difference.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ransom Beers

 

Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 9:56 am    
Reply with quote

Just buy the Goodrich L120(low profile) & be done with it,you'll be happy you did.
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Griffith


From:
Taylor, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 2:15 pm    
Reply with quote

Doug Burling wrote:
Since I do most of my playing sitting, should I go with the L120 or the standard 120? Or maybe it really doesn't make any difference.



How tall are you/how much room under your guitar? If it is close, I'd go with the L-120.

I used a L-120 for years and once I discovered Mr. Bradshaw's Dunlop pot, it was great.

It looks like the "tone sucking" has been covered in detail, but I have to say this:
Telonics pedals give you the best of both worlds. I know they cost a little more, but they are worth every dime. If you can try one, do it!

Good luck in whatever you decide.
_________________
Emmons/Sho~Bud/Blanton, Fender/Peavey.
Telonics pedal
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rick Winfield


From:
Pickin' beneath the Palmettos
Post  Posted 11 Apr 2012 5:03 pm     Goodrich
Reply with quote

I'm with Mr. Neer on this one
Goodrich 120 and Tom Bradshaw pots.
Use my pedal every day for hours, and the Bradshaw pots can't be beat, IMHO
Also
a good used one, that's priced right, can often be found here on the forum
That's how I got mine, several years ago, and never had a problem.
Good luck whatever you decide
Rick
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron