Author |
Topic: Setting the record straight!! |
C Dixon
From: Duluth, GA USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 9:14 am
|
|
I got a disturbing private message this morning. And guess what? In NO way was I disturbed at the sender. Rather, I became disturbed at myself for causing a false perception. And I am grateful the sender wrote it, so I could do the following:
So lest their be any doubt, I want to "Set the record straight".
I will begin with stating unequivocally that I LOVE the sound (amongst other things) of Emmons PSG's. I always have, since before I ever bought my first P/P in '69, and then my late '80's Lashley LeGrande in, of couse, the late '80's.
IMO, the Emmons' P/P has THE sound my brain wants to hear, BAR NONE! I consider it the greatest sound to have EVER come out of an amplifier. Bar none! Remember, that is my opinion. (note: not all Emmons' P/P's have that sound. Sadly, mine didn't)
Second to the P/P's sound, would have to be the LeGrandes IMO. I would play a LeGrande today, however, in ALL cases in lieu of the Emmons' P/P , because I do NOT like the mechanics of the P/P. I hated it in '69 (because of that) the day I got mine, and the happiest day in my life was when I sold it.
And the reason I sold it was because I believe its mechanics can NOT deliver what most want. There WILL be much vehement debate about this. So flame on, but I am sticking to my feeling about it.
Thus, I was thrilled beyond words the day I received my first LeGrande, because ALL of the things I abhored about my P/P were absent. Albeit; it did not have as good a sound as MOST P/P's. But I just loved the LeGrande's pedals and Knee levers because they were velvety smooth. I could not believe what a change for the better. Particularly on the "C" neck.
So make NO mistake about it, I love Emmons' PSG's, in spite of my not liking the mechanical limitations of the P/P.
The reason I no longer own either one though, has NOTHING to do with ANY of the above. And this is the record I want to set straight.
THE reason I bought an Excel; and the reason I have ordered a second one; and the reason I sold my LeGrande; is because the Excel is the ONLY PSG in the world (that I know of) that can deliver what I want in a PSG.
I went twice to most of the more prominent PSG manufacturers over an 8yr period, to see if they could do what the Excel will do, and in EVERY case they could not.
I, in no way, hold this against them. I do NOT blame them for not wanting to build a one of a kind PSG for a "nut"! And I still love and admire all of them. And more than one of them are my personal friends.
But Mitsuo somehow built it saying only repeatedly, "I can do it". And he is doing it again, only this time it is even more WAY out!
So let there be no doubt. MY absolute top desire (when it comes to sound) IS an Emmons' P/P. NO other guitar ever made can come close to it IMO. The LeGrande is second in that scenario. I stand on that. Again it is my opinion.
But sound is not the only criteria in my case. Thus I had to settle for less sound to get all of the other things I wanted.
And I can live with that. This is one of the times in life, when I can NOT have the best of both worlds.
If Emmons built a 12 string Lashley LeGrand III PSG, that could do all that an Excel could do easily, I would order one yesterday.
If you are interested in what I mean, click on the following link, (scroll down to my post) and study the 7 copedents that my new Excel is capable of doing easily and instantly. (and gunna do when I add my "thingies" after I get it home from St.Louis.).
http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=138275
I hope this truly sets the record straight. And may Jesus bless you for understanding.
c. _________________ A broken heart + † = a new heart. |
|
|
|
Bill Dobkins
From: Rolla Missouri, USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 9:41 am
|
|
C, anyone who can't appreciate your opinion can go stick thier head in the sand. You have that right as does everyone. To me the P/P is for the young who have strong legs. I'll take a all pull anytime, especially if sounds like the Emmons or even close.
Some people spend more time trying to find that Emmons P/P sound than they do learning how to play.
Just get a good Steel and play the damn thing.
They all sound good if thier played right. IMHO of course....BD _________________ Custom Rittenberry SD10
Boss Katana 100 Amp
Positive Grid Spark amp
BJS Bars
Z~Legend Pro,Custom Tele
Honor our Vet's.
Now pass the gravy. |
|
|
|
Dick Wood
From: Springtown Texas, USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 10:14 am
|
|
I couldn't agree with you more Carl because everything you stated is why I have never owned an Emmons although I love the sound but to each his own I guess. |
|
|
|
richard burton
From: Britain
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 12:33 pm
|
|
For me, tone is king.
I would never sacrifice tone just because the mechanics of a steel made it physically easier to play. |
|
|
|
Bill Hatcher
From: Atlanta Ga. USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 1:14 pm Re: Setting the record straight!!
|
|
C Dixon wrote: |
IMO, the Emmons' P/P has THE sound my brain wants to hear, BAR NONE! I consider it the greatest sound to have EVER come out of an amplifier. Bar none!
THE reason I bought an Excel; and the reason I have ordered a second one; and the reason I sold my LeGrande; is because the Excel is the ONLY PSG in the world (that I know of) that can deliver what I want in a PSG.
c. |
Carl. Are you saying that the Excel can deliver BOTH the mechanics you want AND the sound of the PP Emmons which you say is the "greatest sound", or are you saying that you have to trade off the sound you want to hear for the mechanics of the Excel. |
|
|
|
John McGuire
From: Swansea,Illinois, USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 1:17 pm
|
|
You know , everyone is entitled to their opinion. I had a Legrande 1st, and I love the tone, I thought it sounded like a push/pull. Then I got a push/pull, still have the Legrande, side by side no comparison.
Push/ pull all the way for sound.
The feel of the pedals and knees,They are both smooth and easy. Maybe the push/pull is set up right.
I play a standard Emmons setup 8&5 and both guitars are set this way. I have no plans to change my setup so I feel I don't have an issue with the mechanics of a p/p. I know it stays in tune better than the Legrande, which stays in tune quite well. I have not touched a tuning screw after 5 gigs. The bottom line is in a free country, you can like and play whatever you want.If someone don't like your opinion Carl they should go out in the woods and drill for oil. |
|
|
|
C Dixon
From: Duluth, GA USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 1:29 pm
|
|
Quote: |
Carl. Are you saying that the Excel can deliver BOTH the mechanics you want AND the sound of the PP Emmons which you say is the "greatest sound", or are you saying that you have to trade off the sound you want to hear for the mechanics of the Excel. |
Oh no Bill.
I should have typed, everything BUT sound.
NO way does an Excel sound like an Emmons. Be it P/P or ALL/Pull.
thanks for pointing that out. Again I write things that are perceived in a way I did not mean it. Do ya suppose that is a sign of age, Or I should just hang it up?
Luv ya dear friend,
c. _________________ A broken heart + † = a new heart. |
|
|
|
Bill Hatcher
From: Atlanta Ga. USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 3:24 pm
|
|
[quote=" C Dixon "NO way does an Excel sound like an Emmons. Be it P/P or ALL/Pull."
Carl.
I understand that now thank you, so how do you perceive the sound of the Excel then, knowing that you feel that the Emmons PP has what you describe as the greatest tone. Do you just accept the tone it has in comparison to the Emmons?
I have had to do just that in my electric bass playing. I used to have a 1962 Jazz Bass that I played through a nice set up. To me it was a great tone, but I needed to physically move on to another instrument that Fender was not able to supply to accomodate where I was growing to musically. I had to actually build it myself. It fit all my technical needs perfectly, but I never was able to get the sound that I had in the Fender. I just had to find some new tones that IT had and then build from that. |
|
|
|
C Dixon
From: Duluth, GA USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 3:48 pm
|
|
Quote: |
I understand that now thank you, so how do you perceive the sound of the Excel then, knowing that you feel that the Emmons PP has what you describe as the greatest tone. Do you just accept the tone it has in comparison to the Emmons? |
Well, describing specific sounds is very subjective, but....
The following may help:
When I bought my first Excel, the last thing I was thinking of was sound. Rather I had it built to allow me experiment with something I had designed, called electronic "switchovers" that would switch given pedals and/or knee levers so they would perform different functions instantly on demand
You can easily see this setup, if you click on the link I posted in my last post, and you study the last 6 copedents.
Since this was and is my 45 year old dream, ALL of my focus was on that. So when Mitsuo asked what PU I wanted, I said, "Put whatever you wish".
To this day that PU has not been changed. Ironically it is going to be changed before the end of this week. The gentleman who bought the Excel had Jerry Roller ship me a new TT and I can't wait to try it out.
To answer your question more succinctly, the sound is not what I have in my brain. But then NO other guitar I know has it either. Interestingly Buddy said this about his Sierra after going back to his Emmons'.
"I have a sound in my head that the Sierra could not give." or words to that affect.
I am in the same situation. I played the Excel every day (more or less) for 10 yrs, and I enjoyed playing it because it fulfilled everything I had bought it for. There are a number of things I like so well about it, that I could not ever again be happy with any other guitar I have seen.
I would call the sound "brilliantly brite". Not sure that conveys how it sounds, but it is the best I can describe it.
Having said that, it has VERY good bass response. I loved that. The highs do not cut through of course, as they do on an Emmons.
I can't wait to see how this TT is going to change the sound. Because if it makes a measurable difference, I am going to have Jerry ship one just like it to Japan, so Mitsuo can install it on my new Excel before he ships it to St. Louis for the show (for me to pick up). Note: I did tell Mitsuo when I ordered the guitar, to put a humbucking PU in there with adjustable pole pieces. Which he did.
Thanks for asking Bill,
carl _________________ A broken heart + † = a new heart. |
|
|
|
Bill Hatcher
From: Atlanta Ga. USA
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 3:56 pm
|
|
My pleasure Carl.
Since you say the guitar is very "brite" sounding with a humbucker in it. I would almost think that the single coil TT pickup would accentuate that brightness even more unless it is wound up with so much impedence that the highs are clipped a bit.
Please post what your findings are when you install the TT in the Excel. |
|
|
|
chris ivey
From: california (deceased)
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 5:06 pm
|
|
carl...nobody has to explain why they don't necessarily go along with the herd of sheep! you found a steel that does and 'is' what you want. that makes it more special than anything else. and when you own a special instrument, you can make beautiful music!! |
|
|
|
Michael Douchette
From: Gallatin, TN (deceased)
|
Posted 22 Jul 2008 9:28 pm
|
|
Carl, I don't know you, nor do I know who would give you a hard time. You play what YOU want, for the reasons YOU want. You don't owe an explanation to anybody.
(Personally, I prefer the Sho-Bud tone over the P/P. Just my preference. Anybody wanna be a wiseacre and call me names for it? I didn't think so!) _________________ Mikey D... H.S.P.
Music hath the charm to soothe a savage beast, but I'd try a 10mm first.
http://www.steelharp.com
http://www.thesessionplayers.com/douchette.html
(other things you can ask about here)
http://s117.photobucket.com/albums/o54/Steelharp/ |
|
|
|
C Dixon
From: Duluth, GA USA
|
Posted 23 Jul 2008 6:05 am
|
|
Quote: |
Since you say the guitar is very "brite" sounding with a humbucker in it. I would almost think that the single coil TT pickup would accentuate that brightness even more unless it is wound up with so much impedence that the highs are clipped a bit. |
Bill, the origianl Excel (the one I just sold on the forum) has a single coil PU. The one I was referring to was the new one that I had Mitsuo put a humbucker in.
Quote: |
Please post what your findings are when you install the TT in the Excel. |
I will surely do that, hopefully by the end of this week.
Thanks for asking friend.
Thanks also to all who have expressed encouraging words. Means a lot.
c. _________________ A broken heart + † = a new heart. |
|
|
|
Scott Swartz
From: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted 23 Jul 2008 6:22 am
|
|
Carl,
You have posted so much good info over the years, I would like to suggest something that might help you for the bright issue.
Nothing top secret but maybe you haven't tried it....
In a lot of cases, the resistive and/or capacitive load in parallel across the pickup is not optimized on steel guitars due to the mixing and matching of pickups, volume pedals, buffers and the order they are hooked up.
This can result in a big peak at the resonant frequency of the pickup, that amp tone controls will never dial out, they are not selective enough in most cases.
The Sarno black box builds in control of this load, but you can also change it by different pot value in a passive VP, solder a pot or resistor across the jack on the steel, changing a component in your buffer or active VP, etc. _________________ Scott Swartz
Steeltronics - Steel Guitar Pickups
www.steeltronics.com |
|
|
|
C Dixon
From: Duluth, GA USA
|
Posted 24 Jul 2008 9:59 am
|
|
Bill Hatcher wrote:
Quote: |
Please post what your findings are when you install the TT in the Excel. |
Ok, last night I stayed up late and installed the new TT PU in my Excel. And the improvement in sound is enough that I am glad the buyer bought it and had me install it.
In a word:
1. The highs are louder and much clearer now.
2. The mids are somewhat better.
3. The bass resonse I can tell no difference.
So, I am pleased. And I trust that the new owner will be too.
Thanks for your interest Bill.
Scott Swartz wrote:
Quote: |
In a lot of cases, the resistive and/or capacitive load in parallel across the pickup is not optimized on steel guitars due to the mixing and matching of pickups, volume pedals, buffers and the order they are hooked up.
This can result in a big peak at the resonant frequency of the pickup, that amp tone controls will never dial out, they are not selective enough in most cases.
The Sarno black box builds in control of this load, but you can also change it by different pot value in a passive VP, solder a pot or resistor across the jack on the steel, changing a component in your buffer or active VP, etc. |
Thank you Scott,
I am aware of these suggestions and findings. Thanks for suggesting them to me, anyway dear friend.
Having spent 40 yrs in a career of pure electronics and electro-mechanical devices, I have had the honor and sheer pleasure of experiencing and being involved in many facets of the technical advances in electricity from a very primitive Dr De Forest and his "triode" vacuum tube invention, to much of what exists today.
I praise Jesus for this. For as I have told my wife many times, MOST of what we take for granted did NOT exist the day we were born. IE, we have witnessed a technological explosion unprecedented in ANY other 70 yr era in the history of the universe. For this I am humbled and grateful to my precious Savior Jesus Christ.
Thanks again Scott for posting that. May Jesus bless you all always,
carl. _________________ A broken heart + † = a new heart. |
|
|
|
Al Vescovo
From: Van Nuys, CA, USA * R.I.P.
|
Posted 24 Jul 2008 10:36 am Excel
|
|
I just know the 14str. Excel, Mitsuo built for me is the best steel guitar I've ever owned. Over the years I,ve had Gibson,National,Fender,Emmons,Mci and Multi-Kord. Mitsuo in my humble opnion builds the best. AV |
|
|
|
Tracy Sheehan
From: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
|
Posted 24 Jul 2008 11:11 am Tone.
|
|
I have always wondered about this and have commented on it before.I wonder if tone is in the amp and what your ears hear?I have listened to Curly Chalkers playing since he played on Hank Thompsons Wild side of Life back in the early 50s.
He always had the same great tone on any brand of steel steel he played.
He could have got that same tone out of an electrified 2/4.IMHO |
|
|
|
Michael Johnstone
From: Sylmar,Ca. USA
|
Posted 24 Jul 2008 12:20 pm
|
|
All the things Carl says about the mechanical capabilities of Mitsuo's guitars are true and then some. I've been playing one for about 5 years now and I can't imagine a better engineered guitar. The only thing the Excel does not have and should have is quick-change pickups altho Mitsuo told me he is thinking about adding that feature. So when I change pickups they tend to stay on a while. I've tried em all and these days I vascillate between a 17.5 TT and a Tonealigner humbucker strictly for hum reasons. With the TT,the Excel Superb sounds to me like a Kline w/a stock single coil - which is to say "Emmonsy" and with the humbucker it's right up there with any other good modern humbucker equipped Nashville toned guitars - Zum,LeGrande,Franklin,Carter,Mullen,Fessy,etc.
My criteria in selecting a pedal steel definately includes mechanical design and tone at a ratio of around 50-50 because with all the pickups available and the tonal palette of modern steel amps,much is possible to alter the tone of an instrument. In short it's easier to make a good sounding guitar sound great than it is to make a 'taters 'n gravy engineered guitar do a lot more than it was designed to do. In the case of the Excel Superb guitar however,no such compromises are necessary - it's just variations on greatness in any respect you want to talk about.
PP Emmons sound great but they're engineered like old Harleys whereas Excels sound equally great and are engineered like new Ducatis. So take your pick. |
|
|
|