| Visit Our Catalog at SteelGuitarShopper.com |

Post new topic Single Neck NO Pad
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Single Neck NO Pad
David Fields

 

From:
South Carolina, USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 7:08 am    
Reply with quote

I am still merely a beginner, and I only have a single neck, but those double necks with a pad or the C6th neck look huge!
From what I hear Lloyd Green kind of brought about the single neck on a double frame with pad.
I just know from what I have (single neck no pad) that a lot of the places that I have played in the past few years would not have the room for such.
I think some might even call them dives?
The stage is an afterthought, and you just could not fit a double in there.
Maybe I am getting in trouble here, but isn't the pad a bit of a crutch?

Dave
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Darvin Willhoite


From:
Roxton, Tx. USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 7:15 am    
Reply with quote

That's kind of the way I always looked at it too. If I played a single neck, I would want a single neck body, why carry around that extra weight. If I need something to lean on between songs, I can lean on the strings, like I do on the D-10.

But everyone has their own opinion, that's why there's Fords and Chevys.
_________________
Darvin Willhoite
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Mudgett


From:
Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 8:41 am    
Reply with quote

To each his own. But there is also the issue of the depth of the body and how one's legs fit under the guitar ergonomically. I have trouble with a narrow single body, because I'm tall and my legs are very long. I can handle a 1-1/2 wide universal or a double wide - but really, honestly - a double-wide usually fits me better. For me, it's a tradeoff between weight and comfort. Suffice to say, the guitar that I schlep around most is a single-wide universal.

I have heard some players - including some very knowledgable ones whose opinions I respect - argue that there is a difference in tonality and sustain. I haven't studied this carefully myself, so I don't have an opinion.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob Carlucci

 

From:
Candor, New York, USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 9:19 am    
Reply with quote

I have played a single frame S 10 since day one... I have had a few D 10's and SD 10's, but I always dump them in favor of a single frame.. I detect no differences in tone or sustain... If its there, its just about imperceptable.

Unlike our taller friend Dave, I like a smaller and lower body, but thats mostly personal taste. Some guys like a bunch of room, but even though I am decent size [210 lb 6 ft] I prefer a more "snug" fit when playing .. I really dislike a large double body steel... bob
View user's profile Send private message
Ben Jones


From:
Seattle, Washington, USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 9:36 am    
Reply with quote

I play an SD10 with a pad because thats the best used guitar I could find/afford. I DO like the knee levers being in a better position for me on the SD10...but I DONT like the added weight. The pads comfy tho..and it makes me feel like I'm sitting at a bar Winking
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jerry Hayes


From:
Virginia Beach, Va.
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 12:09 pm    
Reply with quote

I play a single wide 12 string and have favored that for a long time. I also play guitar at my gigs so I have more room behind my steel for an acoustic or electric guitar without having to slide my packseat back............JH in Va.
_________________
Don't matter who's in Austin (or anywhere else) Ralph Mooney is still the king!!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Doug Beaumier


From:
Northampton, MA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 12:31 pm    
Reply with quote

Unfortunately most of the steel guitar companies no longer make a S-10 without a pad. There is probably more demand for SD-10's nowadays. I guess I'm "old school" because I prefer a single body, no pad.
_________________
My Site / My YouTube Channel
25 Songs C6 Lap Steel / 25 MORE Songs C6 Lap Steel / 16 Songs, C6, A6, B11 / 60 Popular Melodies E9 Pedal Steel
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Calvin Walley


From:
colorado city colorado, USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 5:30 pm    
Reply with quote

after having had 3 S-10s, i have to go along with Ben on this one, i like the placement of the knee levers on my SD-10 much better plus i just like having the pad there
_________________
proud parent of a sailor

Mullen SD-10 /nashville 400
gotta love a Mullen!!!

Guitars that i have owned in order are :
Mullen SD-10,Simmons SD-10,Mullen SD-10,Zum stage one,Carter starter,
Sho-Bud Mavrick
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John Bresler R.I.P.

 

From:
Thornton, Colorado
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 6:12 pm    
Reply with quote

I play a Mullen S-12U which has a half neck with pad on the back side. This adds the depth for knee and pedal placement plus the pad helps greatly for wrist comfort. Not sure if this model is still available.

I've been playing this for about 7 years.

Cool
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Al Marcus


From:
Cedar Springs,MI USA (deceased)
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 7:09 pm    
Reply with quote

Doug-It seems that you and I think a lot alike...al.:::
_________________
Michigan (MSGC)Christmas Dinner and Jam on my 80th Birthday.

My Email.. almarcus@cmedic.net
My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
David Fields

 

From:
South Carolina, USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 8:33 pm     Thanks
Reply with quote

Hey Al:
I just went to you website and besides all of the history really enjoyed the bit about the tunings.
Great information.
Great website. You are truly the musician's musician.

Dave
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
George Kimery

 

From:
Limestone, TN, USA
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 9:54 pm     Single neck without a pad
Reply with quote

I started out with a double 10, then a U-12, no pad, now an Ext. E9th on a double body with a pad. I got used to all of them and never considered it an issue. I liked them all, just fine. Having said that, I must say that I do prefer the single neck on a double body with the pad. I like the placement of the knee levers better, the extra weight seems to make it more stable, and I like being able to rest my arms on the pad. But if I changed guitars for any reason, I would take either one. It is just a matter of what you get used to, in my opinion.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Gambrell

 

From:
Over there
Post  Posted 5 Oct 2007 10:33 pm    
Reply with quote

I can barely get my feet on the pedals of an S-10, much less reach the knee levers. Just not enough room.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Al Marcus


From:
Cedar Springs,MI USA (deceased)
Post  Posted 6 Oct 2007 6:51 am    
Reply with quote

Hi David, Thanks for looking at my website and your kind comments. I appreciate it. Just a little bit of my history over these 70 plus years of playing..al.Smile
_________________
Michigan (MSGC)Christmas Dinner and Jam on my 80th Birthday.

My Email.. almarcus@cmedic.net
My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jimmie Brown

 

From:
Fayetteville, NC, USA
Post  Posted 6 Oct 2007 3:49 pm     single neck
Reply with quote

I have had both but i'm just not as comfortable with the single as i am with the SD with the pad.Also i think that the single is not as stable.


Jimmie
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
David Fields

 

From:
South Carolina, USA
Post  Posted 11 Oct 2007 9:06 am     Not as Stable
Reply with quote

Jimmie:
I would definitely think that anything bigger with more area and weight would definitely be more stable....but to me the great thing about a single neck with no pad is that I can't tell any difference in sustain or sound and they are easier to tote around because of weight.

Dave
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tony Glassman


From:
The Great Northwest
Post  Posted 11 Oct 2007 7:30 pm     Re: Not as Stable
Reply with quote

David Fields wrote:
Jimmie:
I would definitely think that anything bigger with more area and weight would definitely be more stable....but to me the great thing about a single neck with no pad is that I can't tell any difference in sustain or sound and they are easier to tote around because of weight.

Dave



Exactly.....the trade off is stability vs. weight.
View user's profile Send private message
Kevin Hatton

 

From:
Buffalo, N.Y.
Post  Posted 11 Oct 2007 7:54 pm    
Reply with quote

More mass, more tone.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
David Fields

 

From:
South Carolina, USA
Post  Posted 12 Oct 2007 4:02 am     No difference
Reply with quote

Kevin:
More mass more tone would be the logical answer.
I know for sure that I have a good ear for music and that is what it comes down to for me.

I just can't tell the difference.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J Fletcher

 

From:
London,Ont,Canada
Post  Posted 12 Oct 2007 5:10 am    
Reply with quote

What would "more tone" be? More fundamental and fewer harmonics? More of everything? I have two push pulls, an SD10 and an S10, and prefer the sound of the S10. It's livelier, and sounds pretty big. And a lot easier to carry and load in and out of my car's trunk...Jerry
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Al Marcus


From:
Cedar Springs,MI USA (deceased)
Post  Posted 12 Oct 2007 9:04 am    
Reply with quote

I believe that if one of our top stars would play a song on a SD 10 then play the same song on a S10, his tone would be the same, we probably wouldn't notice any difference.....al.SmileSmile
_________________
Michigan (MSGC)Christmas Dinner and Jam on my 80th Birthday.

My Email.. almarcus@cmedic.net
My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jay Jessup


From:
Charlottesville, VA, USA
Post  Posted 12 Oct 2007 9:31 am    
Reply with quote

Kevin Hatton wrote:
More mass, more tone.

Really? I know in the six string world it used to be thought that more mass=more sustain but these days all guitar manufacturers seem to think lighter=more resonant and therefor better tone but maybe this line of thinking doesn't transfer to the steel??
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kevin Hatton

 

From:
Buffalo, N.Y.
Post  Posted 12 Oct 2007 10:11 am    
Reply with quote

My observation over has been a fuller sound overall with an SD-10.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  
Please review our Forum Rules and Policies
Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction, and steel guitar accessories
www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

The Steel Guitar Forum
148 S. Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Click Here to Send a Donation

Email SteelGuitarForum@gmail.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for Band-in-a-Box
by Jim Baron