| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Best Replacement speakers for a 1969 Fender Super Reverb
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Best Replacement speakers for a 1969 Fender Super Reverb
Lefty


From:
Grayson, Ga.
Post  Posted 1 Mar 2008 5:56 am    
Reply with quote

This amplifier has the original speakers that sound good, but when I push it with a pedal I worry that I will blow one of them. I have the Jensen reissues in my 68 Super. They sound good when pushed, but lack the sweet tone at normal volume. Weber makes several models that are suppose to be good.
Please offers some opinions on replacements. I am looking for as good a clean Fender tone as possible.
thanks,
Lefty
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jay Ganz


From:
Out Behind The Barn
Post  Posted 1 Mar 2008 6:24 am    
Reply with quote

Which reissues are you using now...the C10R's (ceramic)or P10R's (alnico)?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Lefty


From:
Grayson, Ga.
Post  Posted 1 Mar 2008 10:27 am    
Reply with quote

The 68 has the P10R reissue Jensens (Italian made, I believe).
Lefty
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jim Sliff


From:
Lawndale California, USA
Post  Posted 2 Mar 2008 8:14 am    
Reply with quote

The Jensen "reissues" are neither "Jensen" nor "reissues".

An Italian company bought the name and trademarks. They did NOT buy the designs or specs. A "reissue" P10Q is NOT the same speaker as a vintage P10Q except in name.

I've found every single Jensen "reissue" to be harsh and strangled sounding. They *can* be broken in, but it takes a long time of playing them at medium volume and a knowledge of how to remove the "dope" that's applied to reinforce the cone. I have one pair of 10's that sound good, but I spent months working on them - ridiculous for most players.

Just call Ted Weber, tell him what your guitar/effects setup is and what type of sound you are looking for. He will recommend the right ones based on your budget, and with a Super sometimes it's even a mixed-pair set.

Use the Jensens for paperweights.

Barring that, you can look at various Eminence designs - but a phone call will be worth your time, and he never "oversells" anyone.

Last - IF you can find a quad of CTS ceramic 10's from the 70's you might really like them if you're not going for squeaky-clean sounds. The mid 70's CTS 10's and 12's are some of my favorite speakers. I serviced a Deluxe Reverb for a guy that had a CTS 12 in it and it was probably THE best DR I've ever heard - BF, SF, whatever.
_________________
No chops, but great tone
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lefty


From:
Grayson, Ga.
Post  Posted 3 Oct 2011 8:31 am    
Reply with quote

Well I am working on a 1964 Super reverb and debating on the speakers. I am considering the Weber California paper cone (2) and the 10F125 (2).
The Cali is rated at 60 watts and the 10F125 at 30 watts. Does anyone have experience with a similiar setup? I am looking for clean country with headroom and warmness (arn't we all?).
thanks.
Lefty
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave LaSalle

 

From:
Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 3 Oct 2011 8:34 am    
Reply with quote

Speakers should be ok. Maby the caps. Just spitt ballin'
_________________
Politics:Just vote .79' Sho-Bud "Super Pro"Webb,Fender Steel King,
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rich Hlaves


From:
Wildomar, California, USA
Post  Posted 3 Oct 2011 2:57 pm    
Reply with quote

Lefty,

Ceramic magnets should give you less compression at higher volumes hence more clean headroom.

In the case of two BF supers I owned to AB the alnicos vs. ceramics would start to hair up about 4 1/2 on the dial and I stayed clean to about 6 with the ceramics. Ear splitting loud at that point.

I was using the #2 input with my Emmons so the PU wouldn't overdrive the front end of the SR.
_________________
On man....let the smoke out of another one.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tim Marcus


From:
San Francisco, CA
Post  Posted 3 Oct 2011 8:29 pm    
Reply with quote

If you're concerned you can take the original speakers out and store them. Get new speakers and put the old ones in their boxes. Store them somewhere that is not going to be excessively moist.

I really really can't say enough good things about the Jupiter ceramic speakers:

http://jupitercondenser.com/Guitar-Speakers/guitar-speakers.html

they are built to the original Jensen spec, and blow everything I have heard out of the water. Plus Chris is an excellent guy - you can trust him with your tone!
_________________
Milkmansound.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dan Tyack

 

From:
Olympia, WA USA
Post  Posted 4 Oct 2011 12:05 pm    
Reply with quote

I agree with the mixed set idea. In my experience mixing different sounding speakers can give a bigger, more dimensional sound.

My friend Andy Marshall at THD amps built the first 'beautique' 59' Bassman type amp a couple of decades ago. In the process he had dozens of late 50s Bassmans in his shop, trying different amps through the speakers of the other amps, and he said the best sounding speaker cab had 4 10" speakers, non of which were the same. I think he said there was an old Jenson, a JBL D110, a Rolla, and a Radio Shack branded speaker.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron