| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Uncovering original fretboard on a Sho-Bud
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Uncovering original fretboard on a Sho-Bud
Eric Davidson


From:
Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2012 8:30 am    
Reply with quote

I just got my Sho-Bud last week and it has a black fretboard (vinyl I think) which the seller said he had placed over the original white fretboard. It looks as if it might be attached with some type of contact paper?

So my question is if I decided to take the black one off to expose the original one, would it most likely still be in tact or is it better to just leave on the current one on? I'm just wondering if the adhesive might have damaged the original one b/c I am unsure what it is made of. Thanks for any input!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Richard Sinkler


From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2012 2:37 pm    
Reply with quote

Seeing as how you don't know what adhesive was used, I wouldn't take the chance. You might end up screwing up the fretboard underneath. Of course, 'Bud fretboards are available if you need to remove both.

Then, someone here mentioned using an .011 string to slide under the fretboard to remove them. You could try this for maybe the first inch or so and see what happens to the lower fretboard. If it is screwing it up, you can just use some adhesive and glue the part you lifted back down.
_________________
Carter D10 8p/8k, Dekley S10 3p/4k C6 setup,Regal RD40 Dobro, Recording King Professional Dobro, NV400, NV112,Ibanez Gio guitar, Epiphone SG Special (open D slide guitar) . Playing for 54 years and still counting.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Billings


From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2012 3:39 pm    
Reply with quote

I'd try a hair dryer first. A heat gun, very, very, carefully if the hair dryer didn't work. A lot of fretboards are installed with two-sided tape. Worst comes to worst, use a string to remove both of them, and install a new one.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eric Davidson


From:
Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2012 4:14 pm    
Reply with quote

Im pretty sure it came from Tom Bradshaw if that is any indication of the type of adhesive used. It seems as if the one under the newer one is thicker so Im wondering what it may have been made of. I am told that the Bud is around a 74 model. Thanks!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2012 4:26 pm     What's underneath?
Reply with quote

Odds are fairly good that if someone put on a new fretboard, it was because the one underneath was pretty crappy. Neutral
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Tuttle


From:
Republic, MO 65738
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2012 8:00 pm    
Reply with quote

This was my guitar that I traded for an S-12 universal a few weeks ago. The white fretboard underneath came from John Coop and is made of aluminum. It was like new. I have no idea why another fretboard was put on over it unless someone liked the black ones better.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John Billings


From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 5:21 am    
Reply with quote

Stage light reflections can be pretty intense with the white fretboard. Perhaps that's why.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eric Davidson


From:
Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 7:14 am    
Reply with quote

Just tried the string method for about a half inch but sadly it peeled the white vinyl off of the aluminum. Can you get aluminum fretboards nowadays? This isn't a give deal but I had to see what was underneath. The seller did say in his initial emails that he did like the looks of the black one better.

So Bob, the bud I have was yours at one time? Wasn't sure if I read that correctly.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Tuttle


From:
Republic, MO 65738
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 9:21 am    
Reply with quote

Eric, I owned this guitar up until about a month ago when I traded it off. I played it for close to four years. It is a sweet little guitar and I would have kept it, but I decided to try the Universal tuning (again). It had a dustcatcher fretboard on it when I got it. I put the white fretboard on it. I know you'll enjoy the guitar. I sounds really great.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Herb Steiner

 

From:
Spicewood TX 78669
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 10:04 am    
Reply with quote

White fretboards look nice around the house. What happened to me onstage, however, is that the stage lights cast a string's shadow on the fretboard, making it very difficult to know if you're shooting for a string or a shadow.

That's my personal experience, though. Your mileage may vary.

Bob, I love your avatar photo! Smile
_________________
My rig: Infinity and Telonics.

Son, we live in a world with walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with steel guitars. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bob Tuttle


From:
Republic, MO 65738
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 11:13 am    
Reply with quote

Thanks Herb. Dad bought that new T-8 Custom for me for Christmas about 1953.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
chris ivey


From:
california (deceased)
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 11:25 am    
Reply with quote

so someone owned the steel for a couple weeks, 'improved' it (?) and sold it....

and people wonder why i'm not crazy about the buyer/sellers on the forum.
View user's profile Send private message
Eric Davidson


From:
Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 4:12 pm    
Reply with quote

Hi Bob,
I was sure the seller said he had it for a while, but maybe I misunderstood. It is a beautiful guitar and I will probably put a white one on eventually just because I like the look of it and Im sure I wont have to worry about glare from the stage lights for a while Very Happy

Do you know if the covering underneath is original? It seems like its velvet or something similar. Also, do you think 74 is a fair estimate of when it was made? Thanks Bob, I always enjoy finding out any history I can about my older instruments/amps (not that I really have that many).

Oh and that really is a neat photo above!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Billings


From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 4:16 pm    
Reply with quote

Pics of the underside, please.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Tuttle


From:
Republic, MO 65738
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 4:31 pm    
Reply with quote

The maroon flocking underneath was added when it was restored. Leon Roberts did a total restoration on it some years back. I'm not sure exactly when. He is a forum member and could probably give you all the details. As to the age, I would guess that it's older than '74 but don't know for sure.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Leon Roberts

 

From:
Tallahassee,FL USA
Post  Posted 29 Feb 2012 8:08 pm    
Reply with quote

Eric, I refurbished Your Pro-I for Ernie Cawby. It was truly a basket case when Ernie brought it to me. The flockig was used because I'm not a big fan of spatter paint that Sho-Bud used on the earlier guitars. The old rack and barrel system was replaced with triple raise/bouble lower changers with aluminum "uppers". The 14 hole pulling fingers allows perfect timing of pulls. My main guitar is an old professional the same color with the same under carriage and changers. Im my opinion the guitar you have is as good as a Sho-Bud can get. Enjoy, Leon
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eric Davidson


From:
Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 1 Mar 2012 3:14 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks for sharing that information Leon. It seems that many here on the forum have a lot of respect for you and your work and I am very pleased to own the Sho-Bud.

I had noticed that in just the right light I could see where there was a decal that had a name that I couldnt quite make out so its good to know who that is. Do you know when it was approximately that you re-finished it and do you have an opinion on when it may have been made? I was told that it may have been 74 but Bob Tuttle thought it may have been earlier. Thanks again for sharing the information.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Leon Roberts

 

From:
Tallahassee,FL USA
Post  Posted 1 Mar 2012 7:46 pm    
Reply with quote

Eric, I don't know exactly when your guitar was made. I'm sure Bob Tuttle could come closer to the date than me. I would think it's earlier than 1974 because of the rack & barrel under carriage and the single raise/single lower changers that it had originally. If you have any questions, email me at;
leonusn@comcast.net
I'll check back over my records and let you know when I done the work and refinish job.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Billings


From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 2 Mar 2012 2:24 am    
Reply with quote

With racks and barrels, the changers are not single-raise, single-lower. The changers "abilities" are determined by the number of racks and barrels operating on any given string.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Tuttle


From:
Republic, MO 65738
Post  Posted 2 Mar 2012 3:27 pm    
Reply with quote

The Sho-Bud "Professional" series, including the single neck, were made from 1970 to 1973. These were all round-front guitars with the rack and barrel pulling system. (That's what I read somewhere).
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John Billings


From:
Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 2 Mar 2012 3:46 pm    
Reply with quote

"The Sho-Bud "Professional" series, including the single neck, were made from 1970 to 1973."

Bob, that's correct, at least as far as the info I have. But the system started years earlier. Rick Abbott's is the earliest I've seen. Probably a '66. My '67 is next. I happen to love R&B guitars! You can do anything with them. Guys look at them and say, "Single_Raise, Single-Lower." Totally wrong! But timing pulls was a problem. This was eased a bit by the barrels behind two-puller guitars in '73 or so. I'd like to see James Morehead make cranks/pullers with about 5 holes.





View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Leon Roberts

 

From:
Tallahassee,FL USA
Post  Posted 6 Mar 2012 6:07 pm    
Reply with quote

John, The under carriage of the guitar is like the E-9th on this D-10.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eric Davidson


From:
Kentucky, USA
Post  Posted 6 Mar 2012 7:09 pm    
Reply with quote

oh and here is the underside of mine





View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron