Author |
Topic: How many of you read standard notation? |
Igor Fiksman
From: Georgia, USA
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 1:50 pm
|
|
Listening to some of Mike Perlowin's music got me wondering. How many of you read standard notation on PSG? I can read, even sight read some music for standard guitar, I can also glance at the fretboard and tell you in a hurry what note is on every fret on every string, but on PSG that seems like an insurmountable task. 10-12 strings plus all of the endless changes, it's a lot to process. Do pro's know exactly what notes are on say fret 21 with a pair of pedals down and a couple of levers engaged without thinking for a while or plucking the strings to identify by ear? _________________ SHO-BUD Professional SD-10 Black, SHO-BUD Pro III Custom D-10 Red, Goodrich Matchbox 6A, Steeler's Choice seat, Quilter Steelaire Amps. |
|
|
|
Ethan Shaw
From: Texas, USA
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 3:17 pm
|
|
I do that a lot. I use it to learn horn and organ transcriptions, and jazz standard heads. I always think of where the notes are relative to the root position (i.e. open or A&B pedals) I'm in. It's a lot of theory, but it's good for the brain! |
|
|
|
Don Brown, Sr.
From: New Jersey
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 4:24 pm
|
|
But, if you take your (2) F#'s (2) E's (2) G#'s & (2) B's away, how many strings does that leave, to learn open positions. I think 6 Since 8 + 2 = 10 - (4) = 6 different strings out of the 10 total. That is, if it's a 10 string steel.
And I believe everyone knows their changes whether drops or raises.
So all in all, it's about the same, 6 string with finger positions, or 10 strings with pedal positions.
Just my thoughts on it. |
|
|
|
David Mason
From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 4:46 pm
|
|
I do, but slowly. The idea of "sight-reading" on steel seems impossible, but if you can "sight-sing" it and you know where you're going to be on a steel to play a particular melody... well, I can see how it's supposed to work.
Earnest Bovine (Doug Livingston) is performing a few of Bach's Sonatas & Partitas for solo violin and I'm pretty sure he didn't lift them off an Earnest Tubbs record. I can read sort-of OK on standard guitar and I find that working on the exact same piece on guitar and steel reinforces the idea of playing music, not an instrument. There's a lovely little mandolin that sits in the corner and glares at me.
Because of the history of steel guitar, most players aren't expected to read, and "head" arrangements are still the norm - but reading can't hurt. There's another thread about the non-country steel, and it's my opinion that people are sometimes calling for atmospheric steel instead of the synthesizer. Keyboard players most certainly can read, and if you want to take their jobs away, well.... And when people say it's somehow impossible because "it can play the same note five different ways!" Ummm, in every case, play it the easiest way possible. You only need ONE of 'em, isn't it nice to have spares. |
|
|
|
Igor Fiksman
From: Georgia, USA
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 6:06 pm
|
|
I guess on the flipside of this coin, are there pieces of music composed specificaly for pedal steel and written in traditional chart format? If so, do composers understand the chordal possibilities or are these mostly single or two note lines as for violins or individual horns. "Concerto for E9 pedal steel guitar and orchestra" has a certain ring to it. _________________ SHO-BUD Professional SD-10 Black, SHO-BUD Pro III Custom D-10 Red, Goodrich Matchbox 6A, Steeler's Choice seat, Quilter Steelaire Amps. |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 7:56 pm
|
|
Reading is fundamental. I can read fake book parts, single note lines with chord names above them. I'm not real great at it, but I generally have it right by the 3rd or 4th time through.
Let's see how long this topic can last without quoting Chet Atkins. _________________ -πππ- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Billy Tonnesen
From: R.I.P., Buena Park, California
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 9:47 pm
|
|
Bob:
Wasn't Chet the one when asked if he could read music, replied: "Not Enough To Hurt My Playing" ! |
|
|
|
Mike Perlowin
From: Los Angeles CA
|
Posted 10 Jul 2011 11:23 pm
|
|
Iβve mentioned this several times before, but for those who donβt already know, Iβve written an article an how to read music on the E9 neck, which I will send for free to anybody who requests it. (Please send requests via E-mail and not a private message.)
My system is not easy, and requires a lot of study and memorization, but it does work. Nothing about the steel is easy, including reading music. But it's not impossible. It can be done, and my article shows you how to do it. _________________ Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin |
|
|
|
Mike Delaney
From: Fort Madison, IA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 12:43 am
|
|
I agree with b0b-reading is fundamental, if for no other reason than a form of communication.
Steel isn't my primary axe, rather something I do for fun. To sight read on it would be a bit difficult, but probably because I haven't done it often. I find myself hearing the music in my head after looking the chart over, then adapting it to the steel. Sort of a quick memorization.
Great idea to learn the rudiments of reading though, makes it much easier to study theory, etc.
Mike |
|
|
|
Dickie Whitley
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 2:17 am
|
|
I agree with b0b and I learned using Mike Perlowin's book and supplement. I can't do it fast or read without pausing, but I get the job done in my own time. I think it a great ability to have and would highly suggest learning to do so. My 2 cents FWIW. |
|
|
|
Mike Perlowin
From: Los Angeles CA
|
|
|
|
John De Maille
From: On a Mountain in Upstate Halcottsville, N.Y.
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 5:14 am
|
|
Unfortunately, I never took reading and learning music, seriously, when I was young. Funny, because I've played music almost all of my life. I even supplemented my income for over 20 yrs doing it. Now, at age 62, I wish I had done so, but, a form of dyslexia has set in and trying to comprehend it is a daunting task. I even have trouble some times with "tab", but, never with chord charts. I've been lucky to a point, though. If I can hear it, I can play it, usually. I envy people, who, can read music and apply it to their instrument. I wish I had never been so stupid, when, I was younger. |
|
|
|
Jim Cohen
From: Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 5:58 am
|
|
Yeah, me too, John. I remember my very first pedal steel lesson, with Scotty, back in about 1971. He asked me, right at the beginning, "Do you want to learn to play from standard notation, or from tab? Tab will get you going faster, but standard notation will take you farther." He was right to present it to me that way, but being about 19 years old and eager to sound like Rusty Young as soon as possible, I wanted to get started FAST, so I picked tab.
p.s. Yeah, I can read tab but not enough to hurt my playing... _________________ www.JimCohen.com
www.RonstadtRevue.com
www.BeatsWalkin.com |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 7:05 am
|
|
b0b wrote: |
Let's see how long this topic can last without quoting Chet Atkins. |
I knew it wouldn't take long. You know how to deflate a steel guitarist's ego? Put sheet music in front of him.
Seriously, just yesterday I had an urge to learn the jazz standard "Lover" because I remembered Noel Boggs playing it. I found it in a fake book and worked on it for about half an hour, trying various chord positions and phrasings. If I had tried to learn it from Boggs' record, it would have taken just as long and it wouldn't have been correct.
Reading is the best way to learn jazz era standards. _________________ -πππ- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Erv Niehaus
From: Litchfield, MN, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 7:42 am
|
|
When I write tab, I always include the notation.
This way, after a while, you can see the relationship between the notation and what you are playing.
As has been stated above, playing the pedal steel off of standard notation is quite difficult because of all the different locations for the various chords.
When I play non-pedal steel, I can play off of standard notation. |
|
|
|
Steve Gorman
From: Gilroy California
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 12:23 pm
|
|
Pardon me for this, but sightreading notation for pedal steel guitar seems impossibly difficult, and definitely the hard way to go about it.
With all the different tunings, pedal and knee changes, bar slants, etc. it just seems ridiculous to me to ignore TAB. I agree with Igor's original statement there.
Reading music for guitar, mandolin, piano, etc is highly recommended and those who take the time and effort to learn how are glad they did, myself included. (sorry Chet) But I have not tried making the stretch to learn notation for the pedal steel guitar - just doesn't seem worth it. |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 12:50 pm
|
|
Guitar music often has "hints" to tell which string to use. I mark up sheet music with "hints" for the fret number and sometimes the pedal letter names. So above the staff you might see 6AF for example if that's the position that I like for a chord or phrase.
One problem with tab is that it's too big. I can write twice as much music in the same space with standard notation, and convey timing information too. _________________ -πππ- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Bob Simons
From: Kansas City, Mo, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 1:02 pm
|
|
I can sight read piano and guitar, but Pedal Steel takes too much strategy for me...
The most useful transcriptions I've found are those in Scotty's book that include tab and notation. I find tab frustrating and lacking too much information. With the assistance of standard notation I can quickly understand the chordal movement, phrasing and timing. _________________ Zumsteel U12 8-5, MSA M3 U12 9-7, MSA SS 10-string, 1930 National Resonophonic, Telonics Combo, Webb 614e, Fender Steel King, Mesa Boogie T-Verb. |
|
|
|
David Mason
From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 1:59 pm
|
|
What b0b said (not what Bob said): if you want to play the best music of your or any other era, it's all there on paper - not tab. And it doesn't tell you which fret or string, but you only need to get the melody under your fingers once, and then you can start to figure other ways to play it. "The Classical Fake Book V.2" is a big favorite of mine, and no, no orchestra is knocking on my door - but I never thought pedal steel was exactly a road to riches, anyway. And reading music is just like any other reading, if you take the time to rewrite it yourself, a melody with all the position notes you can muster, placed under the chords as you see 'em - you'll remember it much, much better. |
|
|
|
Mike Perlowin
From: Los Angeles CA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 3:00 pm
|
|
Steve Gorman wrote: |
Pardon me for this, but sightreading notation for pedal steel guitar seems impossibly difficult... |
EVERYTHING is difficult of you don't know how to do it. I can show you how, and I'm offering this information for free.
Quote: |
I have not tried making the stretch to learn notation for the pedal steel guitar - just doesn't seem worth it. |
It IS worth it! There are tens of thousands of songs that are appropriate for steel guitar instrumentals that have never been tabbed out. This year, at the Phoenix show, my set included Frankie Avalon's "Venus," "Old Man River," "Unchained Melody," a classical piece by Claude Debussy called "Reverie," and the theme from the film Black Orpheus: "Manha de Carnival." (One of those tunes everybody has heard a million times but doesn't know it's name.)
As far as I know, none of these tunes has ever been tabbed out, but all are available in sheet music.
Moreover, conventional notation is an international written language that has been around for over 400 years. It is the standard by which millions of musicians all over the world communicate with each other. To not learn how to read it is to isolate oneself from the rest of the world.
I've previously mentioned that I've been told that the pedal steel guitar isn't a real instrument, but more of a musical toy, more or less on the same level as a kazoo. I have no insight into the mind of the person who said that (a violinist,) but I bet the fact that so few steel players read music, in some way influenced her thinking. _________________ Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin |
|
|
|
Steve Gorman
From: Gilroy California
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 7:13 pm
|
|
Mike, there are a couple of points I would like to try to clarify:
I did not say that reading music isn't important, I believe, as you do, that it is the international standard written language of music. Like most on this list, I am a multi instrumentalist, my instruments being guitar, mandolin, bass, pedal steel, and a little piano. I do read music, quite a bit, my library is full of music books. The ability to read has opened so many musical doors for me, I don't need convincing of the value of reading.
That said, I also agree that there are bazillions of great tunes out there to be learned and arranged for pedal steel. This is something I sometimes enjoy doing, my usual method is to get a recorded version, (YouTube is a favorite way) figure out the chords and melody. I have used fake books to get chord progressions and tricky melody parts, but to me this is not really reading music. Sometimes I will work things out on another instrument and then apply it to the steel. For me anyway, this is so much easier and more effective than trying to apply the written notes to the pedal steel guitar.
I've heard some of your tracks and read your posts here, and I think what you are doing with classical music and steel guitar is fantastic. You are taking the steel in a direction that few have done, and it is good for the future of the instrument. And I don't know of a better way to work with the classics, than by reading the notes.
RE; your violinist friend, who does not respect the steel guitar - I have encountered that also, not only with steel but also with six string guitar. That is closed minded snobbery, an inability to understand or appreciate the complexity and beauty of this instrument we play. |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 7:58 pm
|
|
Steve: if you can read music on other instruments, then I imagine that your main problem is that you don't know where the notes are on your steel guitar. Reading music while playing steel is no different from reading while playing other instruments, once you know where the notes are. _________________ -πππ- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Mike Perlowin
From: Los Angeles CA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 8:10 pm
|
|
Steve, I'm glad you see the value in learning how to read music. Unfortunately, there are many players who don't, and who actively resist the idea.
Frankly, I fail to understand why any musician, regardless of what instrument they play, would not want to learn how. It's not like learning how to read will make you forget how to play by ear.
Reading on the steel, using the pedals, is challenging. But it can be done, and my article shows you how. And again, I'm giving it away for free.
Anybody who wants it, just send me an E-mail, and I'll send you the file. _________________ Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin |
|
|
|
Jim Cohen
From: Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 8:11 pm
|
|
b0b wrote: |
Reading music while playing steel is no different from reading while playing other instruments, once you know where the notes are. |
I beg to differ, b0b. How many C's one octave above middle C exists on a piano? ONE! How many on a pedal steel? You do the math. If the music calls for this note on a piano, there's only one place to get it; you only have to decide which finger to hit it with. If you're playing steel, you have to decide: which string do you want to use (on a C6 neck, you'll have 8 different strings where middle C is possible). THEN you still have to decide whether you want to play it with any pedals or KLs engaged, which will alter what fret you get your C on. And your choices will depend upon the rest of the line that this note occurs in; you might play it one way going up the line and another way coming back down the line, etc. Reading on pedal steel is WAY more complicated than doing it on most other instruments.
(Ah, but you knew that...) _________________ www.JimCohen.com
www.RonstadtRevue.com
www.BeatsWalkin.com |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 11 Jul 2011 8:17 pm
|
|
It's no different from other fretted instruments, Jim. On guitar, you have to decide which string to play C on, and which finger to play it with. If you can read music on guitar (which is the instrument I learned on), reading for steel isn't such a stretch.
Sometimes I think steel players are looking for excuses not to read. Oh, it's so complicated! It's too hard! Sorry, I don't buy it.
If a song's in Bb, start at the 6th fret. If it's going higher or lower than what you have there, go up or down a position. This isn't rocket science. It's just notes on a page. _________________ -πππ- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|